Impact of travel burden on the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although historic studies of state registries have demonstrated decreased radiation therapy use for patients with breast cancer living further away from radiation facilities, the association between travel distance and breast cancer treatment in a modern national cohort remains unknown. METHODS: Female patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative pathologic stages I to II breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2018-2020) and dichotomized by distance ≤20 miles or >20 miles (75th percentile) from the treatment facility. The association between travel distance and type of surgery and treatment administered was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression and after 1:1 propensity matching. RESULTS: Of the 293,318 patients identified for inclusion, the median age was 63 years, and most patients (n = 190,567, 65%) lived ≤20 miles of the treatment facility. Patients with a travel burden >20 miles were more likely to receive a mastectomy (≤20 miles 30.4% vs >20 miles 34.0%, P < .001; odds ratio 1.14, P = .016), and less likely to receive radiation (≤20 miles 63.3% vs >20% miles 60.1%, P < .001; odds ratio 0.81, P < .001). These findings persisted after propensity score matching (n = 33,544 per cohort), with patients living further being more likely to undergo a mastectomy (≤20 miles 30.3% vs >20 miles 35.3%, P < .001) and less likely to receive radiation (≤ 20 miles 65.4% vs. >20 miles 58.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with hormone receptor-positive stage I to II breast cancer with a larger travel burden are more likely to receive a mastectomy and less likely to undergo radiation therapy to treat their disease.

Delayed time to radiation and overall survival in Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is commonly treated with surgical excision and radiotherapy. The relationship between time to adjuvant radiotherapy and overall survival (OS) remains understudied. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Patients with clinically localized MCC who received surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy were included. Multivariate regressions were used to account for various patient and tumor factors. The primary outcome was 5-year OS, and the secondary outcome was time from diagnosis to adjuvant radiation (TTR). RESULTS: Of the 1965 patients included, most were male (n = 1242, 63.2%) and white (n = 1915, 97.5%), and the median age was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-81). The median TTR was 83 days (IQR: 65-106). A total of 83.6% of patients received radiotherapy to the primary site, 21.3% to the draining nodal basin, 17.1% to both, and 12.2% whose target location of radiotherapy was not recorded in the data. TTR of ≥79 days (the 45th percentile) was associated with worse OS on both univariate and multivariate analyses (log-rank p = 0.0014; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.258, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.055-1.500, p = 0.010). This persisted on sub-analyses of patients <80 years old (n = 1407; HR: 1.380, 95% CI: 1.080-1.764, p = 0.010) and of patients with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 (n = 1411; HR: 1.284, 95% CI: 1.034-1.595, p = 0.024). Factors associated with delayed TTR included greater age (p = 0.039), male sex (p = 0.04), CCI > 1 (p = 0.036), academic facility (p < 0.001), rural county (p = 0.034), AJCC T2 stage (p = 0.010), negative margins (p = 0.017), 2+ pathologically positive regional nodes (p = 0.011), and margin size >2 cm (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed radiotherapy (≥79 days) was associated with worse OS of MCC patients. Further study in controlled cohorts is needed to ascertain this relationship.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A National Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial, with the mainstay of treatment being surgery. While neoadjuvant radiation demonstrated no improvement in recurrence-free survival in a prospective randomized trial (STRASS), the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unknown and is the subject of ongoing study (STRASS2). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade RP leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) were identified from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Differences in 5-year survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and by Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: A total of 2656 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent of patients had DDLS and 43.5% had LMS. Six percent of patients underwent NCT. Patients who received NCT were younger (median age 60 vs 64 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have LMS (OR 1.4, p = 0.04). In comparing NCT with no-NCT patients, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) on KM analysis (57.3% vs 52.8%, p = 0.38), nor was any difference seen after propensity matching (54.9% vs 49.1%, p = 0.48, N = 144 per group). When stratified by histology, there was no difference in OS based on receipt of NCT (LMS: 59.8% for NCT group, 56.6% for no-NCT, p = 0.34; DDLS: 54.2% for NCT group, 50.1% for no-NCT, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical resection of RP LMS or DDLS, NCT does not appear to confer an OS advantage. Prospective randomized data from STRASS2 will confirm or refute these retrospective data.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiation for trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) develop distant metastases. Meta-analyses suggest that chemotherapy confers a small survival benefit, though few studies focus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). There has been more frequent use of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) in STS, but the utility of NCT for these patients remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with stage II-III trunk/extremity STS who underwent NRT and resection were identified using the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using logistic regression. Change in rate of NCT use over time was assessed using log-linear regression modeling. Survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Of 5740 patients, 25% underwent NCT. The overall median age was 62, 55% of patients were male, and 67% had stage III disease. The most common histological subtypes were fibrosarcoma/myxofibrosarcoma (39%) and liposarcoma (16%). Use of NCT decreased by 4.0% per year throughout the study period (p < 0.01). Predictors of NCT included younger age (median 54, IQR 42-64 vs. median 65, IQR 53-75, p < 0.01), treatment at an academic center (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, p < 0.01), and stage III disease (OR 2.2, p < 0.01). Histologic predictors of NCT included synovial sarcoma (52%) and angiosarcoma (45%). With a median follow-up time of 77 months, NCT was associated with improved 5-year survival compared to NRT alone on KM analysis (70% vs. 63%, p < 0.01). This difference persisted on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.86, p = 0.027) and after propensity matching (70% vs. 65%, p = 0.0064). CONCLUSION: Despite risk of distant failure in high-risk STS, use of NCT has decreased over time in patients receiving NRT. In this retrospective analysis, NCT was associated with a modestly improved overall survival.

