The cost of ischaemic stroke in Croatia.

Objective: The aim of this analysis was to estimate 1 year and long-term cost and quality of life of ischaemic stroke patients in Croatia. In addition, we aimed to identify and estimate key categories of costs and outcomes driving the burden of stroke in Croatian healthcare system. Methods: Data were derived from analysis of the RES-Q Registry for Croatia in 2018 and supplemented with clinical expert opinion and relevant medical, clinical and economic literature to estimate the course of the disease and treatment patterns in Croatian healthcare system. The health economic model was comprised of a one-year discrete event simulation (DES) mapping real life patient experience and a 10-year Markov model built on existing literature. Cost and health resources use were obtained using Croatian tariffs. Health utilities were mapped to EQ5D from the Barthel Index utilising previously published studies. Results: The key aspects determining costs and quality of life were rehabilitation, discharge to residential care (currently 13% of patients in Croatia) and recurrent stroke. Total 1 year cost per patient was 18,221 EUR having 0.372 QALYs. Conclusion: Direct costing structure of ischaemic stroke in Croatia is above the value of upper-middle income countries. Our study showed that post stroke rehabilitation seems to be a strong modifier of future post-stroke costs and further research into various models of post-stroke care and rehabilitation could be the answer into more successful rehabilitation that could increase QALY and reduce the economic burden of stroke. Further investment in rehabilitation research and provision might bring promising opportunities to improve long term patient outcomes.

Stroke Scales as Assessment Tools in Emergency Settings: A Narrative Review.

In the last 20 years, substantial improvements have been made in stroke recanalization treatment. Good outcomes after modern reperfusion treatment require the rapid and accurate identification of stroke patients. Several stroke rating scales are available or have been proposed for the early recognition of stroke and the evaluation of stroke severity and outcome. This review aims to provide an overview of commonly used stroke scales in emergency and clinical settings. The most commonly used scale in a prehospital setting for stroke recognition is the Face, Arms, Speech, Time (FAST) test. Among many prehospital stroke scales, the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen has the highest sensitivity and specificity for confirming stroke diagnosis. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is the most recommended tool for the evaluation of stroke patients in hospital settings and research, and it has two variants: the shortened NIHSS for Emergency Medical Service and the modified NIHSS. The evaluation of comatose patients usually involves assessment with the Glasgow Coma Scale, which is very useful in patients with hemorrhagic stroke or traumatic brain injury. In patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, the outcome is usually accessed with the Hunt and Hess scale. A commonly used tool for stroke outcome evaluation in clinical/hospital settings and research is the modified Rankin scale. The tools for disability evaluation are the Barthel Index and Functional Independence Measure.