The elucidation of key factors for oral absorption enhancement of nanocrystal formulations: In vitro-in vivo correlation of nanocrystals.

Nanocrystal formulation is a well-established approach for improving oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs. However, it is difficult to predict the in vivo performance of nanocrystal formulations from in vitro dissolution studies. The object of the present study was to investigate the in vitro-in vivo correlation of nanocrystal formulations of different particle sizes. A microsuspension and three nanosuspensions with different particle sizes for model drugs, fenofibrate and megestrol acetate, were prepared. In the comparison between the microsuspension and the nanosuspension having the smallest particle sizes, drug permeation rates from the nanosuspension were about 3-fold higher in the dissolution-permeation study. On the other hand, the solubility enhancement effect due to nanocrystal formation was only up by 1.4-fold, suggesting that nanocrystal formulations dramatically improved not the solubility but the apparent permeability. The oral absorption rate in rats increased with particle size reduction. There were positive and very strong correlations (R2 > 0.95) between the in vitro permeation rate and in vivo maximum absorption rate. We concluded that the enhanced permeability rate due to nanocrystal formation is the main factor for improving oral absorption, and the in vitro dissolution-permeation study could be useful for predicting oral absorption enhancement of nanocrystal formulations.

Metabolism, Excretion, and Pharmacokinetics of [14 C]-Cefiderocol (S-649266), a Siderophore Cephalosporin, in Healthy Subjects Following Intravenous Administration.

The objectives of this study were to characterize the concentration-time profiles of total radioactivity equivalent and unchanged cefiderocol, the route(s) of elimination and mass balance, and safety of cefiderocol after intravenous administration of a single 1000-mg (100 µCi) dose of [14 C]-cefiderocol as a 1-hour infusion in healthy adult male subjects. Unchanged cefiderocol accounted for the majority of total radioactivity in plasma, and the partitioning of total radioactivity into red blood cells was negligible. The recovery of total radioactivity was complete in all subjects within 120 hours after initiation of the infusion (101.5% of the administered dose). Cefiderocol-related material was primarily excreted into urine, with 98.7% of the administered dose of [14 C]-cefiderocol excreted as total radioactivity into urine and negligible excretion into feces. Based on the results of metabolite profiling, cefiderocol accounted for 92.3% of area under the concentration-time curve of total radioactivity in plasma and accounted for 90.6% of the administered dose excreted into urine. Metabolism was a minor route of elimination for cefiderocol. Cefiderocol was generally safe and well tolerated in healthy adult male subjects. In conclusion, unchanged cefiderocol represents the majority of total radioactivity in plasma. Cefiderocol is primarily excreted as unchanged drug into urine. This study indicates that cefiderocol and drug-related material did not remain in the body.

Drug-drug interaction of cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, via human drug transporters.

PURPOSE: Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, will be used concomitantly with other medications for treatment of bacterial infections. In vitro studies demonstrated inhibition potential of cefiderocol on organic anion transporter (OAT) 1, OAT3, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, OCT2, multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 2-K, and organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3. The aim of this study was to assess in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of cefiderocol using probe substrates for these transporters. METHODS: DDI potentials of cefiderocol as inhibitors were assessed in a clinical study consisting of 3 cohorts. Twelve or 13 healthy adult subjects per cohort orally received a single dose of furosemide 20 mg (for OAT1/3), metformin 1000 mg (for OCT1/2 and MATE2-K), or rosuvastatin 10 mg (for OATP1B3) with or without co-administration with cefiderocol 2 g every 8 h with 3-h infusion (a total of 3, 6, and 9 doses of cefiderocol with furosemide, metformin, and rosuvastatin, respectively). DDI potentials were assessed based on the pharmacokinetics of the substrates. RESULTS: Ratios (90% confidence intervals) of maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were 1.00 (0.71-1.42) and 0.92 (0.73-1.16) for furosemide, 1.09 (0.92-1.28) and 1.03 (0.93-1.15) for metformin, and 1.28 (1.12-1.46) and 1.21 (1.08-1.35) for rosuvastatin, respectively. Exposures to furosemide or metformin did not change when co-administered with cefiderocol. Slight increase in rosuvastatin exposure was observed with co-administered with cefiderocol, which was not considered to be clinically significant. Each treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Cefiderocol has no clinically significant DDI potential via drug transporters.