Real-world impact of continuous positive airway pressure on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea in a national registry.

OBJECTIVE: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) persists in some patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) despite continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment. This study characterized response to CPAP and factors associated with residual EDS. METHODS: Danish National Patient Registry data were analyzed. Patients with OSA diagnosis (1994-2016), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores and apnea-hypopnea index recorded before beginning CPAP (baseline) and after 1-13 months of CPAP use, and CPAP adherence were included. Odds ratios (OR) for residual EDS after CPAP treatment were estimated using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 1174 patients (mean age, 57 years; 75.5% male), 41.1% had baseline EDS (mild, 13.2%; moderate, 14.0%; severe, 13.9%); 58.9% did not. After CPAP treatment, follow-up mean ESS scores were normal (≤10) for all baseline EDS subgroups; however, 15.6% (n = 183) of patients had residual EDS (mild, 6.7%; moderate, 5.5%; severe, 3.4%). Odds of residual EDS were higher for patients with mild (OR, 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2-8.6), moderate (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.7-7.4), and severe (OR, 13.0; 95% CI, 8.0-21.2) EDS at baseline compared with those with normal daytime sleepiness at baseline. Patients adherent with CPAP use were 38.2% less likely to have residual EDS compared with nonadherent patients (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: EDS was common in this cohort of Danish patients with OSA. Baseline EDS severity predicted higher odds of residual EDS. After CPAP treatment, adherence was associated with reduced odds of residual EDS, but EDS persisted in a subgroup of patients.

Examining the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness on utility scores in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and/or narcolepsy in five European countries.

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a cardinal symptom of narcolepsy and affects many patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). EDS is associated with reduced quality of life, increased accident risk, and poor workplace performance. Given the impact of EDS, the ability to predict health-related utility from sleepiness is valuable for examining the cost effectiveness of novel treatments. The aim of this study was to examine the association between EDS and EQ-5D in patients with OSA and/or narcolepsy by modelling EQ-5D utility scores from Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Europe 2016/2017 National Health and Wellness Survey, an online, general population survey, designed to represent the age and gender composition of each country's adult population. Analyses included 2,348 patients self-reporting symptomatic and diagnosed OSA (n = 2,277), narcolepsy (n = 48), or both (n = 23). Multivariable models were used to examine ESS as a predictor of EQ-5D utility while adjusting for covariates of interest. Results were validated following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidelines for predictive modelling. RESULTS: Utility decreased as EDS severity increased (no EDS: 0.711 ± 0.251, mild: 0.685 ± 0.261, moderate: 0.643 ± 0.268, severe: 0.559 ± 0.323). Whereas participants with only OSA or only narcolepsy did not differ in utility, those with both conditions had lower scores (0.685 ± 0.266 and 0.627 ± 0.325 vs. 0.439 ± 0.340, respectively). Piecewise linear regression identified a single breakpoint at ESS score of 11.29. In the final model, for each point increase in ESS score, the corresponding decrease in EQ-5D utility was larger among patients with ESS scores ≥ 12 compared to patients with ESS scores ≤ 11 (model slopes: -0.0131 vs. -0.0026, respectively). Findings from the validation sample confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the impact of sleepiness on quality of life (QoL) and its negative impact irrespective of sleep condition (OSA or narcolepsy). The breakpoint identified is relatively consistent with the established ESS cutoff score ≥ 11, which demarcates pathological sleepiness. Furthermore, as EDS severity worsens (increases) on the ESS, the impact on QoL is greater.

Exploring the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnea on patient and partner quality of life: a time trade-off utility study in the UK general public.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) on patient and patient's partner health-related quality of life in the form of utility values typically used in health economic evaluations. METHODS: A time trade-off study was conducted in a UK general population sample (representing a societal perspective) to elicit utility values, measured on a 0 to 1 scale, for health states with varying obstructive sleep apnea-associated EDS severity. In a time trade-off study, health states are described, and participants "trade off" time in a specific higher severity state for a shorter amount of time in full health. RESULTS: Overall, the sample consisted of 104 participants, who were interviewed and took part in the time trade-off exercise to elicit utility values for patient and partner residual EDS health states. The average utility score declined with increasing obstructive sleep apnea-associated EDS severity for both patient (no EDS, 0.926; mild EDS, 0.794; moderate EDS, 0.614; severe EDS, 0.546) and partner (no EDS, 0.955; mild EDS, 0.882; moderate EDS, 0.751; severe EDS, 0.670) health states. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the high impact that EDS in obstructive sleep apnea is estimated to have on patient and partner health-related quality of life. CITATION: Tolley K, Noble-Longster J, Mettam S, et al. Exploring the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness caused by obstructive sleep apnea on patient and partner quality of life: a time trade-off utility study in the UK general public. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2237-2246.

Socioeconomic and humanistic burden of illness of excessive daytime sleepiness severity associated with obstructive sleep apnoea in the European Union 5.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Evaluate the impact of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) severity on burden of illness among adults with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) in European Union 5 (EU5) countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom). PATIENTS/METHODS: This retrospective observational study used data from the 2017 EU5 National Health and Wellness Survey, a self-administered, internet-based, non-screening survey. Respondents who self-reported both having experienced OSA in the last 12 months and having had their OSA diagnosed by a physician were considered to have OSA. Respondents completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and were consequently categorised into 4 groups: OSA-with-EDS (ESS >10) subdivided by EDS severity (mild [ESS = 11-12], moderate [ESS = 13-15], severe [ESS = 16-24]), and OSA-without-EDS (ESS ≤10). Bivariate and multivariable analyses examined group differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment, and health care utilisation. RESULTS: The analysis included 2008 respondents with OSA: n = 661 (32.9%) with EDS (29.5% mild, 34.5% moderate, 36.0% severe) and n = 1347 without EDS. Compared with the OSA-without-EDS group, the OSA-with-EDS subgroups generally had higher rates of obesity, depression, and other reported comorbidities. Greater severity of EDS was associated with worse self-reported HRQoL (all domains, P < 0.001) and work productivity and activity impairment (absenteeism, P = 0.031; presenteeism, overall work impairment, and non-work activity impairment, P < 0.001), as well as increased numbers of health care provider visits (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with OSA but without EDS, those with EDS had substantially higher socioeconomic and humanistic burden of disease, which was more profound among those reporting greater EDS.