Prevalence of frailty syndrome in urological patients undergoing major elective surgical procedure due to malignancy.

Introduction: The group of elderly urological patients is growing. A majority of urological operations is performed in this group. The current model of preoperative assessment is developed to be effective in younger groups of patients but not in the elderly. Frailty syndrome has been confirmed to be an effective risk stratification tool in many surgical settings. It can be diagnosed using a variety of screening tools, but the only objective tool is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). However it is time consuming, difficult and to our best knowledge, has not been attempted in Polish urological patients. Material and methods: We assessed the prevalence of frailty in elderly urological patients undergoing surgery due to malignancy using CGA and screening tests. A total of 68 patients over 65 years of age qualified to elective major urological surgery underwent the preoperative assessment including use of traditional tools (medical history, physical examination, ASA score), CGA and frailty-screening tests. The 30-day postoperative complications rate using the Clavien-Dindo scale was also evaluated. Results: The mean age of patients was 71 years. The most common procedures were radical prostatectomy (47.1%), radical nephrectomy (36.6%) and radical cystectomy (11.8%). The prevalence of frailty was 39.7% using CGA and 4.4-10.3% using screening tests. The complication rate was significantly higher in frail individuals when using CGA. Conclusions: Frailty is common in urological elderly patients. The CGA is a time-consuming but reliable tool to diagnose frailty syndrome and predict complications. Screening tests can be useful for selecting patients who should undergo CGA but their predictive value is low.

A Personalized Approach to Radical Cystectomy Can Decrease Its Complication Rates.

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of a patient's general status on perioperative morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy, and to assess which of the used scales is best for the prediction of major complications. The data of 331 patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, who underwent radical cystectomy, were analyzed. The general status was assessed according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), and Geriatric-8 (G-8) scales. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. In a group of patients with the highest complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo scale, (i) statistically more patients rated high according to the ASA and ECOG scales, (ii) patients had significantly higher CCI scores (minor complications (I-II), and (iii) there were significantly more patients rated as frail with G8-predominantly those with 11 points or fewer in the scale. A patient's general status should be assessed before the start of therapy because patients with a high risk of death or serious complications (evaluated with any rating scale) should be offered conservative treatment. None of the scales can describe the risk of cystectomy, because the percentage of patients with major complications among those who achieved worse score results on any scale was not significantly different from the percentage of patients with major complications in the general group.

Frailty, geriatric assessment and prehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing urological surgery - is there a need for change of the daily clinical practice? Synthesis of the available literature.

INTRODUCTION: The population of older people is heterogeneous and constantly growing. Over 50% of urological operations are performed in elderly patients. Some elderly patients present with frailty syndrome - a state of increased vulnerability to external stressors resulting in increased risk of hospitalizations, adverse treatment outcomes and death. Currently, there is no widely accepted system of qualification and preparation for surgical treatment developed specifically for elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Libraries databases from 2000-2020 (week 5). The following medical subject headings (MeSH) terms were used to ensure the sensitivity of the searches: geriatric assessment, frailty, urology, and prehabilitation. Relevant articles were also identified through a manual search of the reference lists of potentially relevant articles. RESULTS: A total of 23 papers met the criteria and were included in the current study. Screening for frailty seems to be promising in predicting adverse outcomes, but frail patients should undergo detailed geriatric assessment (GA) which may indicate a need for preoperative intervention which can be unavailable during the hospitalization. The concept of prehabilitation is becoming increasingly discussed in thoracic and abdominal surgery, but only a few studies are available in the field of urology. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric assessment seems to be a valuable tool for urologists in daily clinical practice. A proper form of prehabilitation may provide enhanced recovery after surgery.

Geriatric assessment among elderly patients undergoing urological surgery: A systematic literature review.

The elderly constitute the group of patients who most often undergo elective urological procedures, and they are at the highest risk of poor surgical outcomes because of comorbidity and frailty. The current model of qualification for surgery is often subjective and based on tools which do not address the characteristics of the elderly. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and screening tools can help in the evaluation of older, particularly frail patients. The aim of the study was to review the literature on the usefulness of preoperative geriatric evaluation in patients undergoing urological treatment. The review was based on MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library bibliographic databases from 2000-2017 for full-text, English-language publications meeting pre-defined criteria. Six prospective and 3 retrospective studies were selected for further analysis. The patient populations, methods of geriatric assessment, interventions, and outcome measures varied between the studies. None of the studies were randomized controlled trials. In 2 studies, the CGA was used; in other studies, rather basic screening tests were used. In only 2 studies, an intervention was performed after the CGA. In general, the variables of the CGA were both prospectively and retrospectively significant predictors of complications of urological surgery. Although the use of CGA is not a standard practice in everyday urological clinical practice, components of the CGA appear to be predictive of postoperative complications. Therefore, inclusion of geriatric assessment as part of routine preoperative care in geriatric urology patients should be considered. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trials on preoperative CGAs in urology patients, further studies are needed.

The Surgical Apgar Score and frailty as outcome predictors in short- and long-term evaluation of fit and frail older patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy - a prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Frailty increases the risk of poor surgical outcomes in the older population. Some intraoperative factors may also influence the final result and can be evaluated. The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) is a simple system predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity. However, the utility of the SAS remains unknown in fit and frail older patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to benign gallbladder diseases. AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of the SAS in predicting 30-day morbidity and 1-year mortality in older fit and frail patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients (≥ 70 years) were enrolled in the prospective study. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was used to diagnose frailty. Logistic regression was conducted to investigate the association between the scores and the outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 144 consecutive older patients with a median age of 76 (range: 70-91) years. The prevalence of frailty was 44.4%. The 30-day mortality and morbidity were 0% and 11.8%, respectively. The 1-year mortality was 6.3% and 7 out of 9 occurred in the frail group. SAS < 7 points was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day postoperative morbidity (OR = 5.1; 95% CI: 1.5-18.1). Age > 85 years (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2-16.4) and frailty (OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.1-19.3) were predictors of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in older fit and frail patients. The SAS, not age, turned out to be the most important predictor of 30-day morbidity. Frailty and age > 85 years were predictors of 1-year mortality. Older patients with SAS < 7 points should be followed meticulously in order to diagnose and treat potential complications early on.

Heart failure, comorbidities, and polypharmacy among elderly nursing home residents.

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) in the elderly is frequently associated with limited therapeutic options and may cause severe complications. Unfortunately, these patients are often excluded from clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between HF, coexisting diseases, and use of medications in patients of advanced age living in nursing homes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group included 79 women and 21 men between 65 and 102 years of age living in 2 nursing homes. Information about the health status of patients was gathered from history and medical records. We conducted a physical examination and, in eligible cases, also an orthostatic test. Comorbidity was assessed using the age­adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). RESULTS: The prevalence of HF was 26%. The number of chronic diseases coexisting with HF was remarkably higher than the number of diseases among patients without HF (median, 6 [0-11] vs. 3 [0-8]; P <0.0001). The ACCI was also higher in the HF group compared with patients without HF (median, 7 [5-12] vs. 5.5 [2-9]; P <0.0001). Patients with HF took significantly more medications, although HF was treated according to the current guidelines in less than half of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that HF is associated with significant morbidity and polypharmacy. There is a need for further research that would guide therapy of HF in elderly patients with limited life expectancy and multiple comorbidities as inhabitants of nursing homes. Nonetheless, the current treatment of nursing home patients with HF seems to be suboptimal.