Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 100(9): 1138-47, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23775340

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The multidisciplinary management of metastatic melanoma now occasionally includes major hepatic resection. The objective of this work was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on liver resection for metastatic melanoma. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched (1990 to December 2012). Studies with at least ten patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic melanoma were included. Data on the outcomes of overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were abstracted and synthesized. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from survival curves and subjected to meta-analysis using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies involving 579 patients (13 per cent weighted resection rate) who underwent liver resection were included. Study quality was poor to moderate. Median follow-up ranged from 9 to 59 months. Median DFS ranged from 8 to 23 months, and median OS ranged from 14 to 41 months (R0, 22-66 months, R2, 10-16 months; R0 versus R1/R2: HR 0.52, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.37 to 0.73). The OS rate was 56-100 per cent at 1 year, 34-53 per cent at 3 years and 11-36 per cent at 5 years. Median OS with non-operative management ranged from 4 to 12 months. Comparison of OS with resection and non-operative management favoured resection (HR 0.32, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.46). CONCLUSION: Radical resection of liver metastases from melanoma appears to improve overall survival compared with non-operative management or incomplete resection, but this observation requires future confirmation as selection bias may have confounded the results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Melanoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hepatectomía/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Surg Gynecol Obstet ; 172(3): 215-9, 1991 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1994497

RESUMEN

Portasystemic (PS) shunts have been regarded as a relative contraindication to hepatic transplantation (HT) because of the potential for increased technical difficulties during the transplant operation. We compared operative blood loss, morbidity and mortality in 27 patients with PS shunts and 147 patients with no shunts (NS) who underwent HT. The PS shunt group included 12 portocaval (PC), eight mesocaval, four central splenorenal and four distal splenorenal shunts. The PS shunt and NS groups were similar with respect to age, preoperative medical status and ABO blood group matching between donors and recipients. There were no significant differences in the mean (plus or minus S.D.) intraoperative blood transfusion (9.1 +/- 7.6 versus 9.2 +/- 11.0 units), mean (plus or minus S.D.) duration of anesthesia (8.1 +/- 1.4 versus 7.8 +/- 1.5 hours) and operative mortality (7 versus 11 per cent) between the PS shunt and NS groups, respectively. Complications of the biliary tract were significantly higher in the PS shunt group (22.0 versus 5.4 per cent, p less than 0.01) but they did not increase the mortality rate. We conclude that a prior PS shunt should not influence the decision to accept patients for HT. PS shunts remain a reasonable surgical option for patients with cirrhosis and variceal hemorrhage (refractory to sclerotherapy) who, by virtue of good hepatic function, do not merit immediate HT.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Derivación Portosistémica Quirúrgica , Análisis Actuarial , Adulto , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Contraindicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación Portosistémica Quirúrgica/métodos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Transplantation ; 49(2): 377-81, 1990 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2305468

RESUMEN

The function and outcome of liver grafts from "older" donors (more than 50 years old) were compared with grafts from younger donors (less than 50 years old). Of 184 consecutive liver transplants, 23 grafts were from older donors (50.2-65.3 years, mean 54.3 years). The liver preservation period was short, averaging less than 4 hr with the maximum under 8 hr for the older grafts. The majority of livers were preserved with Collins' solution. All transplants were performed using consistent methods that had proved to be successful over time. The medical status of the patients who received the older and younger grafts was similar but a higher percentage of older grafts were transplanted into ABO blood group--incompatible recipients. Graft function--as determined by peak aminotransferase levels, duration of prolonged prothrombin time, retransplantation rate within 30 days and incidence of primary nonfunction--was not significantly different in older versus younger grafts. Actual 30-day graft survival was 86.9% in the older grafts and 85.1% in the younger grafts. Actuarial 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 65.0% and 71.4%, respectively, in recipients of older grafts and 68.8% and 75.6%, respectively, in recipients of younger grafts. It is concluded that donor livers older than 50 years can be transplanted with the same success as younger livers provided that other generally accepted donor criteria are satisfied and the preservation period is short. The upper age limit for liver donation is not yet known.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Donantes de Tejidos , Factores de Edad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Hígado/fisiología , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preservación de Órganos , Análisis de Supervivencia
6.
Lancet ; 335(8683): 181-4, 1990 Jan 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1967664

RESUMEN

A patient with the short-gut syndrome and antithrombin III deficiency underwent small bowel and liver grafting a year ago. Transient, mild graft-versus-host disease and intestinal rejection occurred within 2 months of grafting and were easily managed. Parenteral nutrition was discontinued 8 weeks after surgery. The patient has maintained normal nutritional indices while on an unrestricted oral diet. Small-bowel/liver grafting is feasible for patients with the short-gut syndrome and associated liver disorders. Further experience is needed to determine the specific risks, benefits, and general applicability of this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Intestino Delgado/trasplante , Trasplante de Hígado , Síndromes de Malabsorción/cirugía , Síndrome del Intestino Corto/cirugía , Adulto , Grasas/análisis , Heces/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/metabolismo , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Monitorización Inmunológica , Pronóstico , Reoperación , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Xilosa/orina
9.
Can J Surg ; 32(2): 97-100, 1989 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2493330

RESUMEN

Refinements in biliary tract reconstruction and the frequent use of cholangiography have produced a marked decline in the number of deaths from biliary complications after liver transplantation. The authors' method of reconstruction differs from those of others in that it employs no stents or T tubes and retains the donor gallbladder, allowing access to the biliary tract for radiologic purposes in the post-transplant period. In a series of 161 consecutive liver transplants, the frequency of biliary complications was 13.6% (15 anastomotic and 7 gallbladder-related). Of three deaths that occurred in patients with biliary complications, one was due to the complication itself. A Roux-en-Y reconstruction with anastomosis to the donor duct was associated with the lowest anastomotic complication rate (2.2%). Upper abdominal surgery before transplantation, especially shunting, was a major risk factor for biliary complications.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar , Trasplante de Hígado , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis en-Y de Roux/efectos adversos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Yeyuno/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Clin Transpl ; : 45-51, 1988.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3154493

RESUMEN

Patients who currently benefit the most from liver transplantation are those with end-stage, non-malignant liver disease. Primary biliary cirrhosis and cirrhosis from chronic active hepatitis (hepatitis B negative) have been the most common indications in our experience. Overall survival rates in excess of 70% at 1 year are now common and those patients who live the first year have a very good prospect of long-term survival. Complete rehabilitation occurs in about 80% of survivors. Patients on life support systems before transplantation and those awaiting urgent retransplantation have the highest mortality rates. Modern anesthetic and surgical techniques have made the operation much safer and more straightforward. Biliary tract complications remain common, especially in patients with a history of previous upper abdominal surgery. Cyclosporine has had a major impact, but in the context of its use in combination with other immunosuppressive agents (antilymphocyte globulin, steroids, azathioprine and OKT3).


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis Actuarial , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Lactante , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Ontario/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA