RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Impaired sensory integration contributes to balance disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to compare the effects of sensory integration balance training against conventional rehabilitation on balance disorders, the level of balance confidence perceived, quality of life, fatigue, frequency of falls, and sensory integration processing on a large sample of patients with MS. METHODS: This single-blind, randomized, controlled trial involved 80 outpatients with MS (EDSS: 1.5-6.0) and subjective symptoms of balance disorders. The experimental group (n = 39) received specific training to improve central integration of afferent sensory inputs; the control group (n = 41) received conventional rehabilitation (15 treatment sessions of 50 minutes each). Before, after treatment, and at one month post-treatment, patients were evaluated by a blinded rater using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), number of falls and the Sensory Organization Balance Test (SOT). RESULTS: The experimental training program produced greater improvements than the control group training on the BBS (p < 0.001), the FSS (p < 0.002), number of falls (p = 0.002) and SOT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Specific training to improve central integration of afferent sensory inputs may ameliorate balance disorders in patients with MS. Clinical Trial Registration (NCT01040117).
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/rehabilitación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Propiocepción/fisiología , Trastornos de la Sensación/rehabilitación , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Sensación/etiología , Método Simple CiegoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of manual needle placement, electrical stimulation and ultrasonography-guided techniques for botulinum toxin injection into the forearm muscles of adults with arm spasticity. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty chronic stroke patients with wrist and fingers spasticity. INTERVENTION: After randomization into three groups, each patient received botulinum toxin type A in at least two of these muscles: flexor carpi radialis and ulnaris, flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus (no fascicles selection). The manual needle placement group underwent injections using palpation; the electrical stimulation group received injections with electrical stimulation guidance; the ultrasonography group was injected under sonographic guidance. A sole injector was used. MAIN MEASURES: All patients were evaluated at baseline and four weeks after injection. OUTCOMES: Modified Ashworth Scale; Tardieu Scale; wrist and fingers passive range of motion. RESULTS: One month after injection, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved more in the electrical stimulation group than the manual needle placement group (wrist: P = 0.014; fingers: P = 0.011), as well as the Tardieu angle (wrist: P = 0.008; fingers: P = 0.015) and passive range of motion (wrist: P = 0.004). Furthermore, Modified Ashworth Scale scores improved more in the ultrasonography group than in the manual needle placement group (wrist: P = 0.001; fingers: P = 0.003), as well as the Tardieu angle (wrist: P = 0.010; fingers: P = 0.001) and passive range of motion (wrist: P < 0.001; proximal interphalangeal joints: P = 0.009). No difference was found between the ultrasonography and electrical stimulation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Instrumental guidance may improve the outcome of botulinum toxin injections into the spastic forearm muscles of stroke patients.