Perceived performance of activities of daily living by stroke patients: key in decision to call EMS and outcomes.

Background: Until recently, public education campaigns aimed at improving help-seeking behavior by acute stroke patients have achieved only limited or even no effects. Better understanding of psychological factors determining help-seeking behavior may be relevant in the design of more effective future campaigns. Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, we interviewed 669 acute stroke patients within 72 h after hospital admission. The primary endpoint was the effect of psychological factors on the decision to call emergency medical services (EMS). Secondary endpoints were the effects of such factors on treatment rates and clinical improvement (difference between modified Rankin scale (MRS) scores at admission and at discharge). Results: Only 48.7% of the study population called the EMS. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses revealed that perception of unimpaired performance of activities of daily living (ADL) was the only psychological factor that predicted EMS use and outcomes. Thus, patients who perceived only minor impairment in performing ADL were less likely to use EMS (odds ratio, 0.54 [95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.76]; p = 0.001), had lower treatment rates, and had less improvement in MRS scores (b = 0.40, p = 0.004). Additional serial mediation analyses involving ischemic stroke patients showed that perception of low impairment in ADL decreased the likelihood of EMS notification, thereby increasing prehospital delays, leading to reduced thrombolysis rates and, finally, to reduced clinical improvement. Conclusion: Perception of unimpaired performance of ADL is a crucial barrier to appropriate help-seeking behavior after acute stroke, leading to undertreatment and less improvement in clinical symptoms. Thus, beyond improving the public's knowledge of stroke symptoms, future public education campaigns should focus on the need for calling the EMS in case of stroke symptoms even if daily activities do not seem to be severely impaired.

Prehospital stroke management and mobile stroke units.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Delayed presentation at the hospital contributes to poorer patient outcomes and undertreatment of acute stroke patients. This review will discuss recent developments in prehospital stroke management and mobile stroke units aimed to improve timely access to treatment within the past 2 years and will point towards future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent progress in research into prehospital stroke management and mobile stroke units ranges from interventions aimed at improving patients' help-seeking behaviour, to the education of emergency medical services team members, to the use of innovative referral methods, such as diagnostic scales, and finally to evidence of improved outcomes by the use of mobile stroke units. SUMMARY: Understanding is increasing about the need for optimizing stroke management over the entire stroke rescue chain with the goal of improving access to highly effective time-sensitive treatment. In the future, we can expect that novel digital technologies and artificial intelligence will become relevant in effective interaction between prehospital and in-hospital stroke-treating teams, with beneficial effects on patients' outcomes.

Premorbid frailty predicts short- and long-term outcomes of reperfusion treatment in acute stroke.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is the most important short- and long-term predictor of disability in the elderly and, thus, might influence the clinical outcome of acute treatment of stroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether frailty predicts short- and long-term all-cause mortality and neurological recovery in elderly patients who underwent reperfusion acute treatment of stroke. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients older than 65 years who underwent reperfusion treatment in a single stroke unit from 2015 to 2016. Predictors of stroke outcomes were assessed including demographics, baseline NIHSS, time to needle, treatment and medical complications. Premorbid frailty was assessed with a comprehensive geriatric assessment including functional, nutritional, cognitive, social and comorbidities status. At three and twelve months, all-cause death and clinical recovery (using modified Rankin scale, mRS) were evaluated. RESULTS: One-hundred and two patients who underwent acute reperfusion treatment for stroke entered the study (mean age 77.5, 65-94 years). Frailty was diagnosed in 32 out of 102 patients and associated with older age (p = 0.001) but no differences in baseline NIHSS score, vascular risk profile or treatment management strategy. Frailty status was associated with worse improvement at 24 h and higher in-hospital mortality. At follow-up, frail patients showed poorer survival at 3 (25% vs 3%, p = 0.008) and 12 (38% vs 7%, p = 0.001) months. Frailty was the best predictor of neurological recovery at one year follow-up (mRS 3.2 ± 1.9 vs 1.9 ± 1.9). DISCUSSION: Frailty is an important predictor of efficacy of acute treatment of stroke beyond classical predictors of stroke outcomes. Larger longitudinal studies are, thus, warranted to evaluate the risk-benefit of reperfusion treatment in the growing elderly frail population.

