Opportunities to improve the management of anemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: lessons from a national study in routine clinical practice.

Background: Current guidelines establish the same hemoglobin (Hb) and iron biomarkers targets for hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) even though patients having PD are usually younger, more active and less comorbid. Unfortunately, specific renal anemia [anemia in chronic kidney disease (aCKD)] trials or observational studies on PD are scanty. The aims of this study were to describe current aCKD management, goals and adherence to clinical guidelines, identifying opportunities for healthcare improvement in PD patients. Methods: This was a retrospective, nationwide, multicentre study including patients from 19 PD units. The nephrologists collected baseline data, demographics, comorbidities and data related to anemia management (laboratory values, previously prescribed treatments and subsequent adjustments) from electronic medical records. The European adaptation of KDIGO guidelines was the reference for definitions, drug prescriptions and targets. Results: A total of 343 patients (mean age 62.9 years, 61.2% male) were included; 72.9% were receiving ESAs and 33.2% iron therapy [20.7% intravenously (IV)]. Eighty-two patients were receiving ESA without iron therapy, despite 53 of them having an indication according to the European Renal Best Practice guidelines. After laboratory results, iron therapy was only started in 15% of patients. Among ESA-treated patients, 51.9% had an optimal control [hemoglobin (Hb) 10-12 g/dL] and 28.3% between 12-12.9 g/dL. Seventeen patients achieved Hb >13 g/dL, and 12 of them remained on ESA after overshooting. Only three patients had Hb <10 g/dL without ESAs. Seven patients (2%) met criteria for ESA resistance (epoetin dose >300 IU/kg/week). The highest tertile of erythropoietin resistance index (>6.3 UI/kg/week/g/dL) was associated with iron deficiency and low albumin corrected by renal replacement therapy vintage and hospital admissions in the previous 3 months. Conclusion: Iron therapy continues to be underused (especially IV). Low albumin, iron deficiency and prior events explain most of the ESA hyporesponsiveness. Hb targets are titrated to/above the upper limits. Thus, several missed opportunities for adequate prescriptions and adherence to guidelines were identified.

Mortalidad y función renal a largo plazo en pacientes ingresados en la UCI por COVID-19 con fracaso renal agudo, terapia continua de reemplazo renal y ventilación mecánica invasiva / Mortality and renal long-term outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney failure, continuous renal replacement therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation

Introducción: La interacción de COVID-19, ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) y fracaso renal agudo (FRA) con necesidad de terapia continua de reemplazo renal (TCRR) es conocida, pero hay pocos datos publicados sobre el pronóstico a largo plazo de este tipo de FRA.MétodosEste estudio analiza los resultados a largo plazo de 30 pacientes ingresados en la UCI por neumonía por COVID-19, con VMI y FRA con TCRR en el pico de máxima incidencia. Comparamos las características basales, la evolución clínica y bioquímica y los diferentes filtros usados en la TCRR para identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a la muerte intrahospitalaria. Se analizaron el filtrado glomerular estimado (FGe), la proteinuria y la hematuria a los 6meses de seguimiento de los supervivientes.ResultadosDe los 30 pacientes, 19 fallecieron y 11 fueron dados de alta. Los pacientes con peor función renal tuvieron mayor mortalidad (p=0,009). Los filtros usados con capacidad adsortiva no ofrecieron beneficios en cuanto a la supervivencia. De los 11 supervivientes, ninguno requirió terapia renal sustitutiva (TRS) una vez superada la infección, pero tuvieron una pérdida importante y mantenida en el tiempo de función renal (FGe de 44ml/min/1,73 m2).ConclusiónLa mortalidad en pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19 que requieren VMI y TCRR es extremadamente elevada (63%). Los filtros con capacidad adsortiva no modificaron la supervivencia. La función renal basal fue un factor predictor de mortalidad. En este tipo de FRA el deterioro de la función renal no se recupera, objetivándose una reducción importante del FGe a los 6 meses. (AU)

Background: There are limited data describing the long-term renal outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and invasive mechanical ventilation.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study we analyzed the long-term clinical course and outcomes of 30 critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the peak of highest incidence in the first wave, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and AKI that required CRRT. Baseline features, clinical course, laboratory data, therapies and filters used in CRRT were compared between survivors and non-survivors to identify risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Renal parameters: glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and microhematuria were collected at 6months after discharge.Results19 patients (63%) died and 11 were discharged. Mean time to death was 48days (7-206) after admission. Patients with worse baseline renal function had higher mortality (P=.009). Patients were treated with CRRT for an average of 18.4days. Filters with adsorptive capacity (43%) did not offer survival benefits. Regarding long-term renal outcomes, survivor patients did not receive any additional dialysis, but 9 out of 11 patients had an important loss of renal function (median of eGF of 44 (13-76)ml/min/1.73m2) after 6months.ConclusionMortality among critically ill hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 on CRRT is extremely high (63%). Baseline renal function is a predictor factor of mortality. Filters with adsorption capacity did not modify survival. None survivor patients required long-term dialysis, but an important loss of renal function occurred after AKI episode related to COVID-19 infection. (AU)

Mortality and renal long-term outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney failure, continuous renal replacement therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation.

Background: There are limited data describing the long-term renal outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods: In this retrospective observational study we analyzed the long-term clinical course and outcomes of 30 critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the peak of highest incidence in the first wave, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and AKI that required CRRT. Baseline features, clinical course, laboratory data, therapies and filters used in CRRT were compared between survivors and non-survivors to identify risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Renal parameters: glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and microhematuria were collected at 6 months after discharge. Results: 19 patients (63%) died and 11 were discharged. Mean time to death was 48 days (7-206) after admission. Patients with worse baseline renal function had higher mortality (P = 0.009). Patients were treated with CRRT for an average of 18.4 days. Filters with adsorptive capacity (43%) did not offer survival benefits. Regarding long-term renal outcomes, survivor patients did not receive any additional dialysis, but 9 out of 11 patients had an important loss of renal function (median of eGF of 44 (13-76) ml/min/1.73 m2) after 6 months. Conclusion: Mortality among critically ill hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 on CRRT is extremely high (63%). Baseline renal function is a predictor factor of mortality. Filters with adsorption capacity did not modify survival. None survivor patients required long-term dialysis, but an important loss of renal function occurred after AKI episode related to COVID-19 infection.

Introducción: La interacciónde COVID-19, ventilación mecánica invasiva (VMI) y fracaso renal agudo (FRA) con necesidad de terapia continua de reemplazo renal (TCRR) es conocida, pero hay pocos datos publicados sobre el pronóstico a largo plazo de este tipo de FRA. Métodos: Este estudio analiza los resultados a largo plazo de 30 pacientes ingresados en la UCI por neumonía por COVID-19, con VMI y FRA con TCRR en el pico de máxima incidencia. Comparamos las características basales, la evolución clínica y bioquímica y los diferentes filtros usados en la TCRR para identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a la muerte intrahospitalaria. Se analizaron el filtrado glomerular estimado (FGe), la proteinuria y la hematuria a los 6 meses de seguimiento de los supervivientes. Resultados: De los 30 pacientes, 19 fallecieron y 11 fueron dados de alta. Los pacientes con peor función renal tuvieron mayor mortalidad (p = 0,009). Los filtros usados con capacidad adsortiva no ofrecieron beneficios en cuanto a la supervivencia. De los 11 supervivientes, ninguno requirió terapia renal sustitutiva (TRS) una vez superada la infección, pero tuvieron una pérdida importante y mantenida en el tiempo de función renal (FGe de 44 ml/min/1,73 m2). Conclusión: La mortalidad en pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19 que requieren VMI y TCRR es extremadamente elevada (63%). Los filtros con capacidad adsortiva no modificaron la supervivencia. La función renal basal fue un factor predictor de mortalidad. En este tipo de FRA el deterioro de la función renal no se recupera, objetivándose una reducción importante del FGe a los 6 meses.