Impact of Patient Comorbidities on Presentation Stage of Breast and Colon Cancers.

BACKGROUND: While patients with multiple comorbidities may have frequent contact with medical providers, it is unclear whether their healthcare visits translate into earlier detection of cancers, specifically breast and colon cancers. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-IV breast ductal carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified by comorbidity burden, dichotomized as a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Score of <2 or ≥2. Characteristics associated with comorbidities were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Propensity-score matching was performed to determine the impact of CCI on stage at cancer diagnosis, dichotomized as early (I-II) or late (III-IV). RESULTS: A total of 672,032 patients with colon adenocarcinoma and 2,132,889 with breast ductal carcinoma were included. Patients with colon adenocarcinoma who had a CCI ≥ 2 (11%, n = 72,620) were more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage disease (53% vs. 47%; odds ratio [OR] 1.02, p = 0.017), and this finding persisted after propensity matching (CCI ≥ 2 55% vs. CCI < 2 53%, p < 0.001). Patients with breast ductal carcinoma who had a CCI ≥ 2 (4%, n = 85,069) were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (15% vs. 12%; OR 1.35, p < 0.001). This finding also persisted after propensity matching (CCI ≥ 2 14% vs. CCI < 2 10%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more comorbidities are more likely to present with early-stage colon cancers but late-stage breast cancers. This finding may reflect differences in practice patterns for routine screening in these patients. Providers should continue guideline directed screenings to detect cancers at an earlier stage and optimize outcomes.

Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Among Adults With Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Importance: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Pembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Results: This study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy status improves adjuvant therapy decision-making in patients with clinical stage IIB/C melanoma: A population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Given the results of the recent KEYNOTE-716 trial, the performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for patients with clinical stage IIB/C melanoma has been questioned. OBJECTIVE: Determine the utility of SLN status in guiding the recommendations for adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Patients with clinical stage IIB/C cutaneous melanoma who underwent wide local excision and SLN biopsy between 2004 and 2011 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Two prognostic models, with and without SLN status, were developed predicting risk of melanoma-specific death (MSD). The primary outcome was net benefit at treatment thresholds of 20% to 40% risk of 5-year MSD. RESULTS: For the 4391 patients included, the 5-year MSD rate was 46%. The model estimating 5-year MSD risk that included SLN status provided greater net benefit at treatment thresholds from 30% to 78% compared to the model without SLN status. The added net benefit for the SLN biopsy-containing model persisted in subgroup analysis of patients in different age groups and with various T stages. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model with SLN status estimating patient risk for 5-year MSD provides superior net benefit compared to a model with primary tumor staging factors alone for threshold mortality rates ≥30%.

Quality and readability assessment of online patient information on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aim to assess the quality and readability of online information available to patients considering cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). METHODS: The top three search engines (Google, Bing, and Yahoo) were searched in March 2022. Websites were classified as academic, hospital-affiliated, foundation/advocacy, commercial, or unspecified. Quality of information was assessed using the JAMA benchmark criteria (0-4) and DISCERN tool (16-80), and the presence of a Health On the Net code (HONcode) seal. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease score. RESULTS: Fifty unique websites were included. The average JAMA and DISCERN scores of all websites were 0.72 ± 1.14 and 39.58 ± 13.71, respectively. Foundation/advocacy websites had significantly higher JAMA mean score than commercial (p = 0.044), academic (p < 0.001), and hospital-affiliated websites (p = 0.001). Foundation/advocacy sites had a significantly higher DISCERN mean score than hospital-affiliated (p = 0.035) and academic websites (p = 0.030). The HONcode seal was present in 4 (8%) websites analyzed. Readability was difficult and at the level of college students. CONCLUSIONS: The overall quality of patient-oriented online information on CRS-HIPEC is poor and available resources may not be comprehensible to the general public. Patients seeking information on CRS-HIPEC should be directed to sites affiliated with foundation/advocacy organizations.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with T1a cutaneous malignant melanoma: A multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is not routinely recommended for T1a cutaneous melanoma due to the overall low risk of positivity. Prognostic factors for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN+) in this population are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with SLN+ in patients with T1a melanoma. METHODS: Patients with pathologic T1a (<0.80 mm, nonulcerated) cutaneous melanoma from 5 high-volume melanoma centers from 2001 to 2020 who underwent wide local excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics associated with SLN+ were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Age was dichotomized into ≤42 (25% quartile cutoff) and >42 years. RESULTS: Of the 965 patients identified, the overall SLN+ was 4.4% (N = 43). Factors associated with SLN+ were age ≤42 years (7.5% vs 3.7%; odds ratio [OR], 2.14; P = .03), head/neck primary tumor location (9.2% vs 4%; OR, 2.75; P = .04), lymphovascular invasion (21.4% vs 4.2%; OR, 5.64; P = .01), and ≥2 mitoses/mm2 (8.2% vs 3.4%; OR, 2.31; P = .03). Patients <42 years with ≥2 mitoses/mm2 (N = 38) had a SLN+ rate of 18.4%. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study. CONCLUSION: SLN+ is low in patients with T1a melanomas, but younger age, lymphovascular invasion, mitogenicity, and head/neck primary site appear to confer a higher risk of SLN+.

National Practice Patterns in the Management of the Regional Lymph Node Basin After Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis from cutaneous melanoma has been replaced largely by ultrasound nodal surveillance since the publication of two landmark trials in 2016 and 2017. National practice patterns of CLND remain poorly characterized. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in 2016 and 2018 without clinical nodal disease who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Characteristics associated with CLND were analyzed by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 3517 patients included in the study, 1405 had disease diagnosed in 2016. The patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2016 had a median age of 60 years and a tumor thickness of 2.3 mm compared to 62 years and 2.4 mm, respectively, for the patients with cutaneous melanoma diagnosed in 2018. According to the NCDB, 40 % (n = 559) of the patients underwent CLND in 2016 compared with 6 % (n = 132) in 2018. The factors associated with receipt of CLND in 2018 included younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.99; p = 0.001), rural residence (OR, 3.96; 95 % CI, 1.50-10.49; p = 0.006), head/neck tumor location (OR, 1.88; 95 % CI, 1.10-3.23; p = 0.021), and more than one positive SLN (OR, 1.80; 95 % CI, 1.17-2.76; p = 0.007). The 5-year OS did not differ between the patients who received SLNB only and those who underwent CLND (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.54). CONCLUSION: The rates of CLND have decreased nationally. However, patients with head/neck primary tumors who live in rural locations are more likely to undergo CLND, highlighting populations for which treatment may be non-uniform with national practice patterns.