The cervical spine demonstrates less postoperative bone loss than the lumbar spine.

The objective of this study is to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) changes in adjacent vertebra following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Consecutive patients undergoing ACDF with available preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were included. Quantitative CT measurements of screw-free cervical and first thoracic vertebra were performed. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative BMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV + 1, UIV + 2) and one level below the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV + 1) were assessed. Seventy-two patients (men, 66.7%) met the inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.7% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.0 years. The mean interval (±SD) between surgery and secondary CT was 157 ± 23 days. Preoperative BMD (±SD) in UIV + 1 was 300.6 ± 66.2 mg/cm3 . There was a significant BMD loss of 1.5% at UIV + 1 after surgery, resulting in a postoperative BMD of 296.2 ± 64.8 mg/cm3 (p = .029). At UIV + 2 and LIV + 1, no significant differences between pre- and postoperative BMD (304.7 ± 75.7 mg/cm3 vs. 299.8 ± 74.3 mg/cm3 , 197.3 ± 50.4 mg/cm3 vs. 200.8 ± 48.7 mg/cm3 , p = .113 and p = .078, respectively) were observed. Clinical significance Our results demonstrate a small BMD decrease of 1.5% at UIV + 1. This suggests that the effect of ACDF surgery on the adjacent levels might be smaller compared to the previously described lumbar BMD loss of 10%-20% following posterior lumbar fusion procedures.

Workers' Compensation Status in Association with a High NDI Score Negatively Impacts Post-Operative Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Fusion.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a safe and effective procedure but has approach-related complications like postoperative dysphagia and dysphonia (PDD). Patient-reported outcome measures including the Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) have been used for the assessment of PDD. Various factors have been described that affect ACDF outcomes, and our aim was to investigate the effect of workers' compensation (WC) status. METHODS: We included patients who underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 stratified according to insurance status: WC/non-WC. PDDs were assessed using the HSS-DDI score. We conducted logistic regression analyses. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We included 287 patients, 44 (15.33%) WC and 243 (84.67%) non-WC. A statistical comparison revealed a clinically relevant difference in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (P = 0.015; dysphagia P = 0.021; dysphonia P = 0.002). Additional logistic regression analysis adjusting for preoperative Neck Disability Index scores resulted in no clinically relevant differences in the HSS-DDI total score and both subdomains (total score P = 0.420; dysphagia P = 0.531; dysphonia 0.315). CONCLUSIONS: WC status was associated with a worse HSS-DDI score but could not be shown to be an independent risk factor for PDD. The preoperative NDI score was a strong predictor for PDD with a clinically relevant difference in the HSS DDI score (P < 0.0001). Surgeon awareness of risk factors for PDD such as WC status, even if it could not be shown as independent, is important as it may influence surgical decision making and managing patient expectations.

Local Mechanical Environment and Spinal Trabecular Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography: A Study on Lumbar Lordosis.

OBJECTIVE: There have been some reports on the association between spinal balance parameters and regional bone mineral density (BMD), but the results are controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and regional volumetric BMDs (vBMDs) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in the lumbosacral region of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS: The data of consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative computed tomography was reviewed. QCT measurements were conducted in L1-S1 vertebral trabecular bone. The associations between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and vBMDs were evaluated. Multivariate analyses adjusted with age, gender, race, and body mass index were conducted with vBMD as the response variable. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in the final analyses. Mean age (± standard deviation) was 65.4 ± 11.8 years. Mean vBMD in L1 (± standard deviation) was 118.3 ± 37.4 mg/cm3. After adjusting by cofactors, lumbar lordosis was negatively associated with vBMDs in all levels from L1 to L5 (% regression coefficients and adjusted R2 values: L1, -0.438, 0.268; L2, -0.556, 0.296; L3, -0.608, 0.362; L4, -0.554, 0.228; L5, -0.424, 0.194), but not in S1. Sacral slope was negatively associated with vBMD only at L4 (% coefficient, -0.588; R2, 0.208). Other parameters were not significantly associated with vBMDs at any levels. CONCLUSIONS: Higher lumbar lordosis was associated with lower vBMDs in all lumbar spine levels. Our results suggest that BMD is affected not only by metabolic factors but also by the mechanical environment. Further longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate this effect of vBMD on clinical outcomes.

Skin Ultrasound Measurement as a Potential Marker of Bone Quality: A Prospective Pilot Study of Patients undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Bone mineral density (BMD) is not the sole predictor of fracture development. Qualitative markers including bone collagen maturity contribute to bone fragility. Bone and related type I collagen containing connective tissues degenerate in parallel fashion. With aging, changes in skin collagen content and quality have been observed that can be detected on ultrasound (US) as a decrease in dermal thickness and an increase in reticular layer echogenicity. We hypothesized that US dermal thickness and echogenicity correlate with bone collagen maturity. Data of 43 prospectively enrolled patients (mean age 61 years, 24 females), who underwent instrumented, posterior lumbar fusion was analyzed. Besides preoperative quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and skin US measurements, intraoperative bone biopsies were obtained and analyzed with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Among men, there was no correlation between US measurements and collagen maturity. Among women, dermal layer thickness correlated negatively with collagen maturity in trabecular bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.51, p = 0.01) and vertebra (r = -0.59, p = 0.01) as well as in cortical bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.50, p = 0.02) and vertebra (r = -0.50, p = 0.04). In addition, echogenicity correlated positively with collagen maturity in trabecular vertebral bone (r = 0.59, p = 0.01). In both genders, US measurements showed no correlation with QCT BMD. In summary, ultrasound skin parameters are associated with bone quality factors such as collagen maturity, rather than bone quantity (BMD). Ultrasound of the skin may thereby be an easy and accessible take off point for diagnosis of bone collagen maturity and connective tissue degeneration in the future. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2508-2515, 2019.

Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the lumbar spine is used as an alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density (BMD). The average BMD of L1-L2 is the standard reportable metric used for diagnostic purposes according to current recommendations. The density of L1 and L2 has also been proposed as a reference value for the remaining lumbosacral vertebrae and is commonly used as a surrogate marker for overall bone health. Since regional BMD differences within the spine have been proposed, it is unclear if the L1-L2 average correlates with the remainder of the lumbosacral spine. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine possible BMD variations throughout the lumbosacral spine in patients undergoing lumbar fusion and to assess the correlation between the clinically used L1-L2 average and the remaining lumbosacral vertebral levels. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This is a retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion from 2014 to 2017 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure was BMD measured by QCT. METHODS: Standard QCT measurements at the L1 and L2 vertebra and additional experimental measurements of L3, L4, L5, and S1 were performed. Subjects with missing preoperative lumbar spine CT imaging were excluded. The correlations between the L1-L2 average and the other vertebral bodies of the lumbosacral spine (L3, L4, L5, S1) were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 296 consecutive patients (55.4% female, mean age of 63.1 years) with available preoperative CT were included. The vertebral BMD values showed a gradual decrease from L1 to L3 and increase from L4 to S1 (L1=118.8 mg/cm3, L2=116.6 mg/cm3, L3=112.5 mg/cm3, L4=122.4 mg/cm3, L5=135.3 mg/cm3, S1=157.4 mg/cm3). There was strong correlation between the L1-L2 average and the average of the other lumbosacral vertebrae (L3-S1) with a Pearson's correlation coefficient (r=0.85). We also analyzed the correlation between the L1-L2 average and each individual lumbosacral vertebra. Similar relationships were observed (r value, 0.67-0.87), with the strongest correlation between the L1-L2 average and L3 (r=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate regional BMD differences throughout the lumbosacral spine. Nevertheless, there is high correlation between the clinically used L1-L2 average and the BMD values in the other lumbosacral vertebrae. We, therefore, conclude the standard clinically used L1-L2 BMD average is a useful bone quantity measure of the entire lumbosacral spine in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.

HSS Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) Following Anterior Cervical Fusion: Patient-Derived, Validated, Condition-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Outperforms Existing Indices.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia and dysphonia are common complications after anterior cervical spine surgery; however, reported prevalences vary greatly due to a lack of reliable clinical standards for measuring postoperative swallowing and speech dysfunction. The Hospital for Special Surgery Dysphagia and Dysphonia Inventory (HSS-DDI) was developed as a patient-derived, patient-reported instrument to measure dysphagia and dysphonia more accurately after anterior cervical spine surgery than existing indices. METHODS: This multiphase survey-development study implemented a mixed-methods approach. Phase 1 involved qualitative assessment of postoperative patient-reported swallowing or speaking deficiencies to assemble a draft survey. Phase 2 established test-retest reliability and finalized the 31-item HSS-DDI. Phase 3 compared the HSS-DDI with the Swallowing-Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire and the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) for validity and responsiveness. RESULTS: Phase 1, performed to formulate the draft survey, included 25 patients who were asked about speech and swallowing dysfunction after anterior cervical spine surgery involving at least 3 vertebral levels. Phase 2 included 49 patients who completed the draft survey twice. The mean scores (and standard deviation) for each administration of the HSS-DDI were 67 ± 24 and 75 ± 22, the Cronbach alpha coefficients were both 0.97, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80. The 31-item HSS-DDI was finalized with all but 2 items having weighted kappa values of ≥0.40. Phase 3 included 127 patients and established external validity, with most correlation coefficients between the HSS-DDI and the SWAL-QOL and MDADI ranging from 0.5 to 0.7. Internal validity was established by identifying worsening HSS-DDI scores with increases in the number of vertebral levels involved (p = 0.02) and in the Surgical Invasiveness Index (p = 0.006). HSS-DDI responsiveness ascertained by effect size (0.73) was better than that of the SWAL-QOL and MDADI. The average administration time for the HSS-DDI was 2 minutes and 25 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: The HSS-DDI is efficient, valid, and more responsive to change after anterior cervical spine surgery than existing surveys. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The HSS-DDI fills a gap in postoperative assessment by providing a reliable, more clinically sensitive, patient and condition-specific evaluation of dysphagia and dysphonia prospectively and longitudinally.