RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The huge burden of inaccurate penicillin allergy labels (PALs) is an important driver of antimicrobial resistance. This is magnified by insufficient allergy specialists and lack of 'point-of-care' tests. We investigated the feasibility of non-allergy healthcare professionals (HCPs) delivering direct oral penicillin challenges (DPCs) for penicillin allergy de-labelling. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals in England across three settings (acute medical, pre-surgical and haematology-oncology). Patients with a PAL were screened and stratified as low risk/high risk. Low risk patients (non-immune mediated symptoms, benign rash, tolerated amoxicillin since and family history) underwent a DPC. RESULTS: N = 2257 PALs were screened, 1054 were eligible; 643 were approached, 373 declined, 270 consented and 259 risk stratified (low risk = 155; high risk = 104). One hundred and twenty-six low risk patients underwent DPC, 122 (96.8%) were de-labelled with no serious allergic reactions. Conversion rate from screening-to-consent was 12% [3.3% and 17.9% in acute and elective settings respectively; odds ratios for consent were 3.42 (p < 0.001) and 5.53 (p < 0.001) in haematology-oncology and pre-surgical setting respectively. Common reasons for failure to progress in the study included difficulty in reaching patients, clinical instability/medical reasons, lacking capacity to consent and psychological factors. INTERPRETATION: DPCs can be delivered by non-allergy HCPs. A high proportion of patients with PALs did not progress in the study pathway. Strategies to deliver DPC at optimal points of the care pathway are needed to enhance uptake. Elective settings offer greater opportunities than acute settings for DPC. The safety and simplicity of DPCs lends itself to adoption by healthcare systems beyond the UK, including in resource-limited settings.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Atención a la SaludRESUMEN
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is a disabling but treatable disorder. However, misdiagnosis is common, and it can be difficult to optimise its treatment. Various agents are used both for first and second line. First-line options are intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids and plasma exchange. Second-line therapies may be introduced as steroid-sparing agents or as more potent escalation therapy. It is also important to consider symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain and non-pharmacological interventions. We discuss the evidence for the various treatments and explain the practicalities of the different approaches. We also outline strategies for monitoring response and assessing the ongoing need for therapy.
Asunto(s)
Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Intercambio Plasmático , Errores DiagnósticosAsunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática , Trombocitopenia , Trombosis , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/inducido químicamente , Púrpura Trombocitopénica Idiopática/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombosis/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old woman was referred for immunological investigation following an episode of meningococcal epiglottitis with associated septicaemia. Several years previously, she had been diagnosed with undifferentiated connective tissue disease. On investigation, alternative pathway complement function was normal; however, classical pathway complement activation was reduced. C1q, C3 and C4 levels were all measured and found to be within their respective normal ranges, but C2 levels were low. Sequencing of the C2 gene was subsequently performed, confirming a diagnosis of type 1 C2 deficiency (C2D). DISCUSSION: C2D is usually hereditary and inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. C2D is often asymptomatic, however, some patients suffer from infections with encapsulated bacteria and/or autoimmune diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus. Recognition of complement pathway deficiency is important due to the predisposition to severe and/or recurrent infections by encapsulated bacteria. Immunisations have the potential to reduce both mortality and morbidity not only for the patient but also for any affected relatives.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo , Epiglotitis , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Anciano , Complemento C2 , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento , Epiglotitis/diagnóstico , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
Objectives: Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor antagonist, is used in the treatment of severe COVID-19 caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, unintended consequences of TCZ therapy include reactivation of tuberculosis (TB) or hepatitis B virus (HBV), and worsening of hepatitis C virus (HCV). We set out to assimilate existing data for these complications, in order to help inform evidence-based risk assessments for the use of TCZ, and thus to reduce the risk of serious but preventable complications. Methods: We searched the global WHO database of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) ("VigiBase") and undertook a systematic literature review, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We generated mean cumulative incidence estimates for infection complications. Results: Mean cumulative incidence of HBV and TB were 3.3 and 4.3%, respectively, in patients receiving TCZ. Insufficient data were available to generate estimates for HCV. These estimates derive from heterogeneous studies pre-dating SARS-CoV-2, with differing epidemiology and varied approaches to screening and prophylaxis, so formal meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusions: We underline the need for careful individual risk assessment prior to TCZ prescription, and present an algorithm to guide clinical stratification. There is an urgent need for ongoing collation of safety data as TCZ therapy is used in COVID.
