Improving Pediatric Procedural Skills for EMS Clinicians: A Longitudinal Simulation-Based Curriculum with Novel, Remote, First-Person-View Video-Based Outcome Measurement.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are expected to provide expert care to all patients, but face obstacles in maintaining skillsets required in the care of critically ill or injured children. The objectives of this study were to describe and assess the effectiveness of a pediatric-focused, simulation-based, procedural training program for EMS clinicians, delivered on-site by a pediatric simulation education team. We also describe a novel, remote, asynchronous performance outcome measurement system using first-person-view video review. METHODS: This was a prospective study of simulation-based training and procedural outcomes. The study population involved EMS clinicians at three fire-based EMS agencies stratified as urban, suburban, and rural sites. The primary outcome was performance of intraosseous catheterization (IO), bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), and supraglottic device placement (SGD), measured across three time points. Secondary outcomes were identification of differences across EMS agencies and participant survey responses. RESULTS: We obtained video data from 122 clinicians, totaling 561 videos, with survey response rates of 89.0-91.3%. Pre-intervention scores were high: least-square means (95% confident-intervals) 9.5 (8.9, 10.2) for IO; 9.6 (9.3, 9.9) for BVM; and 11.6 (10.9, 12.2) for SGD. There was significant improvement post-intervention: 11.5 (10.7, 12.3) for IO; 11.0 (10.7, 11.4) for BVM; and 13.6 (12.8, 14.4) for SGD. Improvement was maintained at follow-up after a median of 9.5 months: 10.5 (9.8, 11.2) for IO; 10.2 (9.9, 10.6) for BVM; and 12.4 (11.7, 13.1) for SGD. There were no statistical differences between sites. Of survey respondents, half had not cared for a critically ill or injured child in at least a year, the vast majority had not had hands-on pediatric training in over 6 months, and the majority felt that training should occur at least every 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our pediatric-focused, simulation-based procedural training program was associated with improvement and maintenance of high-baseline procedural performance for EMS clinicians over the study period. Findings were consistent across sites. Remote assessment was feasible. Participant surveys emphasized a desire for more pediatric-focused training and highlighted the low frequency of clinical exposure to procedures potentially needed in the care of critically ill or injured pediatric patients.

Making a move: Using simulation to identify latent safety threats before the care of injured patients in a new physical space.

BACKGROUND: In today's rapidly changing health care environment, hospitals are expanding into newly built spaces. Preserving patient safety by identifying latent safety threats (LSTs) in advance of opening a new physical space is key to continued excellent care. At our level 1 pediatric trauma center, the hospital undertook a 5-year project to build a critical care tower, including a new emergency department with five trauma bays. To allow for identification and mitigation of LSTs before opening, we performed simulation-based clinical systems testing. METHODS: Eight simulation scenarios were developed, based on actual patient presentations, incorporating a variety of injury patterns. Scenarios included workflow and movement from the helipad and squad entrance as well as to radiology, the operating room, and the pediatric intensive care unit. A multiple resuscitation scenario was also designed to test the use of all five bays simultaneously. Multidisciplinary high-fidelity simulations were conducted in the new tower. Key trauma and emergency department stakeholders facilitated all sessions, using a structured framework for systems integration debriefing framework and failure mode and effect analysis to identify and prioritize LSTs, respectively. RESULTS: Eight sessions were conducted for 2 months. A total of 201 staff participated, including trauma surgeons, respiratory therapists, nurses, emergency physicians, x-ray technicians, pharmacists, emergency medical services, and operating room staff. In total, 118 LSTs (average of 14.8/session) were identified. Latent safety threats were categorized. An action plan for mitigation was developed after applying failure mode and effects analysis prioritization scores (based on severity, probability, and ease of detection). CONCLUSION: Systems-focused trauma simulations identified a large number of LSTs before the opening of a new critical care building. Identification of LSTs is feasible and facilitates mitigation before actual patient care begins, improving patient safety. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.