Association of psychosocial risk factors and liver transplant evaluation outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a standardized psychosocial assessment tool used in liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and has been primarily studied in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between SIPAT score and metabolic syndrome severity and LT waitlist outcomes in a large cohort of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT from 2014 to 2021. The utility of the previously defined total SIPAT cutoff (<21 [excellent/good candidates] vs. ≥21 [minimally acceptable/high-risk candidates]) was studied. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined associations between continuous SIPAT scores and LT waitlisting outcomes. The Youden J statistic was used to identify the optimal SIPAT cutoff for patients with MASLD. A total of 480 patients evaluated for transplant with MASLD were included. Only 9.4% of patients had a SIPAT score ≥21. Patients with SIPAT score ≥21 had higher hemoglobin A1c compared to patients with lower psychosocial risk (median [IQR]: 7.8 [6.0-9.7] vs. 6.6 [5.8-7.9]; p = 0.04). There were no other differences in metabolic comorbidities between SIPAT groups. Increasing SIPAT score was associated with decreased odds of listing (OR: 0.82 per 5-point increase; p = 0.003) in multivariable models. A SIPAT of ≥12 was identified as the optimal cutoff in this population, resulting in an adjusted OR for a listing of 0.53 versus SIPAT <12 ( p = 0.001). In this large cohort of patients with MASLD evaluated for LT, few patients met the previously defined high SIPAT cutoff for transplant suitability. Nevertheless, increasing the SIPAT score was associated with waitlist outcomes. Our suggested SIPAT cutoff of ≥12 for patients with MASLD warrants further external validation using data from other centers.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation versus Standard of Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIV) is a common and necessary procedure in the emergency department (ED). Patients with PIV access encounter significant treatment delay. Ultrasound guidance for PIV (USGPIV) cannulation is a modality to reduce delay of care in such patients, but its efficacy, when compared with cannulation by the standard of care (SOC), the landmark and palpation method, has not been well established. We performed a random effects meta-analysis of available literature that compared USGPIV with SOC cannulation. We searched PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE until October 2020 for eligible studies in adult patients. We excluded non-English language, non-full-text studies. Our primary outcome was rate of first successful cannulation. Other outcomes were number of attempts and patient satisfaction. After identifying 284 studies and screening 74 studies, we included 10 studies. There were 1860 patients, 966 (52%) in the USGPIV group and 894 (48%) who received the SOC. Sixty-six percent of patients were female. USGPIV cannulation was associated with a two-times higher likelihood of first successful cannulation (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-2.7, p < 0.001, I2 = 2.9%). While procedure length was similar in both groups, USGPIV was associated with a significantly smaller number of attempts (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.272, 95% CI: -0.539 to -0.004, p = 0.047) and significantly higher patient satisfaction (SMD: 1.467, 95% CI: 0.92-2.012, p < 0.001). There was low heterogeneity among our included studies, which were mostly randomized control trials. Our study confirmed that USGPIV cannulation offers a more effective modality, compared with SOC, to improve quality of care for patients with difficult PIV access.

A profile on cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 as companion diagnostic for first-line treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, there is one molecularly defined subgroup harboring activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR), which results in constitutive activation of its intrinsic kinase activity. Consistent data have demonstrated that these patients have a better outcome when treated with specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Therefore, analysis of EGFR mutational status for treatment guidance is mandatory in this context. AREAS COVERED: Herein we review the clinical development and technical features of cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 as a companion diagnostic test (CDx) for therapy with EGFR-TKIs, such as gefitinib, in advanced NSCLC. We also discuss the pros and cons of the current version of the CDx and its performance in both tissue and plasma samples. EXPERT OPINION: The RT-PCR based cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 is a reliable and rapid solution for EGFR mutational status assessment at the time of diagnosis in advanced NSCLC that allows eligibility of patients for EGFR-TKI treatment. This test determines EGFR mutations with acceptable sensitivity in tissue or plasma samples. Pre-analytical considerations like tumor cell content, tumor burden or location of metastasis should be considered to better interpret results in the clinical contexture.

Problematic Internet Use and Associated High-Risk Behavior in an Adolescent Clinical Sample: Results from a Survey of Psychiatrically Hospitalized Youth.

Problematic Internet use (PIU) is a growing clinical concern to clinicians working in adolescent mental health, with significant potential comorbidities like depression and substance use. No prior study has examined associations between PIU, high-risk behavior, and psychiatric diagnoses specifically in psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Here, we analyzed how PIU severity correlated with preadmission Internet habits, psychiatric symptoms, and high-risk behavior in this unique population. We hypothesized that as the severity of PIU increased, so would endorsement of mood symptoms, engagement in risky behaviors, and chances of having comorbid mood and aggression-related diagnoses. We performed a cross-sectional survey on an adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit in an urban community hospital in Massachusetts. Participants were 12-20 years old (n = 205), 62.0 percent female, and of diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. Relationships between PIU, high-risk symptoms, diagnoses, and behaviors were performed both using chi-square tests and determining Pearson correlation coefficients. Two hundred five adolescents participated in the study. PIU severity was associated with being female (p < 0.005), sexting (p < 0.05), cyberbullying (p < 0.005), and increased suicidality within the last year (p < 0.05). Adolescents with aggressive and developmental disorders, but not depressive disorders, also had significantly higher PIU scores (p ≤ 0.05). In our sample of psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents, PIU severity was significantly associated with both serious psychiatric symptoms and high-risk behaviors, including those related to suicide. Our findings may improve safety assessments in this vulnerable adolescent population by identifying comorbid risks associated with problematic digital media use.