[Clozapine-induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis].

Tubulointerstitial nephritis is a common cause of acute renal failure, in two thirds of cases it is associated with drugs (mostly antimicrobials and NSAIDs), in 5-10% of cases it is associated with infections (bacterial/viral/parasitic), in 5-10% of cases it is idiopathic (this is the case of the TINU syndrome characterized by interstitial nephritis and bilateral uveitis, and the anti-glomerular basal membrane antibody syndrome), and finally in 10% of cases it is associated with systemic diseases (sarcoidosis, by Sjogren, LES). The pathogenesis is based on a cell-mediated immune response and in most cases removing the causative agent is the gold standard of therapy. However, a percentage of patients, in a variable range from 30% to 70% of cases, do not fully recover renal function, due to the rapid transformation of the interstitial cell infiltrate into vast areas of fibrosis. Clozapine is a second generation atypical antipsycothic usually used for the treatment of schizophrenia resistant to other types of treatment; it can cause severe adverse effects among which the best known is a severe and potentially fatal neutropenia, furthermore a series of uncommon adverse events are recognized including hepatitis, pancreatitis, vasculitis. Cases of acute interstitial tubular nephritis associated with the use of clozapine have been described in the literature, although this complication is rare. Medical personnel using this drug need to be aware of this potential and serious side effect. We describe the case of a 48-year-old man who developed acute renal failure after initiation of clozapine.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are both required for prevention of HCMV disease in seropositive solid-organ transplant recipients.

In solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTR) the protective role of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific CD4+, CD8+ and γδ T-cells vs. HCMV reactivation requires better definition. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevant role of HCMV-specific CD4+, CD8+ and γδ T-cells in different clinical presentations during the post-transplant period. Thirty-nine SOTR underwent virologic and immunologic follow-up for about 1 year after transplantation. Viral load was determined by real-time PCR, while immunologic monitoring was performed by measuring HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (following stimulation with autologous HCMV-infected dendritic cells) and γδ T-cells by flow cytometry. Seven patients had no infection and 14 had a controlled infection, while both groups maintained CD4+ T-cell numbers above the established cut-off (0.4 cell/µL blood). Of the remaining patients, 9 controlled the infection temporarily in the presence of HCMV-specific CD8+ only, until CD4+ T-cell appearance; while 9 had to be treated preemptively due to a viral load greater than the established cut-off (3×10(5) DNA copies/mL blood) in the absence of specific CD4+ T-cells. Polyfunctional CD8+ T-cells as well as Vδ2- γδ T-cells were not associated with control of infection. In conclusion, in the absence of HCMV-specific CD4+ T-cells, no long-term protection is conferred to SOTR by either HCMV-specific CD8+ T-cells alone or Vδ2- γδ T-cell expansion.

Hemodialysis vascular access: everything you always wanted to know about it (but were afraid to ask).

Vascular accesses are essential for effective dialysis treatment. Arteriovenous fistulas, grafts and central venous catheters are the options available to the nephrologist, but they all have their pros and cons. All of the 3 types of vascular access share the same complications but at different rates, and their costs vary enormously, with on balance the arteriovenous fistula being the best choice. Nevertheless, recently the number of incident patients starting dialysis treatment with a venous catheter as vascular access has been steadily increasing. This is true even for more advanced countries such as the United States, where despite the efforts made to promote the use of fistulas, their prevalence is still low compared with Europe. Moreover, nowadays nephrologists are required to master technical skills that once were those of surgeons and to perform interventions to preserve the patency of the access. The aim of this paper is to review the prevalence, benefits and complications of the different vascular accesses in light of the most recent findings.

Kinetics of T-lymphocyte subsets and posttransplant opportunistic infections in heart and kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The potential use of T-lymphocyte measurements as infection risk markers after solid organ transplant has not been fully investigated. We analyzed the kinetics of T-lymphocyte subsets within the first 8 months posttransplant and their correlation with opportunistic infections (OIs) in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: Serial measurement of CD4 and CD8 T cells was performed retrospectively in 48 heart transplant recipients (HTR) and 42 kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Generalized estimating equation models were used to analyze longitudinal data separately for HTR and KTR. RESULTS: An initial CD4 T-cell drop (at months 1 and 2, in HTR and KTR, respectively) coincided with the peak of OIs. HTR with a low nadir CD4 T-cell count (≤ 200/µL) showed poor CD4 T-cell recovery (175 ± 277 cells/µL at baseline vs 242 ± 99 cells/µL at month 8) and their CD8 T cells increased from 153 ± 194 cells/µL at baseline to 601 ± 399 cells/µL at month 8. KTR with a low nadir CD4 T-cell count (≤ 200/µL) showed a modest CD4 T-cell recovery (138 ± 46 cells/µL at baseline vs. 440 ± 448 cells/µL at month 8), and their CD8 T cells increased from 90 ± 41 cells/µL at baseline to 450 ± 242 cells/µL at month 8. HTR developing OIs had lower CD4 (P<0.001) and CD8 T cells (P=0.001) than those without infections, whereas in KTR the risk for OIs seemed restricted to patients with low CD8 T cells. HTR with OIs had a low CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio, whereas KTR had a high CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of T-lymphocyte subsets is a simple and effective parameter to identify patients at risk of developing OIs.