Comparación de biomarcadores inflamatorios plasmáticos en pacientes con SIM-PedS versus infecciones potencialmente graves en pacientes pediátricos / Comparison of plasma inflammatory biomarkers between MIS-C and potentially serious infections in pediatric patients

Introducción: Los biomarcadores inflamatorios se han utilizado para el diagnóstico y tratamiento del síndrome inflamatorio multisistémico en niños (SIM-PedS). Nuestro objetivo fue determinar cómo se comportan estos biomarcadores inflamatorios en pacientes con síndrome febril orientados en principio como infección bacteriana potencialmente grave y comparar los hallazgos clínicos y de laboratorio con los casos SIM-PedS. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte observacional ambispectivo unicéntrico (junio de 2020-febrero de 2022). Analizamos la demografía, los síntomas clínicos y los hallazgos de laboratorio en casos SIM-PedS y en casos de síndrome febril de otras etiologías infecciosas de pacientes menores de 15 años con ingreso hospitalario. Resultados: Incluimos a 54 pacientes con sospecha analítica de infección bacteriana y a 20 pacientes con SIM-PedS para el análisis. La fiebre (100%), los hallazgos gastrointestinales (80%) y mucocutáneos (35%) fueron más frecuentes en los pacientes con SIM-PedS, también la hipotensión (36,8%) y la taquicardia (55%). Los hallazgos de laboratorio mostraron niveles significativamente elevados de pro-BNP (70%), ferritina (35%), dímeros D (80%) así como linfopenia (55%) y trombocitopenia (27,8%) en los casos de SIM-PedS. Los valores de IL-6 fueron elevados en pacientes sin SIM-PedS (92,6%). Conclusiones: En el manejo de pacientes con SIM-PedS, la monitorización dinámica de pro-BNP, ferritina, dímero D, linfocitos y plaquetas podría ser útil para evaluar efectivamente el progreso de la enfermedad en las primeras fases. Los valores de IL-6 pueden elevarse de forma significativa en pacientes con síndrome febril de otras etiologías, así como los dímeros D. El uso de diversos biomarcadores de laboratorio podría ayudar a determinar precozmente la evolución de los pacientes con síndrome febril.(AU)

Background: Inflammatory biomarkers have been used for the diagnosis and management of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings of MIS-C cases versus other febrile cases cataloged as potentially suspected bacterial infection (non-MIS-C). Methods: Unicentric ambispective observational cohort study (June 2020 to February 2022). We analyzed demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in MIS-C cases and in non-MIS-C cases with febrile processes of patients under 15 years of age admitted to hospital. Results: We enrolled 54 patients with potential suspected bacterial infection and 20 patients with MIS-C for analysis. Fever (100%), gastrointestinal (80%) and mucocutaneous findings (35%) were common in MIS-C patients, also hypotension (36.8%) and tachycardia (55%). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated proBNP (70%), ferritin (35%), D-dimer (80%) and lymphopenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (27.8%) in MIS-C cases. IL-6 values were high in non-MIS-C patients (92.6%). Conclusions: In the management of MIS-C patients, the dynamic monitoring of proBNP, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and platelets could be helpful to pediatricians to effectively evaluate the progress of MIS-C in the early phases, not IL-6 values. The applicability of the IL-6 level as a prognostic biomarker in MIS-C patients may require closer discussion. In addition, the optimal laboratory markers, as stated in our study, can help establish a biomarkers model to early distinguish the MIS-C versus non-MIS-C in patients who are admitted to febrile syndrome.(AU)

Comparison of plasma inflammatory biomarkers between MIS-C and potentially serious infections in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory biomarkers have been used for the diagnosis and management of multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). We aimed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings of MIS-C cases versus other febrile cases cataloged as potentially suspected bacterial infection (non-MIS-C). METHODS: Unicentric ambispective observational cohort study (June 2020-February 2022). We analyzed demographics, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings in MIS-C cases and in non-MIS-C cases with febrile processes of patients under 15 years of age admitted to hospital. RESULTS: We enrolled 54 patients with potential suspected bacterial infection and 20 patients with MIS-C for analysis. Fever (100%), gastrointestinal (80%) and mucocutaneous findings (35%) were common in MIS-C patients, also hypotension (36.8%) and tachycardia (55%). Laboratory findings showed significantly elevated proBNP (70%), ferritin (35%), D-dimer (80%) and lymphopenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (27.8%) in MIS-C cases. IL-6 values were high in non-MIS-C patients (92.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In the management of MIS-C patients, the dynamic monitoring of proBNP, ferritin, D-dimer, lymphocytes and platelets could be helpful to pediatricians to effectively evaluate the progress of MIS-C in the early phases, not IL-6 values. The applicability of the IL-6 level as a prognostic biomarker in MIS-C patients may require closer discussion. In addition, the optimal laboratory markers, as stated in our study, can help establish a biomarkers model to early distinguish the MIS-C versus non-MIS-C in patients who are admitted to febrile syndrome.