RESUMEN
Patients with suspected peri-operative anaphylaxis (POP) require thorough investigation to identify underlying trigger(s) and enable safe anesthesia for subsequent surgery. The changing epidemiology of POP has been striking. Previous estimates of the incidence of POP have ranged between 1:6,000 and1:20,000 anesthetics, but more recent data from France and the United Kingdom suggest an estimated incidence of 1:10,000. Other important changes include a change in the hierarchy of well-recognized triggers, with antibiotics (beta-lactams) supplanting neuromuscular blockers (NMB) as the leading cause of POP. The emergence of chlorhexidine, patent blue dye, and teicoplanin as important triggers have also been noteworthy findings. The mainstay of investigation revolves around critical analysis of the time-line of events leading up to anaphylaxis coupled with judicious skin testing. Skin tests have limitations with respect to unknown predictive values for most drugs/agents and therefore, knowledge of background positivity in healthy controls, test characteristics of individual drugs and the use of non-irritant concentrations is essential to avoid both false-positive and false-negative results. Specific IgE assays for individual drugs are available only for a limited number of agents and are not a substitute for skin testing. Acute serum total tryptase has a high specificity and positive predictive value in IgE-mediated POP anaphylaxis but is limited by its moderate sensitivity and negative predictive value. Planning for safe anesthesia in this group of patients is particularly challenging and consequently anesthetists need to be alert to the possibility of repeat episodes of anaphylaxis. Because of the limitations of current investigations for POP, collecting systematic data on the outcome of repeat anesthesia is valuable in validating current investigatory approaches. This paper reviews the changing epidemiology of POP with reference to the main triggers, and the investigation and outcome of subsequent anesthesia.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/etiología , Periodo Perioperatorio , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/terapia , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Pronóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas , Evaluación de SíntomasRESUMEN
Spurious penicillin allergy (PenA) is a major public health problem. Up to 10% of the population and 20% of inpatients are labelled with PenA, but only <5%-10% have a proven allergy following comprehensive investigations. PenA tests are labour intensive and require specialist input, which may not be readily available due to limited allergy services. Therefore, patients with PenA receive alternative antibiotics that are associated with higher rates of iatrogenic infections, antimicrobial resistance and a longer hospital stay with consequent increased costs. Recent evidence suggests that a supervised 'direct' oral amoxicillin challenge (without performing allergy tests) is a safe option in low-risk patients (those least likely to be allergic based on history). Patient selection for this procedure is based on a careful guideline-based risk stratification process. Further research is needed to validate this intervention in routine clinical practice and explore potential facilitators and barriers to implementation in different healthcare settings.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Riesgo , Pruebas CutáneasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to paucity of evidence to guide management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections national and international guidelines make disparate recommendations. METHODS: The outcomes of allo-HSCT recipients with RSV infection between 2015 and 2017 were assessed using the following treatment stratification; upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) being actively monitored and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) treated with short courses of oral ribavirin combined with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG, 2 g/kg). RESULTS: During the study period 49 RSV episodes were diagnosed (47% URTI and 53% LRTI). All patients with URTI recovered without pharmacological intervention. Progression from URTI to LRTI occurred in 15%. Treatment with oral ribavirin given until significant symptomatic improvement (median 7 days [3-12]) and IVIG for LRTI was generally well tolerated. RSV-attributable mortality was low (2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, we demonstrate that active monitoring of allo-HSCT patients with RSV in the absence of LRTI was only associated with progression to LRTI in 15% of our patients and therefore appears to be a safe approach. Short course oral ribavirin in combination with IVIG was effective and well-tolerated for LRTI making it a practical alternative to aerosolised ribavirin. This approach was beneficial in reducing hospitalisation, saving nursing times and by using oral as opposed to nebulised ribavirin.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/virología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/clasificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The association of B cell targeted therapies with development of hypogammaglobulinaemia and infection is increasingly recognized. Our aim was to develop consensus recommendations for immunoglobulin replacement therapy for management of hypogammaglobulinaemia following B cell targeted therapies in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. METHODS: A modified Delphi exercise involved a 17-member Taskforce committee, consisting of immunologists, rheumatologists, nephrologists, haematologists, a gastroenterologist, an immunology specialist nurse and a patient representative. The first round identified the most pertinent topics to address in the recommendations. A search string was agreed upon for the identification of publications in PubMed focusing on these areas, for a systematic literature review. Original data was presented from this review to the Taskforce committee. Recommendations from the British Society for Rheumatology, the UK Department of Health, EULAR, the ACR, and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology were also reviewed. The evidence was discussed in a face-to-face meeting to formulate recommendation statements. The levels of evidence and statements were graded according to Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS: Three overarching principles, eight recommendation statements and a research agenda were formulated. The Taskforce committee voted on these statements, achieving 82-100% agreement for each recommendation. The strength of the recommendations was restricted by the low quality of the available evidence, with no randomized controlled trial data. The recommendations cover risk factors, monitoring, referral for hypogammaglobulinaemia; indications, dosage and discontinuation of immunoglobulin replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: These are the first recommendations specifically formulated for B cell targeted therapies related to hypogammaglobulinaemia in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The recommendations are to aid health-care professionals with clinical decision making for patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfocitos B , Inmunización Pasiva/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Comités Consultivos , Agammaglobulinemia/inmunología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/inmunología , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The role of clinical pathologists or laboratory-based physicians is being challenged on several fronts-exponential advances in technology, increasing patient autonomy exercised in the right to directly request tests and the use of non-medical specialists as substitutes. In response, clinical pathologists have focused their energies on the pre-analytical and postanalytical phases of Laboratory Medicine thus emphasising their essential role in individualised medical interpretation of complex laboratory results. Across the European Union, the role of medical doctors is enshrined in the Medical Act. This paper highlights the relevance of this act to patient welfare and the need to strengthen training programmes to prevent an erosion in the quality of Laboratory Medicine provided to patients and their physicians.
