Firearm injury prevention counseling for patients with traumatic brain injury: a survey of brain injury physicians.

Background: Survivors of traumatic brain injury are at increased risk for firearm-related injuries, including suicide. Aims: To determine current practices of Brain Injury Medicine (BIM) physicians and their rehabilitation teams in assessing patients' access to firearms and in providing firearm safety education, and the impact of having received training on this topic on physicians' likelihood of inquiring about patients' access to firearms. Methods: 14-item web-based cross-sectional survey of 86 U.S. physiatrists board-certified in BIM. Results: 81% of respondents indicated they believe BIM physicians should counsel their patients on firearm safety but only 12.9% reported always doing so. Fifteen percent reported always inquiring about their patients' access to firearms. 88.2% indicated having never received formal training on firearm injury prevention counseling. Physicians who received such training had 7.5 times higher odds of reporting at least sometimes inquiring about patients' access to firearms than those who were not trained [95% confidence interval (1.94, 28.64)]. They also had 5.7 times higher odds for reporting being at least moderately comfortable providing patients firearm safety counseling [95% CI: (1.39, 23.22)]. Conclusion: While most BIM specialists who responded to this survey believe they should counsel patients on firearm safety, few always or usually do so. Moreover, most do not routinely inquire about their patients' access to firearms. The provision of firearm injury prevention training to BIM physicians was strongly associated with an increased likelihood they will inquire about their patients' access to guns and with an improved comfort level in providing counseling on this subject matter.

The Effectiveness of Intraarticular Cervical Facet Steroid Injections in the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervicogenic headache (CGH) can often be difficult to treat, given the overlapping clinical features of other headaches and the varying sources of pain that patients report. While imaging is not useful in diagnosing CGH, anesthetic blockade of the atlanto-occipital joint, lateral atlantoaxial joint, or specific cervical zygapophyseal joints can be used to confirm the diagnosis. When conservative treatment measures, such as physical therapy, fail, interventional techniques, such as intraarticular steroid injections, have been shown in observational studies to provide relief in some patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of intraarticular cervical facet steroid injections in the treatment of CGH. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus with Full Text, Scopus, and the Web of Science platform, from inception to April 2021, for studies using intraarticular cervical facet injections to treat CGH in adults aged 18 or older. Primary outcomes included mean postinjection pain scores. Outcomes were pooled using a random effects model and reported as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 64 patients met the inclusion criteria. According to data from each of the included studies, intraarticular cervical facet injections were shown to demonstrate improvement in the mean pain score from baseline to postintervention. The overall effect size-pooled MD in the Visual Analog Scale score-was 3.299 (95% CI: 2.045 to 4.552, P < 0.001). Heterogeneity (I2) was 36.11%. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, lack of control group, and varying pain generators and interventional technique between studies contribute to the limitations of the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that therapeutic intraarticular cervical facet injections may be effective in the treatment of CGH. Because of the heterogeneity among the studies, these results should be interpreted with caution.

Access limitations and level of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in a geographically-limited sample of individuals with spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: Assess changes in access and psychological status during the COVID-19 pandemic in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort telephone survey study. SETTING: South Florida SCI Model System (SF-SCIMS). PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 51 individuals with traumatic SCI who had previously completed SCIMS Form II follow-up interviews. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Questionnaire administration included assessments of resilience, depressive symptoms, satisfaction with life, anxiety, pain, alcohol and substance use, COVID-19 diagnoses and symptoms, and impact of early COVID-19 community restrictions on various aspects of life. RESULTS: Of the individuals interviewed, 78% reported limited access to their regular activities, 40% to healthcare information and services, 38% to personal protective equipment (PPE), 37% to food/groceries, and 34% to medication refills. Sixteen percent of the participants had at least moderate levels of depression, and 10% had at least moderate levels of anxiety. Statistically significant increases in depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 9; P = 0.004) and significant decreases in resilience (SCI-Quality of Life Resilience subscore; P = 0.010) were found when comparing scores on measures of psychological function at the time of the study to scores collected during the previous SCIMS Form II interview (within 2 years pre-COVID-19). CONCLUSION(S): Limitations to basic needs and face-to-face communication can exacerbate challenges in access for persons with disabilities. Our results show increased levels of psychological distress related to decreased access to goods and services in individuals with SCI due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study can help the SCI community to target strategies for enhanced access, outreach, shared information, and social support in preparation for future community health or weather emergencies.