Comparison of the efficacy of first­/second­generation EGFR­tyrosine kinase inhibitors and osimertinib for EGFR­mutant lung cancer with negative or low PD­L1 expression.

In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with negative or low programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, the acquisition rate of the T790M mutation is higher after treatment with first-/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the progression-free survival (PFS) is longer in patients treated with osimertinib. The present study compared the clinical course after the initiation of each EGFR-TKI monotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. Data of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression who were treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed. Between June 2013 and November 2023, 26 and 29 patients were treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib, respectively. The PFS time was longer in patients treated with osimertinib (median, 22.5 months) than in those treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 12.9 months). However, the EGFR-TKI treatment duration, defined as the PFS for osimertinib, or the sum of the PFS for first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and sequential osimertinib therapy after the acquisition of the T790M mutation, was similar between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs (median, 23.0 months) and osimertinib (median, 22.5 months). The Cox proportional hazard model suggested that there was no significant difference in the EGFR-TKI treatment duration between patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and patients treated with osimertinib (hazard ratio, 1.31, 95% CI, 0.55-3.13). In conclusion, first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs and osimertinib were associated with a similar EGFR-TKI treatment duration in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with negative or low PD-L1 expression. The findings suggested that both treatments are promising for this population.

Pure Red Cell Aplasia and Chromosomal Abnormality in a Patient With Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce immune-related adverse events in various organs, thus careful observation is required. CASE REPORT: A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and treated with combined therapy of carboplatin plus pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab. After two cycles of treatment, anemia was noted. Myelosuppression due to cytotoxic anticancer agents was suspected and the cytotoxic agents were discontinued, followed by three courses of pembrolizumab monotherapy. However, the anemia persisted, requiring red blood cell transfusions. A bone marrow biopsy revealed erythroblast hypoplasia and chromosomal abnormalities, resulting in a diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. These adverse events were considered immune-related because of the treatment history with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and 60 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day) of prednisolone was initiated. Anemia improved, and it did not recur during the tapering of prednisolone. CONCLUSION: Immune-related pure red cell aplasia should be considered for patients presenting anemia during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Ineligible for Platinum Doublet Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Combined therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum doublet chemotherapy has a survival advantage over platinum doublet chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, a variety of factors make it difficult to administer treatment with platinum doublet chemotherapy in many patients in clinical practice and there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients who are ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy. This observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the survival and adverse events from the initiation of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, including pembrolizumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy. RESULTS: Data from 48 patients were analyzed. Seventeen patients showed a performance status (PS) of ≥2 while 16 and 15 patients were considered ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy because of age and comorbidities, respectively. The median (95% confidential interval, CI) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 48 patients were 7.1 (1.7-13.7) and 31.7 (8.8-not estimated) months, respectively. The two-year PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 30.8% (18.2%-47.2%) and 50.7% (33.7%-67.7%), respectively. In patients with a PS of ≥2, the median (95% CI) PFS and OS were 1.6 (1.2-not estimated) and 5.5 (2.3-not estimated) months, respectively. The two-year PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 34.3% (15.8%-59.2%) and 45.3% (22.2%-70.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a PS of 0-1 who were ineligible for platinum doublet chemotherapy had favorable outcome after the initiation of ICI therapy, and even in patients with a PS of ≥2, they achieved high two-year PFS and OS rates.