Two-way feedback between chromatin compaction and histone modification state explains S. cerevisiae heterochromatin bistability.

Compact chromatin is closely linked with gene silencing in part by sterically masking access to promoters, inhibiting transcription factor binding and preventing polymerase from efficiently transcribing a gene. Here, we propose a broader view: chromatin compaction can be both a cause and a consequence of the histone modification state, and this tight bidirectional interaction can underpin bistable transcriptional states. To test this theory, we developed a mathematical model for the dynamics of the HMR locus in S. cerevisiae, that incorporates activating histone modifications, silencing proteins and a dynamic, acetylation-dependent, three-dimensional locus size. Chromatin compaction enhances silencer protein binding, which in turn feeds back to remove activating histone modifications, leading to further compaction. The bistable output of the model was in good agreement with prior quantitative data, including switching rates from expressed to silent states, and vice versa, and protein binding levels within the locus. We then tested the model by predicting changes in switching rates as the genetic length of the locus was increased, which were then experimentally verified. This bidirectional feedback between chromatin compaction and the histone modification state may be an important regulatory mechanism at many loci.

Two timescales control the creation of large protein aggregates in cells.

Protein aggregation is of particular interest because of its connection with many diseases and disorders. Many factors can alter the dynamics and result of this process, one of them being the diffusivity of the monomers and aggregates in the system. Here, we study experimentally and theoretically an aggregation process in cells, and we identify two distinct physical timescales that set the number and size of aggregates. The first timescale involves fast aggregation of small clusters freely diffusing in the cytoplasm, whereas in the second one, the aggregates are larger than the pore size of the cytoplasm and thus barely diffuse, and the aggregation process is slowed down. However, the process is not entirely halted, potentially reflecting a myriad of active but random forces that stir the aggregates. Such a slow timescale is essential to account for the experimental results of the aggregation process. These results could also have implications in other processes of spatial organization in cell biology, such as phase-separated droplets.