Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(2): 133-142, 2023 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36661419

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We present a systematic review on the effectiveness of noninvasive respiratory support techniques in bronchiolitis. DATA SOURCES: Systematic review with pairwise meta-analyses of all studies and network meta-analyses of the clinical trials. STUDY SELECTION: Patients below 24 months old with bronchiolitis who require noninvasive respiratory support were included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT, and cohort studies in which high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was compared with conventional low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) and/or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). DATA EXTRACTION: Emergency wards and hospitalized patients with bronchiolitis. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 3,367 patients were analyzed in 14 RCTs and 8,385 patients in 14 non-RCTs studies. Only in nonexperimental studies, HFNC is associated with a lower risk of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) than NIV (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.42-0.58), with no differences in experimental studies. There were no differences between HFNC and NIV in other outcomes. HFNC is more effective than LFOT in reducing oxygen days and treatment failure. In the network meta-analyses of clinical trials, NIV was the most effective intervention to avoid invasive MV (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 57.03%) and to reduce days under oxygen therapy (SUCRA, 79.42%), although crossover effect estimates between interventions showed no significant differences. The included studies show methodological heterogeneity, but it is only statistically significant for the reduction of days of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental evidence does not suggest that high-flow oxygen therapy has advantages over LFOT as initial treatment nor over NIV as a rescue treatment.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Ventilación no Invasiva , Humanos , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Cánula , Metaanálisis en Red , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Oxígeno , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Lactante
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2017: 2565397, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28421191

RESUMEN

Objective. To determine the epidemiology and therapeutic management of patients with severe acute bronchiolitis (AB) admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Spain. Design. Descriptive, prospective, multicentre study. Setting. Sixteen Spanish PICUs. Patients. Patients with severe AB who required admission to any of the participating PICUs over 1 year. Interventions. Both epidemiological variables and medical treatment received were recorded. Results. A total of 262 patients were recruited; 143 were male (54.6%), with median age of 1 month (0-23). Median stay in the PICU was 7 days (1-46). Sixty patients (23%) received no nebuliser treatment, while the rest received a combination of inhalation therapies. One-quarter of patients (24.8%) received corticosteroids and 56.5% antibiotic therapy. High-flow oxygen therapy was used in 14.3% and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) was used in 75.6%. Endotracheal intubation was required in 24.4% of patients. Younger age, antibiotic therapy, and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) were risk factors that significantly increased the stay in the PICU. Conclusions. Spanish PICUs continue to routinely use nebulised bronchodilator treatment and corticosteroid therapy. Despite NIV being widely used in this condition, intubation was required in one-quarter of cases. Younger age, antibiotic therapy, and IMV were associated with a longer stay in the PICU.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , España
3.
Neuropediatrics ; 48(1): 45-48, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27434885

RESUMEN

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a rare condition which evolves into refractory status epilepticus (SE), with poor outcome in most cases. Conventional antiepileptic drugs fail to control SE in FIRES patients. We report the case of a previously healthy 4-year-old boy who was diagnosed with FIRES. One week after pharyngitis and high fever he started seizures, followed by refractory SE. Benzodiazepines, phenytoin, high-dose barbiturates that induce burst suppression, high doses of corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, immunoglobulins, propofol, lidocaine, ketamine, inhaled desflurane, ketogenic diet, lacosamide, and therapeutic hypothermia were tried at different times in a period of 8 weeks, but all of them were ineffective. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been used in refractory SE in children. We report a case in which ECT was successfully used for treatment of refractory SE in a pediatric patient with FIRES syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatía Aguda Febril/complicaciones , Terapia Electroconvulsiva/métodos , Estado Epiléptico/etiología , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Masculino , Estado Epiléptico/líquido cefalorraquídeo
4.
Pediatr. aten. prim ; 18(70): e63-e72, abr.-jun. 2016. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-153811

RESUMEN

Introducción y objetivo: se diseñó una encuesta nacional para analizar el grado de conocimientos teóricos y la actitud de los pediatras ante la laringomalacia por la percepción de que algunos casos graves son infravalorados. Material y método: estudio transversal, descriptivo y analítico, de ámbito nacional, mediante encuesta online. Incluyó pediatras del área hospitalaria y Atención Primaria, diseñándose un cuestionario de 16 preguntas. Las variables recogidas fueron filiación, conocimientos generales, diagnóstico y manejo de la laringomalacia. Resultados: se contestaron 233 encuestas. La actitud mayoritaria ante un caso de laringomalacia era expectante (54,1%), no existiendo diferencias en función de la experiencia de los pediatras, ni por años trabajados ni por número de casos de laringomalacia atendidos. El grado de conocimientos generales de los encuestados fue superior al 89%, disminuyendo al 57% en conocimientos referidos a las laringomalacias graves. El 67% conocía las pruebas complementarias a aplicar en los casos graves y el 73,3% las posibles comorbilidades. El 85,6% coinciden que la ventilación no invasiva puede ser útil en pacientes con laringomalacia grave. Conclusiones: la encuesta muestra que la laringomalacia es una patología conocida, aunque existe disparidad en la actitud inicial a seguir y en las herramientas que utilizan los pediatras para basar su manejo. A pesar de que el grado de conocimiento general conceptual y diagnóstico es adecuado, este disminuye en conceptos más específicos que engloban a los casos de laringomalacia grave. Sería deseable la elaboración de guías clínicas y protocolos para estandarizar el manejo de la laringomalacia (AU)


Background and aims: a national survey was designed to analyze the knowledge and approach of pediatricians to laryngomalacia, due to the perception that some severe cases were overlooked. Materials and methods: this is a national, transversal, descriptive and analytical study, conducted through an on-line survey. We designed a 16 item questionnaire, and targeted both primary care and specialty pediatricians. The variables included professional data filiation, general knowledge, diagnosis and management of laryngomalacia. Results: 233 surveys were answered. The most common approach in a case of suspected laryngomalacia was expectant (54.1%), no differences were found in terms of pediatricians experience, neither by years of time worked, nor by the number of laryngomalacia cases previously assisted. Level of general knowledge shown by participants was higher than 89%, while it decreased to 57% when analyzing items covering severe laryngomalacia. 67% were aware of the additional tests to perform in severe cases, and 73.3% were alert for possible comorbidities. 85.6% agreed that non-invasive ventilation is useful in patients with severe laryngomalacia. Conclusions: the survey shows that laryngomalacia is a well-known condition, although there is not a clear consensus in the initial approach nor in the tools used by pediatricians to base its management. Though the knowledge in general concepts and diagnostics is suitable, it decreases in more specific concepts related to cases of severe laryngomalacia. It would be desirable that clinical guidelines and protocols were developed, to standardize management of laryngomalacia (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Laringomalacia/epidemiología , Laringomalacia/prevención & control , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Sueño/fisiología , Estudios Transversales/instrumentación , Estudios Transversales/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pediatría , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...