RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) is associated with high mortality rates. Patients admitted during off-hours, specifically on weekends and at night, show higher mortality rates, which is called the "off-hours effect". The off-hours effect in patients with STEMI-CS treated with mechanical circulatory support, especially Impella, has not been fully evaluated. AIMS: We aimed to investigate whether off-hours admissions were associated with higher mortality rates in this population. METHODS: We used large-scale Japanese registry data for consecutive patients treated with Impella between February 2020 and December 2021 and compared on- and off-hours admissions. On- and off-hours were defined as the time between 8:00 and 19:59 on weekdays and the remaining time, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1,207 STEMI patients, 566 (46.9%) patients (mean age: 69 years; 107 females) with STEMI-CS treated with Impella were included. Of these, 300 (53.0%) were admitted during on-hours. During the follow-up period (median 22 days [interquartile range 13-38 days]), 112 (42.1%) and 91 (30.3%) deaths were observed among patients admitted during off- and on-hours, respectively. Off-hours admissions were independently associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality than on-hours admissions (aHR 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.39; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicated the persistence of the "off-hours effect" in STEMI-CS patients treated with Impella. Healthcare professionals should continue to address the disparities in cardiovascular care by improving the timely provision of evidence-based treatments and enhancing off-hours medical services.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Sistema de Registros , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Corazón Auxiliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Japón/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vessel-level physiological data derived from pressure wire measurements are one of the important determinant factors in the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with multivessel disease (MVD). However, these may result in complications and a prolonged procedure time. AIMS: The feasibility of using the quantitative flow ratio (QFR), an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR), in Heart Team discussions to determine the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with MVD was investigated. METHODS: Two Heart Teams were randomly assigned either QFR- or FFR-based data of the included patients. They then discussed the optimal revascularisation mode (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) for each patient and made treatment recommendations. The primary endpoint of the trial was the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams as assessed using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The trial included 248 patients with MVD from 10 study sites. Cohen's kappa in the recommended revascularisation modes between the QFR and FFR approaches was 0.73 [95% confidence interval {CI} : 0.62-0.83]. As for the revascularisation planning, agreements in the target vessels for PCI and CABG were substantial for both revascularisation modes (Cohen's kappa=0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78] and 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78], respectively). The team assigned to the QFR approach provided consistent recommended revascularisation modes even after being made aware of the FFR data (Cohen's kappa=0.95 [95% CI:0.90-1.00]). CONCLUSIONS: QFR provided feasible physiological data in Heart Team discussions to determine the optimal revascularisation strategy for MVD. The QFR and FFR approaches agreed substantially in terms of treatment recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Grupo de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
A 34-year-old transgender woman presented with ventricular tachycardia and was diagnosed with takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Further evaluation revealed an underlying diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) with brainstem lesions that may have triggered takotsubo cardiomyopathy. In this report, we also systematically reviewed published cases of takotsubo cardiomyopathy and MS and found that basal type takotsubo cardiomyopathy was the most common, and most patients presented with brainstem involvement of MS. An awareness of these associations by physicians, along with multidisciplinary collaboration, may facilitate the early diagnosis and improve the prognosis of these patients.
RESUMEN
In patients with multivessel disease (MVD), functional information on lesions improves the prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR®) is an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) that does not require a pressure wire or pharmacological hyperemia. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of QFR-based patient information in Heart Teams' discussions to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with MVD. We hypothesized that there is an acceptable agreement between treatment recommendations based on the QFR approach and recommendation based on the FFR approach. The DECISION QFR study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will include patients with MVD who require revascularization. Two Heart Teams comprising cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will be randomized to select a revascularization strategy (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft) according to patient information either based on QFR or on FFR. All 260 patients will be assessed by both teams with reference to the anatomical and functional SYNTAX score/SYNTAX score II 2020 derived from the allocated physiological index (QFR or FFR). The primary endpoint of the trial is the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams, assessed using Cohen's κ. As of March 2022, the patient enrollment has been completed and 230 patients have been discussed in both Heart Teams. The current trial will indicate the usefulness of QFR, which enables a wireless multivessel physiological interrogation, in the discussions of Heart Teams to determine the optimal revascularization strategy for MVD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Estenosis Coronaria , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios , Reserva del Flujo Fraccional Miocárdico/fisiología , Humanos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
The use of loop diuretics has been shown to deteriorate renal dysfunction and is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, has been reported to be effective in treating HF due to its potent effects of water diuresis and is expected to improve fluid retention without adversely affecting renal function. The present case is a 77-year-old man with pulmonary hypertension associated with chronic pulmonary artery thrombosis and old pulmonary tuberculosis who developed worsening right-sided HF with marked fluid retention and renal dysfunction. In this case, tolvaptan was effective in improving HF without deteriorating the patient's renal dysfunction.