RESUMEN
Gait disorders are predisposing factors for falls. They are accessible to rehabilitation and can be analyzed using tools that collect spatio-temporal parameters of walking, such as the GAITRite® mat. The objective of this retrospective study was to find differences between the spatio-temporal parameters in patients who had fallen compared to patients who did not fall in a population of older patients hospitalized in acute geriatrics department. Patients over 75 years were included. For each patient, spatio-temporal parameters were collected using the GAITRite® mat. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had a history of fall. The spatio-temporal parameters were compared between the two groups and in relation to the general population. Sixty-seven patients, with an average age of 85.9 ± 6 years, were included. The patients had comorbidities, cognitive impairment and were polymedicated. The mean walking speed was 51.4 cm/s in non-fallers group and 47.3 cm/s in fallers group (p = 0.539), indicating pathological walking in comparison with the general population of the same age (average 100 cm/s). No association was found between the spatio-temporal parameters and fall, probably linked to many confounding factors such as the pathogenicity of walking of our patients and their comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Marcha , Caminata , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Velocidad al CaminarRESUMEN
The objectives of this study were to assess the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD-IgG response over time among older people after COVID-19 infection or vaccination and its comparison with indicative levels of protection. Geriatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 serological test results were included and divided into three groups. A vaccine group (n = 34), a group of natural COVID-19 infection (n = 32), and a group who contracted COVID-19 less than 15 days after the first injection (n = 17). Eighty-three patients were included; the median age with IQR was 87 (81-91) years. In the vaccine group at 1 month since the first vaccination, the median titer of anti-RBD-IgG was 620 (217-1874) BAU/ml with 87% of patients above the theoretical protective threshold of 141 BAU/ml according to Dimeglio et al. (J Infec. 84(2):248-88, [7]). Seven months after the first vaccination, this titer decreased to 30 (19-58) BAU/ml with 9.5% of patients > 141 BAU/ml. In the natural COVID-19 infection group, at 1 month since the date of first symptom onset, the median titer was 798 (325-1320) BAU/ml with 86.7% of patients > 141 BAU/ml and fell to 88 (37-385) with 42.9% of patients > 141 BAU/ml at 2 months. The natural infection group was vaccinated 3 months after the infection. Five months after the vaccination cycle, the median titer was 2048 (471-4386) BAU/ml with 83.3% of patients > 141 BAU/ml. This supports the clinical results describing the decrease in vaccine protection over time and suggests that vaccination after infection can maintain significantly higher antibody titer levels for a prolonged period of time.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunidad Humoral , Inmunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Virosis , Humanos , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroconversión , Hospitales Universitarios , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
COVID-19 is a particularly aggressive disease for the elderly as 86% of deaths related to COVID-19 occur in people over 65 years of age. Despite the urgent need for a preventive treatment, there are currently no serious leads, other than the vaccination. The aim of this retrospective case-control study is to find a pharmacological preventive treatment of COVID-19 in elderly patients. One-hundred-seventy-nine patients had been in contact with other COVID-19 patients at home or in hospital, of whom 89 had tested RT-PCR-positive (COVID-pos) for the virus and 90 had tested RT-PCR-negative (COVID-neg). Treatments within 15 days prior to RT-PCR (including antihypertensive drugs, antipsychotics, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), oral antidiabetics (OADs), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants), comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory values, and clinical outcome were all collected. COVID-pos patients more frequently had a history of diabetes (P = .016) and alcoholism (P = .023), a lower leukocyte count (P = .014) and a higher mortality rate - 29.2% versus 14.4% - (P = .014) when compared to COVID-neg patients. Patients on PPIs were 2.3 times less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.4381, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.2331, 0.8175], P = .0053) to develop COVID-19 infection, compared to those not on PPIs. No other treatment decreased or increased this risk. COVID-pos patients on antipsychotics (P = .0013) and OADs (P = .0153), particularly metformin (P = .0237), were less likely to die. Thus, patients on treatment with PPI were less likely to develop COVID-19 infection, and those on antipsychotics or metformin had a lower risk of mortality. However, prospective studies, including clinical trials, are needed to confirm or not these findings.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Here, we present the case of an 81-year-old male patient, who was hospitalized for a severe form of COVID-19. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed 1 month after symptom onset was normal. Respiratory evolution was favourable, and the patient was discharged at Day 78. At 6 months, despite a good functional recovery, he presented pulmonary sequelae, and the TTE revealed a clear reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mild LV dilatation without cardiac symptoms. The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using Lake Louise Criteria (LLC), T1 and T2 mapping showed focal infero-basal LV wall oedema, elevated T1 and T2 myocardial relaxation times especially in basal inferior and infero-lateral LV walls, and sub-epicardial late gadolinium enhancement in those LV walls. The diagnosis of active myocarditis was raised especially based on TTE abnormalities and CMR LLC, T1 and T2 mapping. Currently, we are not aware of published reports of a 6 month post-COVID-19 active myocarditis.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miocarditis , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medios de Contraste , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gadolinio , Humanos , Masculino , Miocarditis/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular IzquierdaAsunto(s)
Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Falls among older people are a major health issue and the first cause of accidental death after 75 years of age. Post-fall syndrome (PFS) is commonly known and yet poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: Identify risk factors for PFS and do a follow-up 1 year later. METHODS: We included all patients over 70 years of age hospitalized after suffering a fall in a case-control study, and then followed them in a cohort study. PFS was retained in case of functional mobility decline (transferring, walking) occurring following a fall in the absence of an acute neurological, orthopedic or rheumatic pathology directly responsible for the decline. The data initially collected were: clinical (anamnestic, emergency and departmental/ward evolution, medical history, lifestyle, treatments, clinical examination items); and imaging if the patient had been subjected to brain imaging in the last 3 years prior to inclusion. Regarding the follow-up at 1 year, we collected from the general physician the occurrence and the characteristics of new falls, functional mobility assessment, hospitalization and death. RESULTS: Inclusion took place from March 29, 2016 to June 7, 2016 and follow-up until June 30, 2017. We included 70 patients. A total of 29 patients exhibited a PFS (41.4 %). Risk factors for PFS included age, walking disorder prior to the fall, the use of a walking aid prior to the fall, no unaccompanied outdoor walk in the week before the fall, visual impairment making close reading impossible, stiffness in ankle dorsiflexion, grip strength and the fear of falling. Among patients with PFS, 52.9% could still perform a transfer at 1 year and 64.7% could still walk against 80.7% and 85.2%, respectively, for patients without PFS. CONCLUSION: The study showed the existence of body functions/structure impairments and activity limitations prior to the fall among patients exhibiting a PFS. This suggests the existence of a pre-fall syndrome, i.e., a psychomotor disadaptation syndrome existing prior to the fall. Among the 8 risk factors, fear of falling, vision impairment and muscle strength could be targeted for improvement. The diagnosis of PFS could be a marker of loss of functional mobility at 1 year.