Working length variation during multiple-visit endodontic treatment: An observational study.

This study investigated variation in working length during multiple-visit endodontic treatment. Patients (N = 106) with pulpitis or pulp necrosis, with or without apical periodontitis, were included. During the first appointment, glide path was performed with ProGlider and shaping with ProTaper Next. Working length was detected four times. Working length was then re-recorded prior to filling during the second appointment and a 0.5 mm threshold was selected as the minimum clinically meaningful variation. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the impact of tooth anatomy, preoperative pulp status, apical periodontitis and lesions of endodontic origin on working length variation. Working length varied between first and second appointments in 34% of patients. The presence of apical periodontitis was the only variable significantly associated with variation in working length (p = 0.011). These data suggest that working length should be re-checked prior to root canal filling to prevent procedural errors.

Reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis infrabony defects of various configurations: 5-year survival and success.

AIM: To present the 5 years outcomes of a reconstructive surgical protocol for peri-implantitis defects with different morphologies, by means of deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen (DBBMC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The original population of this case series consisted of 75 patients with one crater-like defect and probing depth (PD) ≥6 mm. After flap elevation, defects were assigned to one characteristic class and treated by means of DBBMC. Following healing, patients were enrolled in an individualized supportive periodontal/peri-implant (SPT) program. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients reached the 5 years examination, as 11 patients were lost to follow-up and 13 implants were removed. Overall treatment success was registered in 29 patients (45.3%). Mean PD and BOP significantly decreased at one year and remained stable for the rest of observation period. No correlation was found between implant survival rate and defect configuration (p = 0.213). Patients, who did not fully adhere to the SPT, experienced more complications and implant loss than those who regularly attended recall appointments (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed reconstructive treatment resulted in a high 5 years implant survival rate in patients who fully adhered to SPT. The resolution of the peri-implantitis defect does not seem significantly associated with the defect configuration at the time of treatment.