Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
2.
JMIR Med Educ ; 6(2): e18340, 2020 Jul 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32628114

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical students are turning to new and expanding web-based resources for learning during their psychiatry clerkships; however, there have not been concomitant efforts by educators to utilize web-based tools to promote innovative teaching. OBJECTIVE: Utilizing a free learning platform (Psy-Q) created by our team, we sought to explore how digital technology may engage medical student learners, promote colearning between educators and medical students, and support sustainability of web-based platforms through crowdsourcing. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, seven medical schools offered access to the platform during medical students' psychiatry clerkships. Use of the web-based platform was voluntary and not monitored or related to clerkship evaluation. Medical students completed a paper and pencil assessment of the platform at the end of their clerkship. Anonymous and aggregated website use data were gathered in accordance with institutional review board approval. RESULTS: A total of 203 medical students across seven distinct psychiatry clerkships completed the survey. Of these students, 123 (60.6%) reported using the platform and reported accessing a mean of 45 questions. The most common device used to access the platform was a laptop and the second most common was a smartphone. The most common location to access the platform was home and the second most common was the hospital. Although few students contributed new questions, website utilization data suggested that all rated the quality and difficulty of the questions. Higher quality questions were medical students' main suggestion for further improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the feasibility and potential of educator- and learner-created web-based platforms to augment psychiatry education and develop relevant accessible resources in the digital sphere. Future work should focus on measuring objective educational outcomes of question taking and writing, as well as optimizing technology and exploring sustainable trainee-faculty partnership models for the creation and curation of content.

3.
Med Sci Educ ; 30(1): 235-241, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32435524

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of a stress management workshop on medical students' knowledge of stress and potential coping strategies. METHODS: A panel discussion with small group breakouts on stress in clinical medicine, learning challenges, competition with colleagues, handling stressful events, and recognizing burnout symptoms was conducted with medical students entering clerkships. A longitudinal survey design was utilized to measure pre-, post-, and long-term (3-month) changes in knowledge (impact of stress on personal health, learning, and patient care), confidence, perceived skills, and attitude (towards utilizing adaptive coping strategies) among participating students (N = 135). Paired t test and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the differences between survey responses on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Survey response rates were pre-90.4%, post-77%, and long-term post-71.1%. Compared to pre-workshop, students reported significant improvement in all four domains immediately post-workshop: knowledge (4.4 vs. 4.7, p < 0.05), confidence (3.6 vs. 3.9, p < 0.05), perceived skills (3.3 vs. 3.7, p < 0.05), and attitude (2.6 vs. 2.8, p < 0.05). Compared to immediate post-workshop, students' scores slightly decreased at 3 months but were overall significantly higher than the pre-workshop scores. CONCLUSIONS: A stress management workshop can improve medical students' knowledge of the impact of stress as well as the use of adaptive stress coping strategies.

4.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(8): 1601-1605, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143985

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to identify predictors associated with preferences for patient-centered care among cancer survivors and the association between cancer health literacy and patient-centered care preferences. METHODS: Cross sectional analyses of N = 345 adult cancer survivors (5 years post cancer diagnosis) attending follow-ups at University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia. Face-to face-interviews were conducted using the 30-item Cancer Health Literacy Test and the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale to determine preference for patient-centered care. RESULTS: Cancer survivors' preference for patient-centered care was associated with a higher cancer health literacy score, higher educational level, being employed, breast cancer diagnosis, and not desiring psychological support [F (14, 327) = 11.25, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.325]. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study provide insights into preferences for patient-centered care among cancer survivors during receipt of follow-up care, which remains an understudied phase of cancer care delivery. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts are needed to ensure different preferences for care are taken into account particularly in the setting of variable cancer health literacy.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Alfabetización en Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Malasia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Distrés Psicológico , Apoyo Social , Adulto Joven
5.
J Clin Oncol ; 36(19): 1957-1962, 2018 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29746226