Mortality and renal long-term outcome of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney failure, continuous renal replacement therapy and invasive mechanical ventilation. / Mortalidad y función renal a largo plazo en pacientes ingresados en la UCI por COVID-19 con fracaso renal agudo, terapia continua de reemplazo renal y ventilación mecánica invasiva.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data describing the long-term renal outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and invasive mechanical ventilation. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study we analyzed the long-term clinical course and outcomes of 30 critically ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the peak of highest incidence in the first wave, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and AKI that required CRRT. Baseline features, clinical course, laboratory data, therapies and filters used in CRRT were compared between survivors and non-survivors to identify risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Renal parameters: glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and microhematuria were collected at 6months after discharge. RESULTS: 19 patients (63%) died and 11 were discharged. Mean time to death was 48days (7-206) after admission. Patients with worse baseline renal function had higher mortality (P=.009). Patients were treated with CRRT for an average of 18.4days. Filters with adsorptive capacity (43%) did not offer survival benefits. Regarding long-term renal outcomes, survivor patients did not receive any additional dialysis, but 9 out of 11 patients had an important loss of renal function (median of eGF of 44 (13-76)ml/min/1.73m2) after 6months. CONCLUSION: Mortality among critically ill hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19 on CRRT is extremely high (63%). Baseline renal function is a predictor factor of mortality. Filters with adsorption capacity did not modify survival. None survivor patients required long-term dialysis, but an important loss of renal function occurred after AKI episode related to COVID-19 infection.

Body composition and ventricular function in hemodialysis patients.

There is no evidence about the potential role of body composition on cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between body composition and changes in ventricular function. We conducted an observational study over a population of 78 patients on chronic hemodialysis. A transthoracic echocardiogram and a bioimpedance were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study. The mean follow-up time was 30.6 months. Patients who had a higher fat tissue index (FTI > 9.20 kg/m2 ) experienced a worsening in right and left ventricular function. They developed a greater fall in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (-1 ± 4.3 mm) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)(-4.2 ± 6.8%), compared to those with lower FTI (p = 0.032 and p = 0.045, respectively). No associations were found between any other echocardiography or body composition parameters and overall mortality. Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (determined as TAPSE) experienced a tendency to higher mortality rate along the study (HR for mortality of 13.5 (95% CI, 1.1-166.7; p = 0.041)]. A higher fat tissue index could be associated with a deleterious effect over right and left ventricular function in dialysis patients.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy in a Kidney Transplant Patient With COVID-19.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for infection, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), given ongoing immunosuppression. In individuals with COVID-19, complications including thrombosis and endothelial dysfunction portend worse outcomes. In this report, we describe a kidney transplant recipient who developed severe thrombotic microangiopathy with a low platelet count (12 ×109/L), anemia (hemoglobin, 7.5 g/dL with 7% schistocytes on peripheral-blood smear), and severe acute kidney injury concurrent with COVID-19. The clinical course improved after plasma exchange. Given this presentation, we hypothesize that COVID-19 triggered thrombotic microangiopathy.

COVID-19: clinical course and outcomes of 36 hemodialysis patients in Spain.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence about the optimal management of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and even less is available in patients on maintenance hemodialysis therapy than in the general population. In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we analyzed the clinical course and outcomes of all maintenance hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from March 12th to April 10th, 2020 as confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Baseline features, clinical course, laboratory data, and different therapies were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors to identify risk factors associated with mortality. Among the 36 patients, 11 (30.5%) died, and 7 were able to be discharged within the observation period. Clinical and radiological evolution during the first week of admission were predictive of mortality. Among the 36 patients, 18 had worsening of their clinical status, as defined by severe hypoxia with oxygen therapy requirements greater than 4 L/min and radiological worsening. Significantly, 11 of those 18 patients (61.1%) died. None of the classical cardiovascular risk factors in the general population were associated with higher mortality. Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors had significantly longer dialysis vintage, increased lactate dehydrogenase (490 U/l ± 120 U/l vs. 281 U/l ± 151 U/l, P = 0.008) and C-reactive protein levels (18.3 mg/dl ± 13.7 mg/dl vs. 8.1 mg/dl ± 8.1 mg/dl, P = 0.021), and a lower lymphocyte count (0.38 ×103/µl ± 0.14 ×103/µl vs. 0.76 ×103/µl ± 0.48 ×103/µl, P = 0.04) 1 week after clinical onset. Thus, the mortality among hospitalized hemodialysis patients diagnosed with COVID-19 is high. Certain laboratory tests can be used to predict a worsening clinical course.