Case report: cerebral sinus vein thrombosis in two patients with AstraZeneca SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased rate of thromboembolic events and mortality. Different vaccines are globally used to limit the pandemic. In this report, we present the case of two young female patients with newly diagnosed cerebral sinus vein thrombosis occurring after injection of the vector-based ChAdOx1 vaccine. Both patients presented with unusual headache only. The two of them used an estrogen-containing contraception, had had a history of deep venous thrombosis, and both had MTHFR mutations. Both patients developed SARS-CoV-2 specific humoral and cellular immunity including both CD4 and CD8 T cells. This rare, but serious complication needs to be considered after vaccination of young females, even if there is no evidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Effects of state-wide implementation of the Los Angeles Motor Scale for triage of stroke patients in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: The prehospital identification of stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO), that should be immediately transported to a thrombectomy capable centre is an unsolved problem. Our aim was to determine whether implementation of a state-wide standard operating procedure (SOP) using the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) is feasible and enables correct triage of stroke patients to hospitals offering (comprehensive stroke centres, CSCs) or not offering (primary stroke centres, PSCs) thrombectomy. METHODS: Prospective study involving all patients with suspected acute stroke treated in a 4-month period in a state-wide network of all stroke-treating hospitals (eight PSCs and two CSCs). Primary endpoint was accuracy of the triage SOP in correctly transferring patients to CSCs or PSCs. Additional endpoints included the number of secondary transfers, the accuracy of the LAMS for detection of LVO, apart from stroke management metrics. RESULTS: In 1123 patients, use of a triage SOP based on the LAMS allowed triage decisions according to LVO status with a sensitivity of 69.2% (95% confidence interval (95%-CI): 59.0-79.5%) and a specificity of 84.9% (95%-CI: 82.6-87.3%). This was more favourable than the conventional approach of transferring every patient to the nearest stroke-treating hospital, as determined by geocoding for each patient (sensitivity, 17.9% (95%-CI: 9.4-26.5%); specificity, 100% (95%-CI: 100-100%)). Secondary transfers were required for 14 of the 78 (17.9%) LVO patients. Regarding the score itself, LAMS detected LVO with a sensitivity of 67.5% (95%-CI: 57.1-78.0%) and a specificity of 83.5% (95%-CI: 81.0-86.0%). CONCLUSIONS: State-wide implementation of a triage SOP requesting use of the LAMS tool is feasible and improves triage decision-making in acute stroke regarding the most appropriate target hospital.

Impact of mobile stroke units.

Since its first introduction in clinical practice in 2008, the concept of mobile stroke unit enabling prehospital stroke treatment has rapidly expanded worldwide. This review summarises current knowledge in this young field of stroke research, discussing topics such as benefits in reduction of delay before treatment, vascular imaging-based triage of patients with large-vessel occlusion in the field, differential blood pressure management or prehospital antagonisation of anticoagulants. However, before mobile stroke units can become routine, several questions remain to be answered. Current research, therefore, focuses on safety, long-term medical benefit, best setting and cost-efficiency as crucial determinants for the sustainability of this novel strategy of acute stroke management.

Mobile Stroke Unit in the UK Healthcare System: Avoidance of Unnecessary Accident and Emergency Admissions.

BACKGROUND: Acute stroke patients are usually transported to the nearest hospital regardless of their required level of care. This can lead to increased pressure on emergency departments and treatment delay. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore the benefit of a mobile stroke unit (MSU) in the UK National Health Service (NHS) for reduction of hospital admissions. METHODS: Prospective cohort audit observation with dispatch of the MSU in the East of England Ambulance Service area in Southend-on-Sea was conducted. Emergency patients categorized as code stroke and headache were included from June 5, 2018, to December 18, 2018. Rate of avoided admission to the accident and emergency (A&E) department, rate of admission directly to target ward, and stroke management metrics were assessed. RESULTS: In 116 MSU-treated patients, the following diagnoses were made: acute stroke, n = 33 (28.4%); transient ischaemic attacks, n = 13 (11.2%); stroke mimics, n = 32 (27.6%); and other conditions, n = 38 (32.8%). Pre-hospital thrombolysis was administered to 8 of 28 (28.6%) ischaemic stroke patients. Pre-hospital diagnosis avoided hospital admission for 29 (25.0%) patients. As hospital treatment was indicated, 35 (30.2%) patients were directly triaged to the stroke unit, 1 patient (0.9%) even directly to the catheter laboratory. Thus, only 50 (43.1%) patients required transfer to the A&E department. Moreover, the MSU enabled thrombolysis with a median dispatch-to-needle time of 42 min (interquartile range, 40-60). CONCLUSION: This first deployment of an MSU in the UK NHS demonstrated improved triage decision-making for or against hospital admission and admission to the appropriate target ward, thereby reducing pressure on strained A&E departments.

Prehospital stroke management in the thrombectomy era.

Acute stroke management has been revolutionised by evidence of the effectiveness of thrombectomy. Because time is brain in stroke care, the speed with which a patient with large vessel occlusion is transferred to a thrombectomy-capable centre determines outcome. Therefore, each link in the stroke rescue chain, starting with symptom onset and ending with recanalisation, should be streamlined. However, in contrast to inhospital delays, prehospital delays are unchanged despite substantial efforts in quality improvement. Furthermore, thrombectomy is offered by only a few, usually distant, specialised centres and not by the many other, usually nearer, hospitals. To take maximum advantage of the first so-called golden hours after stroke, and because of the difficulty of on-scene triage decision making with respect to the target hospital offering the required level of care, the focus of stroke research has shifted to the prehospital setting. Current research focuses on the effects of public education, implementation of protocols for emergency medical services for streamlining clinical investigations and accurate triage, use of preclinical scales for stroke recognition, and deployment of novel technical solutions such as smartphone applications, telemedicine, and mobile stroke units.