Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(7): 863-875, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37068548

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Prudent handling of reported antibiotic allergies is an important aspect of antibiotic stewardship. The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) constituted a multidisciplinary expert committee to provide evidence-based recommendations for bedside decision-making in antibiotic therapy in patients that report an antibiotic allergy. METHODS: The guideline committee generated 12 key questions, most of which were population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions relevant to both children and adults with suspected antibiotic allergies. For each question, a systematic literature search was performed and reviewed for the best available evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The quality of evidence was graded from very low to high, and recommendations were formulated in structured discussions as strong or weak. RESULTS: Sixty recommendations were provided for suspected allergy to ß-lactam antibiotics (BLAs) and non-ß-lactam antibiotics. Owing to the absence of randomized controlled trials in this field, the underlying evidence was predominantly graded as low or very low. Available data support that a detailed allergy history should always be performed and critically appraised. When cross-allergy between BLA groups is not to be expected due to the absence of molecular similarity of the side chains, the patient can be safely exposed to the alternative BLA. An exception to this rule is severe delayed-type reactions in which re-exposure to a BLA should only be considered after consultation with a multidisciplinary team. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulated scientific data now support a more liberal approach that better balances the benefits of treatment with first choice and usually smaller spectrum antibiotics with appropriate avoidance of antibiotics in case of a truly high risk of a (severe) allergic reaction. In The Netherlands, a formal guideline was developed that provides recommendations for the approach toward suspected allergy to BLA and frequently used non-ß-lactam antibiotics, thereby strongly supporting antimicrobial stewardship.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0132430, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26208341

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The immunomodulatory effects of the CCR5-antagonist maraviroc might be beneficial in patients with a suboptimal immunological response, but results of different cART (combination antiretroviral therapy) intensification studies are conflicting. Therefore, we performed a 48-week placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of maraviroc intensification on CD4+ T-cell counts and immune activation in these patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. METHODS: Major inclusion criteria were 1. CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/µL while at least two years on cART or CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/µL while at least one year on cART, and 2. viral suppression for at least the previous 6 months. HIV-infected patients were randomized to add maraviroc (41 patients) or placebo (44 patients) to their cART regimen for 48 weeks. Changes in CD4+ T-cell counts (primary endpoint) and other immunological parameters were modeled using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: No significant differences for the modelled increase in CD4+ T-cell count (placebo 15.3 CD4+ T cells/µL (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.0, 29.5] versus maraviroc arm 22.9 CD4+ T cells/µL (95% CI [7.4, 38.5] p = 0.51) or alterations in the expression of markers for T-cell activation, proliferation and microbial translocation were found between the arms. However, maraviroc intensification did increase the percentage of CCR5 expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and the plasma levels of the CCR5 ligand MIP-1ß. In contrast, the percentage of ex-vivo apoptotic CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells decreased in the maraviroc arm. CONCLUSIONS: Maraviroc intensification of cART did not increase CD4+ T-cell restoration or decrease immune activation as compared to placebo. However, ex-vivo T-cell apoptosis was decreased in the maraviroc arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00875368.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa , Ciclohexanos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antagonistas de los Receptores CCR5/uso terapéutico , Relación CD4-CD8 , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/metabolismo , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Inhibidores de Fusión de VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/virología , VIH-1/fisiología , Humanos , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Maraviroc , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores CCR5/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA