Evaluation of an educational program to prevent adolescent pregnancy.

The authors evaluated the effectiveness of a school-based sex education program in decreasing rates of sexual intercourse, improving birth control use, and decreasing the incidence of pregnancies among teenagers 16 years of age and younger. Twenty-one schools received either the McMaster Teen Program or the conventional didactic sex education program. Preprogram, the mean age of the students was 12.6 years. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in time to first sexual activity for males, chi 2(1) = 2.93, p = 0.09; time to first sexual activity for females, chi 2(1) = 0.50, p = 0.48; and time to first pregnancy, chi 2(1) = 1.90, p = 0.17. Significantly more experimental group males reported always using birth control at year 1 (difference 8.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.4, 17.4). Limitations of the program that may have influenced the results were the exclusion of contraception information and its short duration.

A controlled trial of nurse practitioners in neonatal intensive care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare a clinical nurse specialist/neonatal practitioner (CNS/NP) team with a pediatric resident team in the delivery of neonatal intensive care. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: A 33-bed tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Of 821 infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit between September 1991 and September 1992, 414 were randomized to care by the CNS/NP team, and 407 were randomized to care by the pediatric resident team. INTERVENTION: Infants assigned to the CNS/NPs team were cared for by CNS/NPs during the day and by pediatric residents during the night. Infants assigned to the pediatric resident team were cared for by pediatric residents around the clock. Neonatologists supervised both teams. MEASURES: Outcome measures included mortality; number of neonatal complications; length of stay; quality of care, as assessed by a quantitative indicator condition approach; parent satisfaction with care, measured using the Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction; long-term outcomes, measured using the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory; and costs. RESULTS: There were 19 (4.6%) deaths in the CNS/NP group and 24 (5.9%) in the resident group (relative risk [RR], 0.78; confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 1.40). In the CNS/NP group, 230 (55.6%) neonates had complications, in comparison with 220 (54.1%) in the resident group (RR, 1.03; CI 0.91 to 1.16). Mean lengths of stay were 12.5 days in the CNS/NP group and 11.7 days in the resident group (difference in means, 0.8 days; CI, -1.1 to 2.7). The performance on the indicator conditions was comparable in the two groups except for two instances, jaundice and charting, both of which favored the CNS/NP group. Mean scores on the Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction were 140 in the CNS/NP group and 139 in the resident group (difference in means, 1.0; CI, -3.6 to 5.6). In the CNS/NP group, 6 (2.6%) infants performed 30% or more below their age level in the Minnesota Infant Development Inventory, in comparison with 2 (0.9%) in the resident group (RR, 2.87; CI, 0.59 to 14.06) The cost per infant in the CNS/NP group was $14,245 and in the resident group $13,267 (difference in means, $978; CI, -1303.18 to 3259.05). CONCLUSIONS: CNS/NP and resident teams are similar with respect to all tested measures of performance. These results support the use of CNS/NPs as an alternative to pediatric residents in delivering care to critically ill neonates.

A new measure of parent satisfaction with medical care provided in the neonatal intensive care unit.

The objective of this study was to develop a valid and reliable discriminative index that measures parent satisfaction with the medical care of their infant in the NICU. We developed an initial questionnaire (Item Reduction Questionnaire) by reviewing the literature, surveying 63 NICU clinicians, and interviewing 125 parents of infants in 2 tertiary level NICUs regarding what they liked and disliked about the medical care of their infants. We administered the Item Reduction Questionnaire, which included 154 items, to 60 parents, who rated the frequency and importance of these items. We included the items identified most frequently as sources of dissatisfaction and rated most important in a second, briefer instrument, the Neonatal Index of Parent Satisfaction (NIPS). To measure reliability we administered the NIPS to 47 parents twice, separated by a 1-week interval. We assessed validity by comparing actual to predicted correlations between NIPS scores and other measures: parent's global rating of satisfaction, medical caregiver ratings of mother's satisfaction, medical caregiver ratings of father's satisfaction, and parents' perception of their infant's health status. We also compared mean NIPS scores for parents who did and who did not report incidents when errors occurred in the medical care of the infant. Of 154 items generated, we included 27 in the NIPS. The intraclass correlation between two administrations of the NIPS to the same 47 parents was 0.71. As predicted, there was a high correlation (0.61) between the NIPS score and parent global rating of satisfaction, and much lower correlations with other variables. Mean NIPS scores for parents who did and who did not report errors differed significantly (difference, 14.6; 95% CI around difference, 5.8-23.5; p < 0.001). The NIPS is likely to be a useful measure for discriminating between parents who differ in terms of their satisfaction with the medical care of their infant in the NICU.

Quality of life as an outcome measure in nursing research. "May you have a long and healthy life".

Quality of life has emerged as an important concept and outcome in health and health care. Policy-makers, researchers, clinicians, and the public at large consider perceived quality of life to be an important dimension of the health of a population or an individual. The nature of nursing is such that many of its anticipated outcomes relate to improvement in the quality of life of individuals and populations. There continues to be debate about the actual definition of quality of life, and a concept that is difficult to define will naturally pose challenges to measurement. This has not impeded the proliferation of quality-of-life instruments, since the concept is recognized as an increasingly important clinical and research outcome. Progress has been made in clarifying and operationalizing the concept. We propose a conceptual viewpoint that separates what quality of life is from what contributes to quality of life. This will assist nurse researchers planning to use quality of life as an outcome in evaluating nursing interventions. In clinical or research situations, for the purposes of measurement, an operational definition of quality of life stems from a definition of health. From this is drawn a definition of health-related quality of life (HRQL). For the purpose of outcome measurement, the operational definition relates to the domains important to the study population and the particular health intervention under study. Issues that arise in the measurement of HRQL are also presented.