Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing total pharyngolaryngectomy and quality of life: a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Providing cancer patients with adequate information is essential to their confidence and satisfaction regarding medical care. The aims of this study were to evaluate the information given to patients undergoing total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) as well as the evolution and predictors of patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric study on patients undergoing TPL for a locally advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer. All patients completed the EORTC QLQ-INFO25, QLQ-C30, and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires, before and after surgery. RESULTS: This study enrolled 46 patients. Between the pre- and post-therapeutic periods, we observed no significant changes in the global QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 scores. However, we found a significant deterioration in 4 QLQ-INFO25 scales/items and in social functioning, as well as an increase of sense, speech, and social contact problems. N-stage and professional activity were significant predictors of preoperative QLQ-INFO25 scores. Younger age was significantly associated with financial difficulties, whereas professional activity and lower education level were significant predictors of xerostomia and swallowing problems, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing TPL, we observed significant changes in QLQ-INFO25 scores between the pre- and post-treatment periods and, particularly, a deterioration of patient satisfaction with the information received. Several clinical factors were identified as significant predictors of QLQ-INFO25 and QoL scores.

Evolution and predictive factors of quality of life in patients undergoing oncologic surgery for head and neck cancer: A prospective multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess the evolution of quality of life (QoL) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing oncologic surgery and to determine the predictive factors of post-therapeutic QoL. METHODS: All HNSCC patients who underwent primary surgery, between 2012 and 2014, were enrolled in this prospective multicentric study. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires before surgery and at 6 months after treatment. Predictive factors of post-therapeutic QoL scores were determined. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included in this study. There was no significant deterioration of global QoL and no significant increase in general symptoms between the pre- and post-therapeutic periods, but a significant deterioration in role and social functioning, and an increase of most head and neck symptoms. Tumor stage, tumor site and treatment modalities (type of surgery, adjuvant therapy) were the main predictors of QoL scores. We found a negative correlation between satisfaction with the information received and global QoL score or several functioning scales. CONCLUSION: HNSCC surgical treatment affects patients QoL mainly by increasing head and neck symptoms, which results in social and role functioning deterioration. These results are of great interest to improve multidisciplinary care of HNSCC patients.

Evaluation of the information given to patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery using the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 questionnaire: A prospective multicentric study.

AIM: Providing head and neck cancer patients with adequate information is essential to their confidence and satisfaction regarding medical care. The aims of this study were to evaluate patient perceptions of the information received, the predictive factors of such perceptions and their potential correlation with patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentric study using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires before and after surgery. RESULTS: This study enrolled 200 patients, 149 men and 51 women, mean age 63.5 ± 10.3 years. Before and after treatment, global QLQ-INFO25 scores were 39.3 and 42.5, respectively, whereas satisfaction with the information received scores were 69.9 and 58.1, respectively. Regarding EORTC QLQ-INFO25 scores, between the pre- and post-treatment periods, we observed a significant increase in three scales/items (information about other services, information about different places of care and information about things you can do to help yourself) and a significant decrease in two scales/items (satisfaction with the information received and overall the information has been helpful). Before and after treatment, global QoL scores were 62.7 and 61.0, respectively. Overall, we found low correlations between QLQ-INFO25 and QLQ-C30 scores. Patient age and education level, centre of care, tumour site and treatment characteristics had a significant impact on QLQ-INFO25 scores. CONCLUSION: Perceived information was satisfactory in the perioperative period for head and neck cancer patients. Several demographic and clinical factors were identified as significant predictors of QLQ-INFO25 scores.