Asunto(s)
Patología Clínica , Autonomía Personal , Médicos , Medicina de Precisión , Humanos , Patología Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patología Clínica/normas , Medicina de Precisión/normasRESUMEN
The article Assessment of Local Adverse Reactions to Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin (SCIG) in Clinical Trials, written by Mark Ballow, Richard L. Wasserman, Stephen Jolles, Helen Chapel, Mel Berger, Siraj A. Misbah, was originally published Online First without open access.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunologists are increasingly being asked to assess patients with non-classical and secondary antibody deficiency to determine their potential need for immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT). Immunoglobulin is a limited, expensive resource and no clear guidance exists for this broad patient group. The purpose of this survey is to establish what factors influence the decision to commence IGRT in adult patients, when diagnostic criteria for primary antibody deficiency are not fulfilled. METHODS: Under the auspices of the United Kingdom Primary Immunodeficiency Network (UKPIN), a study group was established which circulated an online questionnaire to the consultant body across the UK and Ireland. Results provided a snapshot of the current clinical practice of 71% of consultant immunologists, from 30 centers. RESULTS: In order of importance, factors which influence the decision to commence IGRT include number of hospital admissions with infection, serum IgG level, bronchiectasis, radiologically proven pneumonia, number of positive sputum cultures, number of antibiotic courses, and results of immunization studies. The commonest test vaccine used was Pneumovax 23 with measurement of serotype-specific responses at 4 weeks, with a threshold of 0.35 µg/ml in 2/3 of serotypes measured. Eighty-six percent of patients are treated with a trial of prophylactic antibiotics prior to consideration of IGRT. Efficacy of IGRT trial is assessed at between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: There was consistency in clinical practice using a combination of clinical history, evidence of infections, and vaccination testing for diagnosis. However, there was some variation in the implementation of this practice, particularly in vaccine choice and assessment of response to vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Agammaglobulinemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Agammaglobulinemia/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Agammaglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas , Irlanda/epidemiología , Masculino , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta , Reino Unido/epidemiología , VacunaciónAsunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Meningitis Bacterianas/microbiología , Adulto , Animales , Peces , Polisacáridos , Alimentos MarinosAsunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , América del Norte , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
The role of CD1a-reactive T cells in human allergic disease is unknown. We have previously shown that circulating CD1a-reactive T cells recognize neolipid antigens generated by bee and wasp venom phospholipase, and here tested the hypothesis that venom-responsive CD1a-reactive T cells associate with venom allergy. Circulating T cells from bee and wasp venom allergic individuals, before and during immunotherapy, were exposed to CD1a-transfected K562 cells in the presence of wasp or bee venom. T-cell response was evaluated based on IFNγ, GM-CSF, and IL-13 cytokine production. Venom allergic individuals showed significantly higher frequencies of IFN-γ, GM-CSF, and IL-13 producing CD1a-reactive T cells responsive to venom and venom-derived phospholipase than healthy individuals. Venom-responsive CD1a-reactive T cells were cross-responsive between wasp and bee suggesting shared pathways of allergenicity. Frequencies of CD1a-reactive T cells were initially induced during subcutaneous immunotherapy, peaking by weeks 5, but then reduced despite escalation of antigen dose. Our current understanding of venom allergy and immunotherapy is largely based on peptide and protein-specific T cell and antibody responses. Here, we show that lipid antigens and CD1a-reactive T cells associate with the allergic response. These data have implications for mechanisms of allergy and approaches to immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Venenos de Abeja/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Venenos de Avispas/inmunología , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Antígenos CD1/inmunología , Venenos de Abeja/efectos adversos , Separación Celular , Reacciones Cruzadas , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Ensayo de Immunospot Ligado a Enzimas , Femenino , Humanos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Venenos de Avispas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Antibody deficiency can occur in the context of primary immune deficiency due to inherited genetic defects or secondary to a variety of causes. This review aims to summarize current data concerning the causes of secondary antibody deficiency and where possible evidence regarding the use of prophylactic replacement immunoglobulin. (Figure is included in full-text article.) RECENT FINDINGS: Advances in immune-mediated therapies ranging from monoclonal antibodies to novel B-cell-targeted therapeutics are responsible for an expansion in the possible iatrogenic causes of antibody deficiency. SUMMARY: Causes of secondary antibody deficiency include B-cell lymphoproliferative disease, notably chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma, protein losing states, disorders of lymphatic circulation, increased immunoglobulin catabolism and a growing number of therapeutic agents. At-risk patients should be closely monitored for the development of hypogammaglobulinaemia, B-cell function should be defined where appropriate with specific antibody responses to immunization antigens and where there is a significant burden of infections patients should be treated with prophylactic antibiotics and/or replacement immunoglobulin.