Radiotherapy for central neurocytoma: A multicentric retrospective study in France.

PURPOSE: Neurocytomas represent 0.25 to 0.5% of primary brain tumours and are mainly found in young adults. These tumours have neuronal differentiation. The cornerstone treatment is neurosurgery. The efficacy of other therapies, including radiotherapy, is still unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management of central neurocytomas and the role of radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult patients (age 18 years or older) newly diagnosed with a histologically confirmed neurocytoma between 2006 and 2015 in France were included. RESULTS: One hundred and sixteen patients were diagnosed with a central neurocytoma during the study period. All patients underwent surgical resection, and six received adjuvant radiotherapy. Eleven patients received radiotherapy due to progression. After a median follow-up of 68.7 months, local failure occurred in 29 patients. The 5-year local control rate was 73.4%. According to univariate analysis, marker of proliferation Ki67 index greater than 2% (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.48; confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-1.57; P=0.027) and subtotal resection (HR: 8.48; CI: 8.01-8.99; P<0.001) were associated with an increase in local failure. Gross total resection was associated with a higher risk of sequelae epilepsy (HR: 3.62; CI: 3.42-3.83; P<0.01) and memory disorders (HR: 1.35; CI: 1.07-1.20; P<0.01). Ten patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 10-year overall survival rate was 89.0%. No prognostic factors for overall survival were found. CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that patients who underwent subtotal surgical resection, particularly when the tumour had a Ki67 index greater than 2%, had an increased risk of local recurrence. These patients could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Impact on survival without chemotherapy of local treatments of lung metastasis of colorectal cancers: Analysis on REPULCO cohort.

BACKGROUND: The impact of local management of pulmonary metastases on the disease course of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is poorly assessed. METHODS: REPULCO database was a retrospective cohort on 18 years that included all patients treated for lung metastases from colorectal cancer who received local and/or systemic treatments. AIMS: Primary objective was overall survival, secondary were progression-free survival and survival without chemotherapy. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen patients were analyzed, 157 with only systemic treatments, 78 with only local treatments, and 80 with local and systemic treatments. Overall survival at 5 years was 26.9% (IC95%: [17.7-36.9]) for systemic treatments only, 61.0% (IC95%: [40.8-76.1]) for local treatments only, and 77.8% (IC95%: [60.1-88.3]) for local and systemic treatments. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 4.8% (IC95%: [2.1-9.2]) for systemic treatment only, 28.3% (IC95%: [17.7-39.9]) for local treatments only, and 21.8% (IC95%: [13.1-31.9]) for local and systemic treatments. Median survival without chemotherapy was 2.99 months (IC95%: [2.33-3.68]) for systemic treatments, 33.97 months (IC95%: [19.06-NA]) for local treatments, and 12.85 months (IC95%: [8.18-21.06]) for local and systemic treatments. CONCLUSION: Local treatments of lung metastasis led to prolonged survival and allowed long periods of time without chemotherapy in this cohort.

Approaches to Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to gather the current state of the literature about therapeutic approaches and management of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) studies gained attention and offered a promising outcome alone or in association with antineoplastic drugs especially in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. If one can consider evidence-based medicine as the sole therapeutic option, many unresolved questions are still pending. Thus, therapeutic approaches in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma are still working. Further phase III clinical trials are urgently needed to validate the last 2 phase II involving SBRT and improve knowledge for defining the right care to the right patient at the right time. In addition, a discussion in a disciplinary consultation meeting remains essential to validate the arrangement between systemic treatments and focal treatments that will best benefit the patient.