Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Ann Oncol ; 35(2): 200-210, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations are oncogenic drivers of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Pemigatinib is a selective, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 with antitumor activity. We report the efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in the open-label, single-arm, phase II study of previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 alterations (FIGHT-201; NCT02872714). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements (cohort A) and other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B) were included. Patients received pemigatinib 13.5 mg once daily continuously (CD) or intermittently (ID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1 in cohort A-CD. Secondary endpoints included ORR in cohorts A-ID and B, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 260 patients were enrolled and treated (A-CD, n = 101; A-ID, n = 103; B, n = 44; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR status, n = 12). All discontinued treatment, most commonly due to progressive disease (68.5%). ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] in cohorts A-CD and A-ID was 17.8% (10.9% to 26.7%) and 23.3% (15.5% to 32.7%), respectively. Among patients with the most common FGFR3 mutation (S249C; n = 107), ORR was similar between cohorts (A-CD, 23.9%; A-ID, 24.6%). In cohorts A-CD/A-ID, median (95% CI) DOR was 6.2 (4.1-8.3)/6.2 (4.6-8.0) months, PFS was 4.0 (3.5-4.2)/4.3 (3.9-6.1) months, and OS was 6.8 (5.3-9.1)/8.9 (7.5-15.2) months. Pemigatinib had limited clinical activity among patients in cohort B. Of 36 patients with samples available at progression, 6 patients had 8 acquired FGFR3 secondary resistance mutations (V555M/L, n = 3; V553M, n = 1; N540K/S, n = 2; M528I, n = 2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events overall were diarrhea (44.6%) and alopecia, stomatitis, and hyperphosphatemia (42.7% each). CONCLUSIONS: Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Morfolinas , Pirimidinas , Pirroles , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Adolescente , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Genómica
2.
Clin Radiol ; 73(9): 782-791, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29801658

RESUMEN

AIM: To identify combined positron-emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics as a surrogate biomarker of intratumour disease risk for molecular subtype ccA and ccB in patients with primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET/MRI data were analysed retrospectively from eight patients. One hundred and sixty-eight radiomics features for each tumour sampling based on the regionally sampled tumours with 23 specimens were extracted. Sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (SPLS-DA) was applied to feature screening on high-throughput radiomics features and project the selected features to low-dimensional intrinsic latent components as radiomics signatures. In addition, multilevel omics datasets were leveraged to explore the complementing information and elevate the discriminative ability. RESULTS: The correct classification rate (CCR) for molecular subtype classification by SPLS-DA using only radiomics features was 86.96% with permutation test p=7×10-4. When multi-omics datasets including mRNA, microvascular density, and clinical parameters from each specimen were combined with radiomics features to refine the model of SPLS-DA, the best CCR was 95.65% with permutation test, p<10-4; however, even in the case of generating the classification based on transcription features, which is the reference standard, there is roughly 10% classification ambiguity. Thus, this classification level (86.96-95.65%) of the proposed method represents the discriminating level that is consistent with reality. CONCLUSION: Featured with high accuracy, an integrated multi-omics model of PET/MRI-based radiomics could be the first non-invasive investigation for disease risk stratification and guidance of treatment in patients with primary ccRCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Imagen Multimodal , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
World J Urol ; 35(3): 367-378, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27342991

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To review the management of metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) including recent advances in targeted and immune therapies as an update to the 2014 joint international consultation on UTUC, co-sponsored by the Société Internationale d'Urologie and International Consultation on Urological Diseases. METHODS: A PubMed database search was performed between January 2013 and May 2016 related to the treatment of metastatic UTUC, and 54 studies were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: The management of patients with metastatic UTUC is primarily an extrapolation from evidence guiding the management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. The first-line therapy for metastatic UTUC is platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Standard second-line therapies are limited and ineffective. Patients with UTUC who progress following platinum-based chemotherapy are encouraged to participate in clinical trials. Recent advances in genomic profiling present exciting opportunities to guide the use of targeted therapy. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated extremely promising results. Retrospective studies provide support for post-chemotherapy surgery in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: The management of metastatic UTUC requires a multi-disciplinary approach. New insights from genomic profiling using targeted therapies, novel immunotherapies, and surgery represent promising avenues for further therapeutic exploration.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/secundario , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Pelvis Renal , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Gemcitabina
4.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 98(6): 582-9, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26331358

