Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37305790

RESUMEN

Integration of mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) into chronic lung disease management is becoming increasingly popular. MHealth apps may support adoption of self-management behaviors to assist people in symptoms control and quality of life enhancement. However, mHealth apps' designs, features, and content are inconsistently reported, making it difficult to determine which were the effective components. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the characteristics and features of published mHealth apps for chronic lung diseases. A structured search strategy across five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane) was performed. Randomized controlled trials investigating interactive mHealth apps in adults with chronic lung disease were included. Screening and full-text reviews were completed by three reviewers using Research Screener and Covidence. Data extraction followed the mHealth Index and Navigation Database (MIND) Evaluation Framework (https://mindapps.org/), a tool designed to help clinicians determine the best mHealth apps to address patients' needs. Over 90,000 articles were screened, with 16 papers included. Fifteen distinct apps were identified, 8 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (53%) and 7 for asthma (46%) self-management. Different resources informed app design approaches, accompanied with varying qualities and features across studies. Common reported features included symptom tracking, medication reminders, education, and clinical support. There was insufficient information to answer MIND questions regarding security and privacy, and only five apps had additional publications to support their clinical foundation. Current studies reported designs and features of self-management apps differently. These app design variations create challenges in determining their effectiveness and suitability for chronic lung disease self-management. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021260205). Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13721-023-00419-0.

2.
Int J Med Inform ; 162: 104754, 2022 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395474

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Home-based telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation (HTPR) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasingly common partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, optimal HTPR programming has not been described. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the design, delivery, and effects of HTPR for people with COPD. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched to July 2021 for studies on adults with COPD utilizing information or communication technology to monitor or deliver HTPR. A meta-analysis was performed on a subset of randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Of 3124 records retrieved, 38 studies evaluating 1993 individuals with stable COPD (age 54-75 and FEV1 31-92% predicted) were included. Program components included exercise and education (n = 17) or exercise alone (n = 15) with in-clinic baseline assessments commonly conducted (n = 26). Few trials (n = 7) featured synchronous virtual exercise supervision. Aerobic exercise commonly involved walking (n = 14) and cycling (n = 11) and most programs included resistance training (n = 25). Exercise progressions and emergency action plans were inconsistently reported. Meta-analysis demonstrated HTPR was comparable to outpatient PR and had a greater effect than usual care for the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mean difference [95 %CI]: -0.49 [-0.77, -0.22], p < 0.01) and COPD Assessment Test score (-4.90 [-7.13, -2.67], p < 0.01). Neither HTPR nor outpatient PR impacted sedentary time or step count. Only 6% of studies reported race and no studies reported participant ethnicity. CONCLUSION: This review revealed the heterogeneity of HTPR program designs in COPD. HTPR programs had similar effects to outpatient PR programs and greater effects than usual care for people with COPD.

3.
Exp Physiol ; 104(12): 1952-1962, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31603268

RESUMEN

NEW FINDINGS: What is the Central question? Does dopamine, a pulmonary vascular vasodilator, contribute to the regulation of pulmonary diffusing capacity and capillary blood volume responses to exercise and exercise tolerance? What are the main findings and their importance? Dopamine appears not to be important for regulating pulmonary diffusing capacity or pulmonary capillary blood volume during exercise in healthy participants. Dopamine blockade trials demonstrated that endogenous dopamine is important for maintaining exercise tolerance; however, exogenous dopamine does not improve exercise tolerance. ABSTRACT: Pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc ) and diffusing membrane capacity (Dm ) expansion are important contributors to the increased pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCO ) observed during upright exercise. Dopamine is a pulmonary vascular vasodilator, and recent studies suggest that it may play a role in Vc regulation through changes in pulmonary vascular tone. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of exogenous dopamine and dopamine receptor-2 (D2 -receptor) blockade on DLCO , Vc and Dm at baseline and during cycle exercise, as well as time-to-exhaustion at 85% of V̇O2peak . We hypothesized that dopamine would increase DLCO , Vc , Dm and time-to-exhaustion, while D2 -receptor blockade would have the opposite effect. We recruited 14 young, healthy, recreationally active subjects ( V̇O2peak 45.8 ± 6.6 ml kg-1  min-1 ). DLCO , Vc and Dm were determined at baseline and during exercise at 60% and 85% of V̇O2peak under the following randomly assigned and double blinded conditions: (1) intravenous saline and placebo pill, (2) intravenous dopamine (2 µg kg-1  min-1 ) and placebo pill, and (3) intravenous saline and D2 -receptor antagonist (20 mg oral metoclopramide). Exogenous dopamine and dopamine blockade had no effect on DLCO , Vc and Dm responses at baseline or during exercise. Dopamine blockade reduced time-to-exhaustion by 47% (P = 0.04), but intravenous dopamine did not improve time-to-exhaustion. While dopamine modulation did not affect DLCO , Vc or Dm , the reduction in time-to-exhaustion with D2 -receptor blockade suggests that endogenous dopamine is important for exercise tolerance.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Sanguíneo/efectos de los fármacos , Capilares/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de los Receptores de Dopamina D2/administración & dosificación , Dopamina/administración & dosificación , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/efectos de los fármacos , Capacidad de Difusión Pulmonar/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Volumen Sanguíneo/fisiología , Capilares/fisiología , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Metoclopramida/administración & dosificación , Capacidad de Difusión Pulmonar/fisiología , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/efectos de los fármacos , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/fisiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Respir Med ; 145: 57-65, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509717

