DJ-1 interactions with α-synuclein attenuate aggregation and cellular toxicity in models of Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the loss of neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and the presence of Lewy bodies in surviving neurons. These intracellular protein inclusions are primarily composed of misfolded α-synuclein (aSyn), which has also been genetically linked to familial and sporadic forms of PD. DJ-1 is a small ubiquitously expressed protein implicated in several pathways associated with PD pathogenesis. Although mutations in the gene encoding DJ-1 lead to familial early-onset PD, the exact mechanisms responsible for its role in PD pathogenesis are still elusive. Previous work has found that DJ-1--which has protein chaperone-like activity--modulates aSyn aggregation. Here, we investigated possible physical interactions between aSyn and DJ-1 and any consequent functional and pathological relevance. We found that DJ-1 interacts directly with aSyn monomers and oligomers in vitro, and that this also occurs in living cells. Notably, several PD-causing mutations in DJ-1 constrain this interaction. In addition, we found that overexpression of DJ-1 reduces aSyn dimerization, whereas mutant forms of DJ-1 impair this process. Finally, we found that human DJ-1 as well as yeast orthologs of DJ-1 reversed aSyn-dependent cellular toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Taken together, these data suggest that direct interactions between DJ-1 and aSyn constitute the basis for a neuroprotective mechanism and that familial mutations in DJ-1 may contribute to PD by disrupting these interactions.

Novel SPG3A and SPG4 mutations in dominant spastic paraplegia families.

OBJECTIVES: The hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP) are a genetically and clinically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative disorders, mainly characterized by a progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs. Mutations in the SPG4 and SPG3A genes are responsible for approximately 50% of autosomal dominant HSP. To genetically diagnose the Portuguese families with HSP, mutation analysis was performed for the SPG4 and SPG3A genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed by polymerase chain reaction, followed by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), in 61 autosomal dominant (AD)-HSP families and 19 unrelated patients without family history. RESULTS: Ten novel mutations were identified: one in the SPG3A and nine in the SPG4 genes; three known mutations in the SPG4 were also found. Most of the novel mutations were frameshift or nonsense (80%), resulting in a dysfunctional protein. CONCLUSIONS: The SPG4 and SPG3A analysis allowed the identification of 10 novel mutations and the genetic diagnosis of approximately a quarter of our AD-HSP families.