RESUMEN

Reactivated androgen receptor (AR) signaling drives castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The novel AR targeting drugs abiraterone and enzalutamide have improved survival of CRPC patients. However, resistance to these agents develops and patients ultimately succumb to CRPC. Potential mechanisms of resistance include the following: 1) Expression of AR splice variants, such as the AR-V7 isoform, which lacks the ligand-binding domain; 2) AR missense mutations in the ligand-binding domain, such as F876L and T877A; and 3) Mutation or overexpression of androgen biosynthetic enzymes or glucocorticoid receptor. Several novel agents may overcome resistance mechanisms. Galeterone acts through multiple mechanisms that include degradation of AR protein and is being evaluated in CRPC patients positive for AR-V7. EPI-001 and related compounds inhibit AR splice variants by targeting the N-terminal transactivation domain of AR. Promising therapies and novel biomarkers, such as AR-V7, may lead to improved outcomes for CRPC patients.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores Androgénicos/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/efectos adversos , Animales , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Humanos , Ligandos , Masculino , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Receptores Androgénicos/genética , Receptores Androgénicos/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 13(1): 71-9, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24993933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The differential impact of the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy (perioperative or metastatic) is unclear in advanced urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten phase II trials of salvage chemotherapy, biologic agent therapy, or both, enrolling 731 patients, were available. Data on the number of prior lines of therapy and the setting of prior therapy were required in addition to known previously recognized prognostic factors: time from prior chemotherapy, hemoglobin level, performance status, and liver metastasis status. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of the number of prior lines and prior perioperative therapy with overall survival (OS) as the primary clinical endpoint. Trial was a stratification factor. RESULTS: A total of 711 patients were evaluable. The overall median progression-free survival and OS were 2.7 and 6.8 months, respectively. The number of prior lines was 1 in 559 patients (78.6%), 2 in 111 (15.6%), 3 in 29 (4.1%), 4 in 10 (1.4%), and 5 in 2 (0.3%). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was given to 277 (39.1%) and chemotherapy for metastatic disease to 454 (64.1%). The number of prior lines was not independently associated with OS (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.14). Prior perioperative chemotherapy was a favorable factor for OS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The number of prior lines of therapy and prior perioperative chemotherapy were not independently prognostic in patients with urothelial carcinoma receiving salvage therapy. Adoption of these data in salvage therapy trials should enhance accrual, the interpretability of results, and drug development.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia/métodos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Anciano , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Ann Oncol ; 24(9): 2414-21, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23897706

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Variations in urothelial carcinoma (UC) response to platinum chemotherapy are common and frequently attributed to genetic and epigenetic variations of somatic DNA. We hypothesized that variations in germline DNA may contribute to UC chemosensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA from 210 UC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy was genotyped for 80 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Logistic regression was used to examine the association between SNPs and response, and a multivariable predictive model was created. Significant SNPs were combined to form a SNP score predicting response. Eleven UC cell lines were genotyped as validation. RESULTS: Six SNPs were significantly associated with 101 complete or partial responses (48%). Four SNPs retained independence association and were incorporated into a response prediction model. Each additional risk allele was associated with a nearly 50% decrease in odds of response [odds ratio (OR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.39-0.65, P = 1.05 × 10(-7)). The bootstrap-adjusted area under the curves of this model was greater than clinical prognostic factors alone (0.78 versus 0.64). The SNP score showed a positive trend with chemosensitivity in cell lines (P = 0.115). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variants associated with response of UC to platinum-based therapy were identified in germline DNA. A model using these genetic variants may predict response to chemotherapy better than clinical factors alone.


Asunto(s)
Carboplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Femenino , Estudios de Asociación Genética , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Mutación de Línea Germinal/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Urotelio/patología
7.
Ann Oncol ; 20(2): 305-8, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18836088

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) respond to chemotherapy and several months of therapy is required to assess for radiographic response. Blood-based biomarkers may identify patients in whom a specific therapy provides clinical benefit, and this study sought to characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with metastatic UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood from patients with metastatic UC was evaluated for CTCs using the CellSearch system. We assessed for associations between CTC counts and the number and sites of metastatic disease. RESULTS: CTC evaluations were carried out in 33 patients with metastatic UC. Fourteen of 33 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval 27% to 59%) had a positive assay (range 0-87 cells/7.5 ml of blood) with 10 patients (31%) having five or more CTCs. A significantly higher number of CTCs was seen in patients with two or more sites of metastases compared with those with less than one or one site of metastases (3.5 versus 0, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: CTCs, detected by antibody capture technology, are present in 44% of patients with metastatic UC. Higher numbers of CTCs are seen in patients with a greater number of metastatic sites. One-third of patients have five or more CTCs providing a potential early marker to monitor response to chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patología , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Urotelio/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/sangre , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Separación Inmunomagnética , Pelvis Renal/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/sangre , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neoplasias/sangre , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Uréter/patología , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/sangre , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología
8.
Cancer Res ; 61(8): 3294-8, 2001 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11309283

RESUMEN

G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists such as neuropeptides activate the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) or the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt, suggesting that neuropeptides-GPCR signaling can cross-communicate with IGF-IR-Akt signaling pathways. Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 (NEP) is a cell-surface peptidase that cleaves and inactivates the neuropeptides endothelin-1 (ET-1) and bombesin, which are implicated in progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer (PC). We investigated the mechanisms of NEP regulation of neuropeptide-mediated cell survival in PC cells, including whether neuropeptide substrates of NEP induce phosphorylations of IGF-IR and Akt in PC cells. Western analyses revealed ET-1 and bombesin treatment induced phosphorylation of IGF-IRbeta and Akt independent of IGF-I in TSU-Pr1, DU145, and PC-3 PC cells, which lack NEP expression, but not in NEP-expressing LNCaP cells. Recombinant NEP and induced NEP expression in TSU-Pr1 cells using a tetracycline-repressive expression system inhibited ET-1-mediated phosphorylation of IGF-IRbeta and Akt, and blocked the protective effects of ET-1 against apoptosis induced by serum starvation. Incubation of TSU-Pr1 cells with specific kinase inhibitors together with ET-1 or bombesin showed that IGF-IR activation is required for neuropeptide-induced Akt phosphorylation, and that neuropeptide-induced Akt activation is predominantly mediated by Src and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase but not by mitogen-activated protein kinase or protein kinase C. These data show that the neuropeptides ET-1 and bombesin stimulate ligand-independent activation of the IGF-IR, which results in Akt activation, and that this cross-communication between GPCR and IGF-IR signaling is inhibited by NEP.


Asunto(s)
Bombesina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Endotelina-1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neprilisina/fisiología , Proteínas Serina-Treonina Quinasas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/fisiología , Receptor IGF Tipo 1/fisiología , Bombesina/farmacología , Supervivencia Celular/fisiología , Endotelina-1/farmacología , Activación Enzimática , Humanos , Masculino , Fosforilación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/enzimología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt , Receptor IGF Tipo 1/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/fisiología , Activación Transcripcional , Células Tumorales Cultivadas , Familia-src Quinasas/metabolismo
9.
Curr Treat Options Oncol ; 2(5): 437-45, 2001 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12057107

RESUMEN

Advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a disease that is highly resistant to systemic therapy and is difficult to treat. Nephrectomy should be seriously considered in patients who present with metastatic disease prior to systemic therapy, and surgery remains a reasonable option in patients who present with resectable metastases. Numerous studies with many different treatment modalities, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy, have failed to consistently benefit patients, with no single agent or combination therapy showing a reproducible response proportion of 20% or higher. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-alfa (IFN alfa)-based therapies remain the most commonly used agents to treat patients with advanced disease, demonstrating low but reproducible response proportions in the 10% to 20% range, with durable responses of 5% or less. Recent randomized studies demonstrate a survival advantage for patients receiving systemic IFN-based therapy, but this advantage is marginal. Novel treatment strategies are being investigated, with some encouraging early results using vaccines and allogeneic bone marrow transplant. The identification of new agents with more effective antitumor activity is a high priority in the treatment of advanced RCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Inmunoterapia Activa , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-2/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Nefrectomía , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...