Embryonic Aneuploidy after Preimplantation Genetic Screening: Age- and Indication-Matched Comparative Study between Indian and Spanish Population.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show that there are differences in female fertility in different ethnic groups with ovarian aging and IVF treatment outcomes. Advanced maternal age is a known risk factor for miscarriage, accounting largely due to genetically abnormal fetus. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigates if there are any differences in rates of embryo aneuploidy based on age and indications for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) between Indian and Spanish women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was carried out at fertility centers in India and Spain. Data from autologous IVF cycles of women <45 years age (Spanish: 39.4 ± 3.8 years; Indian: 35.3 ± 4.6 years) were included. A total of 37,962 embryos from 7009 IVF cycles from Spain and 1894 embryos from 308 IVF cycles from India, having similar clinical indications, underwent similar IVF treatment protocol. The embryos were analyzed by PGS using either a day-3 or day-5/6 embryo biopsy. RESULTS: Both Indian and Spanish ethnic population showed a reduction in aneuploidy rate in day-5/6 biopsy compared with day-3 biopsy (Spanish: 53.3% vs. 81.1%, P < 0.01; Indian: 50% vs. 75%, P < 0.02). There was a significant decrease in highly abnormal or chaotic embryos in trophectoderm biopsies compared with day-3 biopsies (Spanish: 2% vs. 16.1%, P < 0.01; Indian: 2.5% vs. 17.7%, P < 0.01). Both the populations showed similar trend in aneuploidy rate with maternal age. The results showed no significance between aneuploidy rate compared within different age groups and indications. However, there was a significant reduction in the miscarriage rate in Spanish population in day-3 biopsy compared with Indian population (10.7% vs. 19.8%; P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval [0.0044-0.0712]). There were no differences in the clinical outcomes compared between the two populations. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the aneuploidy rates between Indian and Spanish women of the same age group undergoing IVF treatment do not differ. An in-depth analysis to compare the types of anomalies reported with PGS in both the population will be of much interest.

New tools for embryo selection: comprehensive chromosome screening by array comparative genomic hybridization.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The study included 1420 CCS cycles for recurrent miscarriage (n = 203); repetitive implantation failure (n = 188); severe male factor (n = 116); previous trisomic pregnancy (n = 33); and advanced maternal age (n = 880). CCS was performed in cycles with fresh oocytes and embryos (n = 774); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes (n = 320); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-2 embryos (n = 235); and mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-3 embryos (n = 91). Day-3 embryo biopsy was performed and analyzed by aCGH followed by day-5 embryo transfer. Consistent implantation (range: 40.5-54.2%) and pregnancy rates per transfer (range: 46.0-62.9%) were obtained for all the indications and independently of the origin of the oocytes or embryos. However, a lower delivery rate per cycle was achieved in women aged over 40 years (18.1%) due to the higher percentage of aneuploid embryos (85.3%) and lower number of cycles with at least one euploid embryo available per transfer (40.3%). We concluded that aneuploidy is one of the major factors which affect embryo implantation.

The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.

Largely because of efforts required to complete the Human Genome Project, DNA sequencing has undergone a steady transformation with still-ongoing developments of high-throughput sequencing machines for which the cost per reaction is falling drastically. Similarly, the fast-changing landscape of reproductive technologies has been improved by genetic approaches. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening were established more than two decades ago for selecting genetically normal embryos to avoid inherited diseases and to give the highest potential to achieve stable pregnancies. Most recent additions to the IVF practices (blastocyst/trophectoderm biopsy, embryo vitrification) and adoption of new genetics tools such as array comparative genome hybridization have allowed setting up more precise and efficient programs for clinical embryo diagnosis. Nevertheless, there is always room for improvements. Remarkably, a recent explosion in the release of advanced sequencing benchtop platforms, together with a certain maturity of bioinformatics tools, has set the target goal of sequencing individual cells for embryo diagnosis to be a realistically feasible scenario for the near future. Next-generation sequencing technology should provide the opportunity to simultaneously analyze single-gene disorders and perform an extensive comprehensive chromosome screening/diagnosis by concurrently sequencing, counting, and accurately assembling millions of DNA reads.

Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening. Most methods of embryo viability assessment involve morphologic evaluation at different preimplantation developmental stages. A weak association between blastocyst morphology and aneuploidy has been described, supporting the basis for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for assessment of embryo viability. The expected improvement in reproductive outcome rates has been reached with the application of microarrays based on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in clinical routine PGS. DESIGN: Review of published studies and own unpublished data. SETTING: University-affiliated private institution. PATIENT(S): IVF patients undergoing PGS at different stages. INTERVENTION(S): PGS with polar body, cleavage-stage, and blastocyst biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Aneuploidy, implantation, and pregnancy rates. RESULTS: The clinical outcome after analysis of all 24 chromosomes improved pregnancy and implantation rates for different indications to a higher degree than the previously available technology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), in which only a limited number of chromosomes could be analyzed. CONCLUSION(S): Most of the data regarding the controversy of day-3 biopsy come from FISH cycles, and the utility of day-3 biopsy with new array-CGH technology should be further evaluated through randomized controlled trials. The current trend is blastocyst biopsy with a fresh transfer or vitrification for transfer in a nonstimulated cycle.

False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3.

In this work, false positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for its use in day-3 single-blastomere analysis was calculated. For this purpose, 38 embryos diagnosed as abnormal on day-3 by FISH were re-biopsied on day-4. Single-cell day-4 arrayCGH diagnosis was then performed. A successful amplification was obtained in 97.4 % (37/38) of the day-4 cells analysed by arrayCGH. Day-3 FISH and day-4 arrayCGH diagnosis were concordant in 35/37 cases. The two discordant embryos were spread and all the cells from each embryo were re-analysed by FISH on day 5. The same error rate (2.7 %) for day-3 FISH and day-4 arrayCGH was obtained when comparing day-5 FISH re-analysis. After this pre-clinical phase, the platform was used for day-3 arrayCGH clinical application in 320 patients (1,760 embryos). Day-3 amplification rate was 98.6 %. An optimal reproductive outcome was obtained when applying arrayCGH to a clinical program: clinical pregnancy rate per cycle of 38.4 % and 60.3 % per transference were obtained, with an implantation rate of 53.5 %. Overall miscarriage rate was 10.6 %. Additionally, day-5 FISH re-analysis was performed in 42 of the embryos from the clinical phase, obtaining a concordance rate of 97.6 % with day-3 arrayCGH.

Redefining advanced maternal age as an indication for preimplantation genetic screening.

In this retrospective study, the utility of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in patients with advanced maternal age is evaluated. The patient population consisted of women aged 38-44years and included in a regular IVF programme with or without PGS analysis. Transfer rate, ongoing implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were the main outcome parameters measured. A trend of better ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was observed in patients aged 38 and 39years in the non-PGS group when compared with PGS groups, but better ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was observed in patients 41-44years old in the PGS group. When patients with a low ovarian response accumulated oocytes in several stimulation cycles, clinical outcomes were comparable to those of normal-responder patients. These results show that, although PGS does not benefit patients less than 40years of age, reproductive success increases more than two-fold in patients over 40years, especially in patients with more than six metaphase II oocytes, as a result of a good ovarian response or gamete accumulation, suggesting a redefinition of advanced maternal age as indication for PGS. In this retrospective study, the utility of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in patients with advanced maternal age is evaluated. Patient population consisted of women aged 38-44 years and included in a regular IVF programme with or without PGS analysis. Transfer rate, ongoing implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were the main outcome parameters measured. A trend of better ongoing pregnancy rate per ovarian stimulation cycle was observed in patients aged 38-39 years in the non-PGS group when compared with PGS groups, but better ongoing implantation rate was observed in patients aged 41-44 years old in the PGS group. When patients with a low ovarian response (low number of oocytes available for the IVF cycle) accumulated oocytes in several stimulation cycles, their reproductive possibilities were comparable to those of normal-responder patients. These results show that, although PGS does not benefit patients less than 40 years of age, reproductive success increases more than 2-fold in patients over 40 years, especially in patients with more than six metaphase II oocytes, as a result of a good ovarian response or gamete accumulation, suggesting a redefinition of advanced maternal age as indication for PGS.

Prognostic factors for preimplantation genetic screening in repeated pregnancy loss.

The objective of this study was to identify specific subgroups of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients of unknown aetiology in whom the selection of chromosomally normal embryos for transfer improves reproductive outcome in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). A total of 428 PGS cycles were included and chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y were evaluated. In RPL patients < or =37 years, a lower incidence of chromosomal abnormalities (P = 0.0004) and miscarriages (P = 0.0283) was observed, and there were significantly higher pregnancy (P < 0.0384) and implantation (P < 0.0434) rates than in patients >37 years. In the former subset, results showed: (i) significantly higher implantation rates (P = 0.0411) in couples that had experienced a previous aneuploid miscarriage; (ii) similar aneuploidy, pregnancy and implantation rates in couples suffering previous miscarriages during fertility treatments and in those with previous spontaneous pregnancies; (iii) no miscarriages after PGS in couples in whom a fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay showed the male partner's sperm to be abnormal; and (iv) lower implantation rates in couples with > or =5 previous miscarriages, associated with a lower percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos. It is concluded that PGS is to be strongly recommended when RPL is associated with miscarriages during infertility treatments, chromosomopathy in a previous miscarriage, up to five previous miscarriages and a high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in spermatozoa.