Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Pediatr ; 179(2): 293-301, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31728675

RESUMEN

Oral sucrose is included in almost all recommendations for treatment of pain in newborns, but evidence if multiple doses might be more effective than a single standard dose is lacking. We designed a single-centre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. We enrolled preterm infants needing the heel prick procedure. Each enrolled infant was randomised to receive a single standard dose of sucrose 2 min before or a double dose of sucrose 2 min before, and 30 s after heel prick. Primary outcome was the efficacy of the two interventions tested by the premature infant pain profile-PIPP scale obtained at 30 s, 60 s, and 120 s after heel prick. Secondary outcome was the evaluation of the concordance between the PIPP scale and other pain scores more feasible in clinical practice. Seventy-two infants were randomised. No difference in pain perception as measured by the PIPP scale was found between the groups: median PIPP values 4.0(IQR 3.0-4.0) vs 3.0(IQR 3.0-4.0) at baseline; 6.0(IQR 5.0-10.0) vs 6.0(IQR 4.0-8.5) at 30 s; 6.0(IQR 4.0-7.0) vs 5.0(IQR 4.0-8.5) at 60 s and 5.0(IQR 4.0-7.0) vs 5.0(IQR 4.0-7.5) at 2 min, in the experimental and standard treatment groups, respectively (p = 0.9020). There was no correlation between PIPP scores and other pain scales.Conclusion: We do not recommend doubling the dose during heel prick.What is Known:• Oral sucrose is included in almost all international position papers and recommendations for the treatment of mild to moderate pain in newborns, associated with non-nutritive sucking and facilitated tucking• Premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scale is the gold standard for evaluation of pain in preterms but it is difficult to use in clinical practiceWhat is New:• Repeating a dose of 24% sucrose is not effective in reducing pain during the recovery phase of a skin breaking procedure• Other pain scales, easier to use in clinical practice, are not comparable with PIPP for the evaluation of procedural pain in preterms.


Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Punciones/efectos adversos , Sacarosa/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Talón , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Italia , Masculino , Agujas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
2.
Acta Paediatr ; 104(1): 47-52, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25178836

RESUMEN

AIM: This study determined the predictors associated with the decision to perform a computed tomography (CT) scan in children with a minor head injury (MHI). We focused on those facing an intermediate risk of clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI), according to the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) prediction rule. METHODS: A 1-year, cross-sectional study was performed in an Italian paediatric emergency department, focusing on children presenting within 24 h of an MHI and meeting the PECARN intermediate-risk criteria. RESULTS: We included 308 children, and 47% were younger than 2 years of age. CT scans were carried out on 13%, 1.3% had a ciTBI and one was initially missed but did not need neurosurgery following diagnosis. Single and multiple PECARN intermediate-risk predictors were not associated with whether a CT scan was carried out. The only clinical variable associated with the decision to perform a CT scan was if the child was <3 months of age (OR 18.1, 95% CI, 4.91-66.61). CONCLUSION: The PECARN intermediate-risk predictors did not play a major role in the decision to perform a CT scan. The only factor significantly associated with the decision to perform a CT scan was when the patient was younger than 3 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Algoritmos , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 19(7): 801-7, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22724450

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Of the currently published clinical decision rules for the management of minor head injury (MHI) in children, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule, derived and validated in a large multicenter prospective study cohort, with high methodologic standards, appears to be the best clinical decision rule to accurately identify children at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI) in the pediatric emergency department (PED). This study describes the implementation of an adapted version of the PECARN rule in a tertiary care academic PED in Italy and evaluates implementation success, in terms of medical staff adherence and satisfaction, as well as its effects on clinical practice. METHODS: The adapted PECARN decision rule algorithms for children (one for those younger than 2 years and one for those older than 2 years) were actively implemented in the PED of Padova, Italy, for a 6-month testing period. Adherence and satisfaction of medical staff to the new rule were calculated. Data from 356 visits for MHI during PECARN rule implementation and those of 288 patients attending the PED for MHI in the previous 6 months were compared for changes in computed tomography (CT) scan rate, ciTBI rate (defined as death, neurosurgery, intubation for longer than 24 hours, or hospital admission at least for two nights associated with TBI) and return visits for symptoms or signs potentially related to MHI. The safety and efficacy of the adapted PECARN rule in clinical practice were also calculated. RESULTS: Adherence to the adapted PECARN rule was 93.5%. The percentage of medical staff satisfied with the new rule, in terms of usefulness and ease of use for rapid decision-making, was significantly higher (96% vs. 51%, p<0.0001) compared to the previous, more complex, internal guideline. CT scan was performed in 30 patients (8.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]=6% to 11.8%) in the implementation period versus 21 patients (7.3%, 95% CI=4.8% to 10.9%) before implementation. A ciTBI occurred in three children (0.8%, 95% CI=0.3 to 2.5) during the implementation period and in two children (0.7%, 95% CI=0.2 to 2.5) in the prior 6 months. There were five return visits (1.4%) postimplementation and seven (2.4%) before implementation (p=0.506). The safety of use of the adapted PECARN rule in clinical practice was 100% (95% CI=36.8 to 100; three of three patients with ciTBI who received CT scan at first evaluation), while efficacy was 92.3% (95% CI=89 to 95; 326 of 353 patients without ciTBI who did not receive a CT scan). CONCLUSIONS: The adapted PECARN rule was successfully implemented in an Italian tertiary care academic PED, achieving high adherence and satisfaction of medical staff. Its use determined a low CT scan rate that was unchanged compared to previous clinical practice and showed an optimal safety and high efficacy profile. Strict monitoring is mandatory to evaluate the long-lasting benefit in patient care and/or resource utilization.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/terapia , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Algoritmos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Preescolar , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/complicaciones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Toma de Decisiones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Lactante , Italia , Masculino , Pediatría , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Acta Paediatr ; 101(3): 271-7, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21950707

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate the incidence of bacteremia, and the isolated pathogens, in well-appearing children with fever without source (FWS) presenting to the pediatric emergency department (PED), after pneumococcal conjucate vaccine - 7 valent (PCV-7) widespread introduction in the Veneto region of north-eastern Italy, and to review the main literature contributions on the subject. METHODS: Blood cultures performed at the PED of Padova from 1 June 2006 to 31 January 2009 in febrile children aged 1-36 months were retrospectively retrieved. Medical records of previously healthy well-appearing children with FWS were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: The study finally included 392 patients. Bacteremia rate was 0.34% (95% CI 0-1) in the age group 3-36 months and 2% (95% CI 0-4.7) in infants 1-3 months. No Streptococcus pneumoniae was isolated. The literature review identified 10 relevant studies carried out in the USA and Spain showing an overall bacteremia rate <1% for feverish children aged 3-36 months, with values <0.5% in settings with high PCV-7 coverage. CONCLUSION: Overall bacteremia rate is currently <0.5% in well-appearing children aged 3-36 months with FWS attending the PED in areas with PCV-7 widespread vaccination and is sufficiently low to preclude laboratory testing in favour of close follow-up. Further research is needed to evaluate a more conservative approach in infants 2-3 months of age.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Fiebre/microbiología , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Preescolar , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Infecciones Neumocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación , Vacunas Conjugadas
5.
Acta Paediatr ; 100(11): e238-40, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21535132

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated mucositis (MPAM), previously labelled as atypical Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), SJS with minimal or no skin manifestations, is a rare non-respiratory manifestation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. The nineteen cases described so far in children and young adults were characterized by a high male gender prevalence (16/19) and a good response to appropriate antibiotic treatment and supportive care in the majority of patients. We describe a case of MPAM in a previously healthy girl, who improved after a 0.5 g/kg daily dose of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) for four consecutive days, after traditional therapy had failed. CONCLUSION: The successful treatment with IVIG described in this report suggests that, where appropriate antibiotic and supportive therapy fails to improve the clinical course of severe MPAM, IVIG treatment is worth considering.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Mucositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Mucositis/diagnóstico , Mucositis/microbiología , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/microbiología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA