Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 110(1): 116327, 2024 May 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878342

RESUMEN

Whether cross-infection of respiratory pathogens between patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis occurs is debated. Investigation with traditional microbiological culture risks simplifying the lung microbiome. We demonstrate the use of culture-independent Multilocus sequence typing to screen for Haemophilus influenzae strain types in a cohort of twenty-eight patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

2.
Phage (New Rochelle) ; 4(1): 4-10, 2023 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37214654

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial resistance is leading to increased mortality, posing risk to those with chronic suppurative lung disease (CSLD). One therapeutic option may be to target treatment-resistant bacteria using viruses (bacteriophages [phages]). Currently, patients receiving phage therapy on compassionate grounds may not be receiving optimal treatment as there is no defined approach for phage use. This review aims to explore administration route, regimen, and need for supplementary antibiotics in phage therapy to treat bacterial infection in CSLD. Twelve articles totaling 18 participants included details of numerous phage administration routes with varying regimens. All articles reported an initial reduction of bacterial load or an improvement in patient symptoms, highlighting the potential of phage therapy in CSLD. Fifteen out of 18 used supplementary antibiotics. Standardized protocols informed by high-quality research are necessary to ensure safe and effective phage therapy. In the interim, systematic recording of information within case reports may be useful.

3.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(8): 1096-1108, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34015531

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common reason to seek medical care, with many patients receiving inappropriate antibiotics. Novel testing approaches to identify aetiology at the point-of-care are required to accurately guide antibiotic treatment. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of biomarker combinations to rapidly differentiate between acute bacterial or viral RTI aetiology. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched to February 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Diagnostic accuracy studies comparing accuracy of point-of-care and rapid diagnostic tests in primary or secondary care, consisting of biomarker combinations, to identify bacterial or viral aetiology of RTI. METHODS: Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificity of tests reported by more than one study were meta-analysed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty observational studies (3514 patients) were identified. Eighteen were judged at high risk of bias. For bacterial aetiologies, sensitivity ranged from 61% to 100% and specificity from 18% to 96%. For viral aetiologies, sensitivity ranged from 59% to 97% and specificity from 74% to 100%. Studies evaluating two commercial tests were meta-analysed. For ImmunoXpert, the summary sensitivity and specificity were 85% (95% CI 75%-91%, k = 4) and 86% (95% CI 73%-93%, k = 4) for bacterial infections, and 90% (95% CI 79%-96%, k = 3) and 92% (95% CI 83%-96%, k = 3) for viral infections, respectively. FebriDx had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 84% (95% CI 75%-90%, k = 4) and 93% (95% CI 90%-95%, k = 4) for bacterial infections, and 87% (95% CI 72%-95%; k = 4) and 82% (95% CI 66%-86%, k = 4) for viral infections, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combinations of biomarkers show potential clinical utility in discriminating the aetiology of RTIs. However, the limitations in the evidence base, due to a high proportion of studies with high risk of bias, preclude firm conclusions. Future research should be in primary care and evaluate patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness with experimental study designs. CLINICAL TRIAL: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178973.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Bacterianas , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Virosis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Virosis/diagnóstico , Virosis/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 100(1): 115315, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33571861

RESUMEN

The genotyping of pathogens within cystic fibrosis cohorts is an important process, enabling the detection of transmissible and clinically-important strains. Traditionally this has been via culture-dependent processes. However, culture-independent investigation of respiratory samples is becoming more common, with such approaches highlighting the limitations of culture-based methods. In this study we describe the culture-independent application of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, performed on DNA extracted from the sputa of cystic fibrosis patients. We compare the output to conventional culture-dependent MLST applied to the same samples and demonstrate high concordance. Culture-independent MLST enabled genotyping of culture-negative samples in patients from whom P. aeruginosa was intermittently isolated, and revealed the hidden presence of transmissible strains. Culture-independent MLST is also capable of highlighting samples containing multiple strains, albeit inconsistently. We conclude that culture-independent MLST can be a useful genotyping tool for screening cohorts and identifying patients that warrant further detailed investigation.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Infección Hospitalaria , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus/métodos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Esputo/microbiología
6.
Thorax ; 2017 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28844058

RESUMEN

While Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) cross-infection is well documented among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), the equivalent risk among patients with non-CF bronchiectasis (NCFB) is unclear, particularly those managed alongside patients with CF. We performed analysis of PA within a single centre that manages an unsegregated NCFB cohort alongside a segregated CF cohort. We found no evidence of cross-infection between the two cohorts or within the segregated CF cohort. However, within the unsegregated NCFB cohort, evidence of cross-infection was found between three (of 46) patients. While we do not presently advocate any change in the management of our NCFB cohort, longitudinal surveillance is clearly warranted.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...