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous work suggests that mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have greater lung dysfunction than previously appreciated from spirometry alone. There is evidence of pulmonary microvascular dysfunction in mild COPD, which may reduce diffusing capacity (DLCO) and increase ventilatory inefficiency during exercise. The purpose of this study was to determine if DLCO, pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc), and membrane diffusing capacity (Dm) are diminished during exercise in mild COPD, and whether this is related to ventilatory inefficiency and dyspnea. METHODS: Seventeen mild COPD patients (FEV1/FVC: 64 ±â€¯4%, FEV1 = 94 ±â€¯11%pred) and 17 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited. Ten moderate COPD patients were also tested for comparison (FEV1 = 66 ±â€¯7%pred). DLCO, Vc, and Dm were determined using the multiple-fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) DLCO method at baseline and during steady-state cycle exercise at 40W, 50%, and 80% of V˙O2peak. Using expired gas data, ventilatory inefficiency was assessed by V˙E/V˙CO2. RESULTS: Compared to controls, mild COPD had lower DLCO at baseline and during exercise secondary to diminished Vc (P < 0.05). No difference in Dm was observed between controls and mild COPD at rest or during exercise. Patients with high V˙E/V˙CO2 (i.e. ≥34) had lower Vc and greater dyspnea ratings compared to control at 40W. Moderate COPD patients were unable to increase Vc with increasing exercise intensity, suggesting further pulmonary vascular impairment with increased obstruction severity. CONCLUSION: Despite relatively minor airflow obstruction, mild COPD patients exhibit a diminished DLCO and capillary blood volume response to exercise, which appears to contribute to ventilatory inefficiency and greater dyspnea.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Sanguíneo/fisiología , Capilares , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
5.
J Vis Exp ; (120)2017 02 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28287506

RESUMEN

Exercise is a stress to the pulmonary vasculature. With incremental exercise, the pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCO) must increase to meet the increased oxygen demand; otherwise, a diffusion limitation may occur. The increase in DLCO with exercise is due to increased capillary blood volume (Vc) and membrane diffusing capacity (Dm). Vc and Dm increase secondary to the recruitment and distension of pulmonary capillaries, increasing the surface area for gas exchange and decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance, thereby attenuating the increase in pulmonary arterial pressure. At the same time, the recruitment of intrapulmonary arteriovenous anastomoses (IPAVA) during exercise may contribute to gas exchange impairment and/or prevent large increases in pulmonary artery pressure. We describe two techniques to evaluate pulmonary diffusion and circulation at rest and during exercise. The first technique uses multiple-fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) DLCO breath holds to determine Vc and Dm at rest and during exercise. Additionally, echocardiography with intravenous agitated saline contrast is used to assess IPAVAs recruitment. Representative data showed that the DLCO, Vc, and Dm increased with exercise intensity. Echocardiographic data showed no IPAVA recruitment at rest, while contrast bubbles were seen in the left ventricle with exercise, suggesting exercise-induced IPAVA recruitment. The evaluation of pulmonary capillary blood volume, membrane diffusing capacity, and IPAVA recruitment using echocardiographic methods is useful to characterize the ability of the lung vasculature to adapt to the stress of exercise in health as well as in diseased groups, such as those with pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Arteriovenosa/fisiología , Capilares/fisiología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Capacidad de Difusión Pulmonar/fisiología , Volumen Sanguíneo , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Descanso/fisiología , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA