Rheumatological therapy in Prehispanic Mesoamerica.

Nahuatl medicine was remarkably advanced in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Thoughts on health and disease were different to those prevalent in Europe in the sixteenth century because they included magic, religion and different kinds of animal, mineral and, notably, herbal medicine. These resources were used in a supplementary, not isolated, way by Nahua physicians (ticitl) according to patients' needs and beliefs. Most Nahua physicians had similar knowledge but there were some differences between rural and urban areas, and those who were also doctor-priests of a particular deity. After the European colonization of Mesoamerica, great efforts were made by Spaniards and Indians to recover the immense amount of ancient knowledge in Mesoamerica related to medicine. Some of this work, not all, is included in the Cruz-Badiano Codex, the Florentine Codex or Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España, and the Francisco Hernández Codex. A review of these codices and the recent literature on the practice of Nahua Medicine was performed with particular interest in herbal medicine in rheumatic diseases, or symptoms probably related to rheumatic diseases, during the sixteenth century in the land currently known as Mexico.

Terapéutica reumatológica en la mesoamérica prehispánica / Rheumatological Therapy in Prehispanic Mesoamerica

La medicina náhuatl tenía un notable desarrollo en la Mesoamérica prehispánica. El concepto de salud y enfermedad era diferente al que en el siglo XVI prevalecía en Europa e incluía conceptos de magia, religión, empleo de recursos físicos, de animales, de minerales y, muy destacadamente, de la herbolaria. El médico nahua (ticitl) no utilizaba estos recursos en forma aislada sino de manera complementaria de acuerdo con las características de cada paciente. Los médicos compartían conocimientos generales comunes, pero había diferencias entre los que vivían en las zonas rurales, los de la ciudad y los médicos-sacerdotes. En los años que siguieron a las guerras de conquista se hicieron esfuerzos para recopilar las características de la medicina en Mesoamérica. Algunos de estos trabajos, no los únicos, son el Códice De la Cruz-Badiano, el Códice Florentino o Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España y el Códice Francisco Hernández. Se llevó a cabo una revisión de estos códices y de la literatura reciente referente a la práctica médica náhuatl con énfasis en la herbolaria como recurso terapéutico para los padecimientos reumatológicos en el siglo XVI, en los territorios que ahora conocemos como México.(AU)

Nahuatl medicine was remarkably advanced in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Thoughts on health and disease were different to those prevalent in Europe in the sixteenth century because they included magic, religion and different kinds of animal, mineral and, notably, herbal medicine. These resources were used in a supplementary, not isolated, way by Nahua physicians (ticitl) according to patients’ needs and beliefs. Most Nahua physicians had similar knowledge but there were some differences between rural and urban areas, and those who were also doctor-priests of a particular deity. After the European colonization of Mesoamerica, great efforts were made by Spaniards and Indians to recover the immense amount of ancient knowledge in Mesoamerica related to medicine. Some of this work, not all, is included in the Cruz-Badiano Codex, the Florentine Codex or Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España, and the Francisco Hernández Codex. A review of these codices and the recent literature on the practice of Nahua Medicine was performed with particular interest in herbal medicine in rheumatic diseases, or symptoms probably related to rheumatic diseases, during the sixteenth century in the land currently known as Mexico.(AU)

Rheumatological Therapy in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. / Terapéutica reumatológica en la mesoamérica prehispánica.

Nahuatl medicine was remarkably advanced in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Thoughts on health and disease were different to those prevalent in Europe in the sixteenth century because they included magic, religion and different kinds of animal, mineral and, notably, herbal medicine. These resources were used in a supplementary, not isolated, way by Nahua physicians (ticitl) according to patients' needs and beliefs. Most Nahua physicians had similar knowledge but there were some differences between rural and urban areas, and those who were also doctor-priests of a particular deity. After the European colonization of Mesoamerica, great efforts were made by Spaniards and Indians to recover the immense amount of ancient knowledge in Mesoamerica related to medicine. Some of this work, not all, is included in the Cruz-Badiano Codex, the Florentine Codex or Historia general de las cosas de la Nueva España, and the Francisco Hernández Codex. A review of these codices and the recent literature on the practice of Nahua Medicine was performed with particular interest in herbal medicine in rheumatic diseases, or symptoms probably related to rheumatic diseases, during the sixteenth century in the land currently known as Mexico.

Switching to Biosimilar SDZ-ADL in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: 48-Week Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Results From the Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind ADMYRA Study.

BACKGROUND: Sandoz adalimumab SDZ-ADL (GP-2017) is an approved adalimumab biosimilar with similar efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity to reference adalimumab (ref-ADL) as confirmed by analytical, pharmacokinetic and confirmatory studies. ADMYRA, a phase III double-blind study, was conducted with an aim to generate efficacy, safety and immunogenicity comparability data in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) having inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including methotrexate (MTX). The study also evaluated an aspect of 'switching' reference product to the biosimilar in terms of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity up to Week 48. METHODS: Eligible patients (N = 353) were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous (sc) SDZ-ADL 40 mg (n = 177) or ref-ADL (n = 176) every other week from Week 0 to Week 24. At Week 24, all patients with at least a moderate response by Disease Activity Score-28 including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in the SDZ-ADL group continued SDZ-ADL (n = 159), and in the ref-ADL group were switched to SDZ-ADL (n = 166), treated for up to 46 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in DAS28-CRP from baseline at Week 12. Other efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, EULAR remission, Boolean remission, safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: The DAS28-CRP score changes from baseline at Week 12 were similar between SDZ-ADL (- 2.16) and ref-ADL (- 2.18) with a mean difference (95% CI) of 0.02 (- 0.24 to 0.27), which was within the pre-specified equivalence margin of ± 0.6. After switching treatment from ref-ADL to SDZ-ADL, the mean DAS28-CRP change was similar between the SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' group (- 3.09 vs - 3.05). The proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR response was 69.2%/29.0% in the SDZ-ADL group and 68.0%/29.6% in the 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' group. The proportion of patients in EULAR remission was 51.4% and 54.4% and in Boolean remission was 16.8% and 21.6% for SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups, respectively. The secondary endpoints were similar across the treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and injection-site reactions were low and similar between SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups (AEs 70.6% vs 68.8%, injection-site reactions 4.0% vs 6.3%), and most of these patients experienced AEs of mild or moderate severity. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 24.2% and 25.6% of patients treated with SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL', respectively, from baseline to Week 48, of which 72.5% in SDZ-ADL and 79.1% in 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups were neutralizing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs, SDZ-ADL demonstrated a similar efficacy and a comparable safety and immunogenicity profile to ref-ADL. Efficacy was sustained after switching from ref-ADL to SDZ-ADL with no impact on safety (NCT02744755).

Desempeño del examen clínico objetivo estructurado como instrumento de evaluación en la certificación nacional como reumatólogo / Performance of an objective structured clinical examination in a national certification process of trainees in rheumatology

Objetivo. Determinar la validez de constructo y la confiabilidad de un examen clínico objetivo estructurado (ECOE) en la evaluación de una certificación nacional como reumatólogo. Método. En 2013 y 2014, se aplicaron sendos ECOE y evaluación teórica (ET) a 32 y 38 residentes aspirantes a la certificación de reumatólogo, respectivamente. Se incluyeron 12 y 15 estaciones calificadas mediante lista de cotejo validada. Previamente, 3 reumatólogos certificados realizaron sendas pruebas piloto. Se calculó la puntuación global del ECOE y se evaluó su desempeño. Resultados. En 2013, la media ± DE del ECOE fue de 7,1 ± 0,6) y ningún aspirante tuvo calificación reprobatoria (CR); la media de la ET fue de 6,5 ± 0,6 y 7 aspirantes (21,9%) tuvieron CR (< 6). En 2014, la media del ECOE fue de 6,7 ± 0,6) y 3 aspirantes (7,9%) tuvieron CR, de los cuales 2 reprobaron la ET; la media de la ET fue de 6,4 ± 0,5) y 7 aspirantes (18,5%) tuvieron CR, 2 de los cuales reprobaron el ECOE. En 2013, la correlación entre el ECOE y la ET fue de r = 0,44, p = 0,006. En ambos años, los reumatólogos certificados obtuvieron mejores calificaciones en el ECOE que los residentes. El porcentaje de aprobados en la ET fue mayor entre quienes aprobaron el ECOE que entre quienes lo reprobaron: 86% vs. 67%, p = 0,02. Se aplicaron 9 estaciones en ambos años y sus puntuaciones mostraron correlación de 0,81 a 0,95, p ≤ 0,01. Conclusión. El ECOE es una herramienta adecuada para evaluar las competencias clínicas de los aspirantes a la certificación (AU)

Objective. To assess reliability and validity of the objectively-structured clinical examination (OSCE) applied in postgraduate certification processes by the Mexican Board of Rheumatology. Method. Thirty-two (2013) and 38 (2014) Rheumatology trainees (RTs) underwent an OSCE consisting of 12 and 15 stations respectively, scored according to a validated check-list, as well as 300-multiple-choice 300 question examination (MCQ). Previously, 3 certified rheumatologists underwent a pilot-OSCE. A composite OSCE score was obtained for each participant and its performance examined. Results. In 2013, OSCE mean score was 7.1 ± 0.6 with none RT receiving a failing score while the MCQ score was 6.5 ± 0.6 and 7 (21.9%) RTs receiving a failing (< 6) score. In 2014, the OSCE score was 6.7 ± 0.6, with 3 (7.9%) RTs receiving a failing score (2 of them also failed MCQ) while the MCQ score was 6.4 ± 0.5 and 7 (18.5%) RTs were disqualified (2 of them also failed OSCE). A significant correlation between the MCQ and the OSCE scores was observed in the 2013 (r=0.44; P=0.006). Certified rheumatologists performed better than RTs at both OSCE. Overall, 86% of RTs obtaining an OSCE passing score also obtained a MCQ passing score, while this was only 67% (P=.02) among those who obtained an OSCE failing score. Nine stations were applied at both consecutive years. Their performance was similar in both certification processes, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.95 (P≤0.01). Conclusion. The OSCE is a valid and reliable tool to assess the Rheumatology clinical skills in RTs (AU)

Performance of an objective structured clinical examination in a national certification process of trainees in rheumatology.

OBJECTIVE: To assess reliability and validity of the objectively-structured clinical examination (OSCE) applied in postgraduate certification processes by the Mexican Board of Rheumatology. METHOD: Thirty-two (2013) and 38 (2014) Rheumatology trainees (RTs) underwent an OSCE consisting of 12 and 15 stations respectively, scored according to a validated check-list, as well as 300-multiple-choice 300 question examination (MCQ). Previously, 3 certified rheumatologists underwent a pilot-OSCE. A composite OSCE score was obtained for each participant and its performance examined. RESULTS: In 2013, OSCE mean score was 7.1±0.6 with none RT receiving a failing score while the MCQ score was 6.5±0.6 and 7 (21.9%) RTs receiving a failing (< 6) score. In 2014, the OSCE score was 6.7±0.6, with 3 (7.9%) RTs receiving a failing score (2 of them also failed MCQ) while the MCQ score was 6.4±0.5 and 7 (18.5%) RTs were disqualified (2 of them also failed OSCE). A significant correlation between the MCQ and the OSCE scores was observed in the 2013 (r=0.44; P=0.006). Certified rheumatologists performed better than RTs at both OSCE. Overall, 86% of RTs obtaining an OSCE passing score also obtained a MCQ passing score, while this was only 67% (P=.02) among those who obtained an OSCE failing score. Nine stations were applied at both consecutive years. Their performance was similar in both certification processes, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.95 (P≤0.01). CONCLUSION: The OSCE is a valid and reliable tool to assess the Rheumatology clinical skills in RTs.

[Cardiovascular risk of cyclooxygenase selective inhibitors]. / Riesgo cardiovascular derivado de los inhibidores selectivos de la ciclooxigenasa.

It has been estimated that 30 million people worldwide take an nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) daily. The main clinical objectives of these drugs are both to reduce joint pain and to improve joint function. However, gastrointestinal adverse events lead to the development of cyclooxygenase selective inhibitors (COXIB) with a better gastrointestinal safety profile. Since 1999, COXIB shown capacity to develop cardiovascular adverse events. Subsequent discoveries confirm overall risk of cardiovascular events. The increased cardiovascular risk occurred both in patients who were taking aspirin and in those who were not. Similar results with different COXIB appears to be a class effect of the COX-2 inhibitors, so patient risk factors must be identified and used in treatment decision making. Patients with gastrointestinal risk factors and no cardiovascular risk may benefit from use of a gastroprotective agent plus a nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs as a COXIB. We review assays whose objective was to study cardiovascular security of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and COXIB for known advantages and limitations of these drugs.

Estudio clínico controlado de ciclosporina A y cloroquina en artritis reumatoide de inicio temprano. Reporte preliminar y revisión de la literatura / Controlled clinical trial with cyclosporine and chloroquine in early rheumatoid arthritis

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de ciclosporina A (CsA) + cloroquina (CLQ) o placebo en pacientes con AR de inicio temprano y comparar los resultados con una revisión de la literatura de la combinación de CsA con otras drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad (DMARD).Métodos: Reporte preliminar de un estudio doble ciego controlado, de 90 pacientes con AR de inicio temprano, comparando CsA + CLQ o placebo. Variable de desenlace ACR 20, 50 y 70. Revisión de la literatura de 10 estudios completos de terapia combinada que incluyeron a la CsA.Resultados: A los 6 meses de tratamiento, cumplieron los criterios de mejoría (ACR-20) 34 pacientes (83 por ciento) del grupo CsA + CLQ y 25 (61 por ciento) del grupo CsA + placebo (p=0.02). A los 12 meses, no hubo diferencia significativa en la mejoría con los criterios de ACR-20. La diferencia fue significativa con ACR-50 (54 por ciento vs 34 por ciento, p= 0.05) y con ACR-70 (51 por ciento vs 26 por ciento, p=0.05). No hubo diferencias significativas en los efectos adversos en ambos grupos. La revisión de la literatura mostró reportes de CsA en combinación con MTX, oro parenteral, HCQ, CLQ y SSZ. La combinación más estudiada y al parecer más eficaz fue CsA con MTX. Conclusión: La combinación de CsA + CLQ parece ser eficaz en pacientes con AR temprana. Aunque la literatura sugiere que la mejor combinación con CsA es MTX, la CLQ parece ser una opción útil en terapia combinada con CsA.

Manifestaciones otorrinolaringológicas de las enfermedades de la colágena / Otorhinolaryngological manifestations of connective tissue diseases

Los pacientes con enfermedades del tejido conectivo pueden presentar alteraciones en estructuras de cabeza y cuello, que en nuestro medio han sido poco estudiadas, En el Centro Médico Nacional La Raza del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, se efectuó un estudio transversal descriptivo para identificar la frecuencia de las manifestaciones otorrinolaringológicas en pacientes adultos con las enfermedades de la colágena más comunes. Se seleccionaron 51 pacientes de 18 a 50 años de edad, con 1.5 a 18 años de evolución, sin antecedentes de enfermedades otorrinolaringológicas: 20 con artritis reumatoide, 21 con lupus eritematoso sistémico y 10 con síndrome de Sjögren primario. En los pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico predominó la afección de mucosas nasal y oral, que incluyó la perforación septal y la estenosis subglótica; en aquellos con artritis reumatoide, el compromiso subclínico de la articulación temporomandibular y de la movilidad del complejo tímpano-osicular; y en los portadores de síndrome de Sjögren primario, afección de las glándulas salivales y fisfunción ototubaria. La identificación de alteraciones de curso subclínico con repercusión funcional señala la importancia de efectuar una exploración otorrinolaringólogica temprana a estos pacientes para evitar posibles secuelas

Impacto del virus de inmunodeficiencia humana sobre manifestaciones reumatológicas en poblaciones de alto riesgo

Las manifestaciones reumáticas de han reportado hasta en el 71 por ciento de los pacientes con infección por VIH, frecuentemente en estadios avanzados. Objetivo. Determinar el impacto en la frecuencia de manifestaciones reumáticas en pacientes con infección por VIH, comparados con controles de poblaciones similares VIH -. Pacientes y métodos. Se estudiaron en forma prospectiva, descriptiva y observacional 128 pacientes VIH+, 103 hombres y 25 mujeres, con edad promedio de 31.5 años (grupo I), comparándose con 130 pacientes con factores de riesgo semejantes, pero con serología negativa para VIH (Grupo II). Resultados. En el grupo I se identificaron alteraciones en 85/128 (66 por ciento); 52 tuvieron artralgias, 42 mialgias, entesitis y bursitis en 29, artritis asimétrica en 9 casos; y con hipersensibilidad, incapacitante y autolimitada en 7 pacientes. En este mismo grupo se encontró síndrome de Reiter en 10 casos (7 por ciento), fibromialgia en 10 (5 por ciento), complejo sicca, osteonecrosis, dermatopolimiositis, artritis séptica y podagra. En el grupo II, 6/130 pacientes (4 por ciento), tuvieron alteraciones menores (fibromialgia y artralgias) (p < 0.0001). Laboratorio. La eritrosedimentación acelerada (Grupo I) en 87/128 (67 por ciento), factor reumatoide 24/128 (18 por ciento), TTP prolongado 39/128 (30 por ciento), VDRL+ falso en 11/128 (8 por ciento), anticuerpos antinucleares en 16/128 (12 por ciento), anticuerpos anticardiolipina IgC 116/128 (86 por ciento), IgM 52/128 (40 por ciento). Se encontró hiperuricemia en 48/128 (37 por ciento) del grupo I y en 2 del grupo II (p < 0.0001), mientras que hipouricemia sólo en 6 pacientes VIH+. Once de dieciséis pacientes con sarcoma de Kaposi y enfermedades linfoproliferativas tuvieron alteraciones en los niveles de urato. Conclusiones. Las manifestaciones reumatológicas son frecuentes en pacientes VIH+, y su presencia puede indicar infección temprana en poblaciones de riesgo. En etapas tardías, la presencia de hiperuricemia puede ser utilizada como marcador y/o predictor de neoplasia