RESUMEN

Background Although almost every state medical marijuana (MM) law identifies cancer as a qualifying condition, little research supports MM's use in oncology. We hypothesized that the discrepancy between these laws and the scientific evidence base poses clinical challenges for oncologists. Oncologists' beliefs, knowledge, and practices regarding MM were examined in this study. Methods In November 2016, we mailed a survey on MM to a nationally-representative, random sample of 400 medical oncologists. Main outcome measures included whether oncologists reported discussing MM with patients, recommended MM clinically in the past year, or felt sufficiently informed to make such recommendations. The survey also queried oncologists' views on MM's comparative effectiveness for several conditions (including its use as an adjunct to standard pain management strategies) and its risks compared with prescription opioids. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using standard statistical techniques. Results The overall response rate was 63%. Whereas only 30% of oncologists felt sufficiently informed to make recommendations regarding MM, 80% conducted discussions about MM with patients, and 46% recommended MM clinically. Sixty-seven percent viewed it as a helpful adjunct to standard pain management strategies, and 65% thought MM is equally or more effective than standard treatments for anorexia and cachexia. Conclusion Our findings identify a concerning discrepancy between oncologists' self-reported knowledge base and their beliefs and practices regarding MM. Although 70% of oncologists do not feel equipped to make clinical recommendations regarding MM, the vast majority conduct discussions with patients about MM and nearly one-half do, in fact, recommend it clinically. A majority believes MM is useful for certain indications. These findings are clinically important and suggest critical gaps in research, medical education, and policy regarding MM.


Asunto(s)
Cultura , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Marihuana Medicinal/administración & dosificación , Oncólogos/psicología , Oncólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Marihuana Medicinal/efectos adversos , Oncología Médica/métodos , Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
Psychosomatics ; 59(1): 75-80, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28987290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry clerkship rotations may improve medical students' understanding of psychiatric principles relevant to the settings in which they will ultimately practice. This study aimed to characterize students' experiences on C-L rotations. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey study, sponsored by the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Subcommittee on Medical Student Education, was conducted at 5 US medical schools between 2012 and 2016. After the C-L rotation, students completed a voluntary 17-item survey. RESULTS: A total of 235 surveys were collected (mean response rate = 92%). The most frequently endorsed benefit of C-L was learning to manage psychiatric disorders in the context of medical illness (89%). The most frequently endorsed drawback was inconsistent/excessively variable workload (40%). Overall, 82% of respondents recommended C-L to other students; 80% reported that the ideal clerkship would include exposure to both C-L and inpatient psychiatry. Overall, 38% reported that their C-L experience increased their interest in psychiatry as a career. Effect of C-L on interest in psychiatry did not differ by study site, age, sex, clerkship length, or time spent on C-L. Respondents who noted more positive role-modeling on C-L compared to other clerkship rotations were more likely to report increased interest in a psychiatry career (odds ratio = 2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Most medical students perceive C-L rotations favorably. Positive role modeling may increase their consideration of psychiatry specialization. The findings that C-L rotation length did not correlate with attitudes and that most students preferred exposure to both inpatient and C-L psychiatry suggest that C-L exposure can beneficially be integrated into core clerkships containing other elements.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Psiquiatría/educación , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Cancer ; 124(2): 406-416, 2018 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29152719

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scant evidence exists on the long-term course of cancer-related post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is among the few studies worldwide, and the first in the South-East Asian region, to prospectively evaluate PTSD in patients with cancer using gold-standard clinical interviews. The objective of the study was to assess the course and predictors of PTSD in adult patients with cancer in a South-East Asian population. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study was conducted in a cohort of 469 consecutively recruited patients (aged ≥18 years) with various cancer types within 1 month of diagnosis at a single oncology referral center. Only patients who had significant psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total cutoff score ≥16) underwent the PTSD module of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (SCID) at at 6-months follow-up. All patients completed the SCID at the 4-year follow-up assessment regardless of their initial Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score. RESULTS: In an analysis combining patients who had both full and subsyndromal PTSD, there was a 21.7% incidence of PTSD at the 6-month follow-up assessment (n = 44 of 203 SCID-interviewed patients), with rates dropping to 6.1% at the 4-year follow-up assessment (n = 15 of 245 SCID-interviewed patients). Patients with breast cancer (compared with those who had other types of cancer) were 3.68 times less likely to develop PTSD at 6-months, but not at 4-years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates of PTSD decreased with time, but one-third of patients (34.1%) who were initially diagnosed had persistent or worsening PTSD 4 years later. There is a need for early identification of this subset of patients who have cancer with PTSD to design risk-targeted interventions. Cancer 2018;124:406-16. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
AMA J Ethics ; 19(5): 467-474, 2017 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553904

RESUMEN

Given the recent studies promoting time-limited manualized therapies in the oncology setting, clinicians may be reluctant to offer traditional psychodynamic therapy to cancer patients. However, there are no studies directly comparing psychodynamic therapy and other therapy modalities in this patient population and no data suggesting harm from psychodynamic approaches. Therefore, it is inappropriate to draw the conclusion that psychodynamic therapy is inferior to manualized therapy from existing evidence. Manualized treatment, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, is generally short term and therefore may reduce the practitioner's own anxiety stemming from exposure to patients facing grave disability and death. However, manualized treatment is not fully effective in specific clinical scenarios. We present a case reflecting these limitations and advocate for a flexible treatment approach incorporating elements of psychodynamic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Psicoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Salud Mental , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Cancer ; 123(14): 2735-2742, 2017 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28267211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with carcinoid tumors frequently could benefit from the pharmacologic treatment of depression and anxiety. However, many prescribers avoid serotonergic medications due to the theoretical risk of exacerbating carcinoid syndrome. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with carcinoid tumors and elevated serotonin levels (as measured by 24-hour urine 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid [5-HIAA]) at Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center who initiated treatment with serotonergic antidepressants after a carcinoid diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Each medication regimen was categorized based on the presence of adverse interactions as defined by clinical worsening of symptoms of carcinoid syndrome in the absence of progressive disease that temporally correlated with a serotonergic medication trial. RESULTS: A total of 73 serotonergic regimens received by 52 patients were included in the primary analysis. Among these medication trials, 8.2% of the regimens (6 regimens) were categorized as being associated with a likely adverse interaction, 61.6% of the regimens (45 regimens) were categorized as having no adverse reaction, 9.6% of the regimens (7 regimens) were categorized as an unlikely adverse reaction, and 20.6% of the regimens (15 regimens) were categorized as unknown. It is interesting to note that none of the 73 trials resulted in a carcinoid crisis requiring emergency care or hospitalization. Only 3 patients discontinued serotonergic medications due to worsening carcinoid syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Serotonergic medications appear to be a safe option for the treatment of depressive and anxiety symptoms in the majority of patients with neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome. In the current study, <10% of patients developed a combination of flushing, diarrhea, and bloating after the initiation of serotonergic medications. Clinicians can begin with low doses, monitor these symptoms, and reduce the dose or discontinue the medication if necessary. Cancer 2017;123:2735-42. © 2017 American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Carcinoide Maligno/metabolismo , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/complicaciones , Tumor Carcinoide/complicaciones , Tumor Carcinoide/metabolismo , Depresión/complicaciones , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/etiología , Femenino , Rubor/inducido químicamente , Rubor/etiología , Humanos , Ácido Hidroxiindolacético/orina , Masculino , Síndrome Carcinoide Maligno/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Menopause ; 23(2): 209-14, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26125538

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to obtain preliminary data on the efficacy of armodafinil for improving menopause-related fatigue and quality of life. METHODS: Women (aged 40-65 y) experiencing menopause-related fatigue received open-label armodafinil therapy (up to 150 mg/d) for 4 weeks. Changes from baseline in Brief Fatigue Inventory score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) physical domain score were examined using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Exploratory analyses examined the effects of armodafinil on hot flashes, overall quality of life, insomnia, depression, anxiety, and perceived cognitive performance. After open-label treatment, participants were randomized to double-blind continuation of armodafinil versus placebo for 2 weeks to examine whether treatment discontinuation would precipitate symptom recurrence. RESULTS: Of 29 eligible participants, 20 women (69.0%) completed the trial. During treatment with armodafinil (mean dose, 120 mg/d), median Brief Fatigue Inventory scores decreased by 57.7% from 5.2 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.6-6.2) to 2.2 (IQR, 1.1-4.4; P = 0.0002), and median MENQOL physical domain scores decreased by 51.3% from 3.9 (IQR, 2.3-4.8) to 1.9 (IQR, 1.3-2.7; P = 0.0001). Median hot flashes for 24 hours decreased by 48.3% from 2.9 (IQR, 1.1-4.6) to 1.5 (IQR, 0.4-2.4; P = 0.0005). Improvements in MENQOL total score (49%; P = 0.0001), cognitive function (59.2%; P = 0.0002), depressive symptoms (64.7%; P = 0.0006), insomnia (72.7%; P = 0.0012), and excessive sleepiness (57.1%; P = 0.0006) were noted. Randomized continuation (n = 10) or discontinuation (n = 10) did not indicate group differences. Armodafinil was well-tolerated; three women (12%) were withdrawn for adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest a therapeutic effect of armodafinil on fatigue affecting quality of life during menopause, and a potential benefit for other menopause-related symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Bencidrilo/administración & dosificación , Fatiga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Menopausia , Promotores de la Vigilia/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modafinilo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Cancer ; 121(22): 3938-47, 2015 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26264701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For many female cancer survivors, the preservation of reproductive potential is central to quality of life (QOL), and concerns regarding infertility may affect treatment decisions. Despite the existence of several consensus guidelines supporting routine fertility preservation consultation, to the authors' knowledge little is known regarding psychological outcomes in female cancer patients who undergo fertility preservation counseling/consultation (FPC), with or without fertility preservation (FP). METHODS: This literature review examined the effect of FPC alone, or with FP, on psychological outcomes including satisfaction, decisional regret, and QOL. PubMed and PsychINFO were systematically searched for English-language publications from the earliest available publication date of each database through March 2015. Among 111 unique articles concerning oncofertility, 13 met inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed articles reporting primary data regarding satisfaction and psychological outcomes among women who underwent FPC alone or with FP. RESULTS: A majority of women receiving FPC reported that the possibility of FP was instrumental to improved coping. Receiving FPC reduced long-term regret and dissatisfaction concerning fertility, and was associated with improved physical QOL and trends toward improved psychological QOL. Women also desired prompt, standardized, and written information addressing perceived unmet needs specific to oncofertility. Offering FPC was perceived as critical regardless of age or parity. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors' knowledge, little research to date has addressed the impact of FPC alone, or with FP, on QOL in women with cancer. Clinicians should recognize the existing evidence base supporting the psychological benefit of prompt FPC. Future research must be conducted to elucidate the long-term psychosocial effects of FP.


