RESUMEN
BU is a key compound of conditioning regimens in children undergoing hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Inter-individual differences in BU pharmacokinetics (PKs) might affect BU efficacy and toxicity. As BU is mainly metabolized by glutathione S-transferase (GST), we investigated the relationship between GSTA1, GSTM1 and GSTP1 genotypes with first-dose BU PKs, and the relationship with HSCT outcomes in 69 children receiving myeloablative conditioning regimen. GSTM1 null genotype correlated with higher BU exposure and lower clearance in patients older than 4 years (P ≤ 0.04). In accordance with the suggested functional role, GSTA1*A2 haplotype was associated with lower drug levels and higher drug clearance (P ≤ 0.03). Gene-dosage effect was also observed (P ≤ 0.007). GSTA1 haplotypes were associated with HSCT outcomes. Patients with two copies of haplotype *A2 had better event free survival (P=0.03). In contrast, homozygous individuals for haplotypes *B and *B1 had higher occurrence of veno-occlusive disease (P=0.009). GSTM1 null individuals older than 4 years had more frequently graft versus host disease (P=0.03). In conclusion, we showed that GST gene variants influence BU PK and outcomes of HSCT in children. A model for the dosage adjustment with the inclusion of genetic and non-genetic factors should be evaluated in a future prospective validation cohort.
Asunto(s)
Busulfano , Glutatión Transferasa/genética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Agonistas Mieloablativos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Aloinjertos , Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Busulfano/farmacocinética , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Dosificación de Gen , Glutatión Transferasa/metabolismo , Haplotipos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Agonistas Mieloablativos/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Mieloablativos/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
Some clinical characteristics of cord blood transplantation (CBT) might be explained by specificities in the reconstitution of immune subsets differing by their maturation stage or their implication in GVHD, tolerance or immune responses against tumor or infectious agents. Here, we compare the immune reconstitution of several of these subsets after CBT and BMT. B-cell count recovery was faster after CBT. There was no difference in the recovery of CD4(+) and CD8(+) cell counts. There was no difference either in the frequency of several subsets: CD45RO(+) memory, and CD45RA(+) naïve cells within the CD4(+) T-cell compartment, CD27(+) among B cells, CD56(bright), NKG2A(+), and KIR(+) cells among natural killer (NK) cells, CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells and invariant NKT cells. The proportion of the thymic naïve CD31(+)CD45RA(+)CD4(+) T cells was lower after CBT at 6 months post-transplant, and was still below normal at 1 year in both groups. NK-cell expansion was more sustained after CBT, with fewer double-negative NKG2A(-)KIR(-) hyporesponsive cells and more double-positive NKG2A(+)KIR(+) hyper-responsive NK cells. These results, therefore, indicate that further research to improve CBT outcome should try to improve thymopoieisis and take advantage of the sustained NK-cell reconstitution.