Apixaban concentration variability and relation to clinical outcomes in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.

In some clinical situations, measurements of anticoagulant effect of apixaban may be needed. We investigated the inter- and intra-individual apixaban variability in patients with atrial fibrillation and correlated these results with clinical outcome. We included 62 patients receiving either 5 mg (A5, n = 32) or 2.5 mg (A2.5, n = 30) apixaban twice-daily. We collected three trough and three peak blood samples 6-8 weeks apart. Apixaban concentration was measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and by anti-Xa. Patients on A2.5 were older, had lower creatinine clearance, higher CHA2DS2VASc (4.7 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.7) and lower trough (85 ± 39 vs. 117 ± 53 ng/mL) and peak (170 ± 56 vs. 256 ± 91 ng/mL) apixaban concentrations than patients on A5 (all p < 0.01). In patients on A5, LC-MS/MS showed a significant difference between through levels and between peak levels (p < 0.01). During apixaban treatment, 21 patients suffered bleeding (2 major). There was no association between bleeding and apixaban concentrations or variability. Four patients who suffered thromboembolic event had lower peak apixaban concentrations than patients without it (159 ± 13 vs. 238 ± 88 ng/mL, p = 0.05). We concluded, that there was a significant intra- and inter-individual variability in apixaban trough and peak concentrations. Neither variability nor apixaban concentrations were associated with clinical outcomes.

Intra- and inter- individual rivaroxaban concentrations and potential bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Routine laboratory monitoring of rivaroxaban and dose adjustment relating to exposure is currently not recommended. However, in certain clinical situations, assessment of rivaroxaban levels is desirable. OBJECTIVES: To examine inter- and intra-subject plasma rivaroxaban variability in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to correlate these results to clinical outcomes. PATIENTS/METHODS: We included 60 patients with AF treated with rivaroxaban: half on 20 mg daily (R20) and half on 15 mg daily (R15). Three trough and peak blood samples were collected with an interval of 6-8 weeks apart. Plasma rivaroxaban concentration was measured directly by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and indirectly by anti-Xa for rivaroxaban, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). RESULTS: Patients on R15 were older (76 ± 6 vs 71 ± 6 years), had lower creatinine clearance (60 ± 26 vs 99 ± 32 mL/min), higher CHADS2 (2.5 ± 1.2 vs 1.8 ± 1.3), all p < 0.01, but had similar rivaroxaban concentrations in trough samples to patients on R20. There was no significant intra-individual variability for trough or peak rivaroxaban concentration assessed by LC-MS/MS, anti-Xa, or PT. Trough rivaroxaban levels determined by LC-MS/MS (48 ± 30 vs 34 ± 26, p = 0.02) and anti-Xa, but not with PT and APTT, were higher in patients with bleeding than in patients without it. CONCLUSIONS: There is a pronounced inter-, but not intra-individual variability in the rivaroxaban trough levels in patients with AF. Assessment of trough rivaroxaban concentration with LC-MS/MS or anti-Xa, but not with APTT or PT, may help to identify patients at increased risk of bleeding.