Asunto(s)
Consejo , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Neoplasias/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Derivación y Consulta
18.
Cancer ; 121(1): 132-8, 2015 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25208515

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Investigations of long-term cancer survivors (LTCS) indicate that this population is not appreciably different from cancer-naive peers with respect to several neuropsychiatric domains. The current study sought to determine whether differences in psychiatric medication use might help to explain the negative findings. METHODS: In a nationally representative sample, 5692 subjects were queried for cancer history, psychiatric diagnoses, and psychotropic medication use. The LTCS were defined as those individuals who were ≥5 years from diagnosis and whose cancer was in remission or cured. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from multivariable logistic regression models evaluating the relationship between cancer status and use of psychiatric medications. The interaction between case/control status and psychiatric diagnoses was also tested in a logistic regression model to predict psychotropic medication use. RESULTS: A total of 225 participants met the criteria for LTCS and 3953 met the criteria for cancer-naive controls (CNC). The LTCS were no more likely than CNC to carry a psychiatric diagnosis. Despite the LTCS reporting somewhat greater psychotropic medication use compared with the CNC (28.8% vs 22.3%), unadjusted and adjusted differences did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to sample size. The interaction between case/control status and carrying a psychiatric diagnosis was not found to be significantly associated with receiving a psychiatric medication. CONCLUSIONS: LTCS and CNC demonstrated comparable rates of psychiatric prescription medication use. The relationship between taking a psychiatric medication and carrying a psychiatric diagnosis was not found to be significantly different between the case and control groups. These findings contribute to an emerging hypothesis that in general LTCS are not a particularly psychiatrically vulnerable group.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicología , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones
19.
Psychooncology ; 24(9): 1080-7, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25389107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Major depression adversely affects health communication, quality of life, and survival in patients with advanced cancer. Prior research provides limited insight into how patients with advanced cancer differ from the general population in risk for developing a major depressive episode (MDE). This study aims to determine whether advanced cancer poses distinct risks for initial and recurrent MDEs. METHODS: Advanced cancer patients (N = 628) from Coping with Cancer were compared with propensity-weighted general population controls (N = 9282) from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. RESULTS: Patients with advanced cancer were more likely than comparisons to have an initial MDE [OR = 27.3, 95% CI = (14.8-50.4); p < 0.001] but no more likely than comparisons to have a recurrent MDE [OR = 1.5, 95% CI = (0.9-2.6); p = 0.160]. Nearly two thirds (64.4%) of current MDEs in patients were initial onset; the vast majority (91.8%) of current MDEs in comparisons were recurrent. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced cancer increases risk of an initial MDE but appears not to enhance risk of a recurrent MDE. This suggests the importance of screening widely for depression in patients with advanced cancer as opposed to targeting screening to presumably high-risk subgroups of those with psychiatric histories.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias/psicología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...