Analysis of the DNA-binding properties of TGF-ß-activated Smad complexes unveils a possible molecular basis for cellular context-dependent signaling.

Transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) is a pleiotropic cytokine that modulates a wide variety of cellular responses by regulating target gene expression. It principally transmits signals via receptor-activated transcription factors Smad2 and Smad3, which form trimeric complexes with Smad4 upon activation and regulate gene expression by binding to genomic DNA. Here, we examined the mechanisms by which TGF-ß regulates the transcription of target genes in a cell context-dependent manner by screening a double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide library for DNA sequences bound to endogenous activated Smad complexes. Screening was performed by cyclic amplification of selected targets (CASTing) using an anti-Smad2/3 antibody and nuclear extracts isolated from three cell lines (A549, HepG2, and HaCaT) stimulated with TGF-ß. The preference of the activated Smad complexes for conventional Smad-binding motifs such as Smad-binding element (SBE) and CAGA motifs was different in HepG2 than in the other two cell lines, which may indicate the distinct composition of the activated Smad complexes. Several transcription factor-binding motifs other than SBE or CAGA, including the Fos/Jun-binding motifs, were detected in the enriched sequences. Reporter assays using sequences containing these transcription factor-binding motifs together with Smad-binding motifs indicated that some of the motifs may be involved in cell type-dependent transcriptional activation by TGF-ß. The results suggest that the CASTing method is useful for elucidating the molecular basis of context-dependent Smad signaling.

Repression of SMAD3 by STAT3 and c-Ski induces conventional dendritic cell differentiation.

A pleiotropic immunoregulatory cytokine, TGF-ß, signals via the receptor-regulated SMADs: SMAD2 and SMAD3, which are constitutively expressed in normal cells. Here, we show that selective repression of SMAD3 induces cDC differentiation from the CD115+ common DC progenitor (CDP). SMAD3 was expressed in haematopoietic cells including the macrophage DC progenitor. However, SMAD3 was specifically down-regulated in CD115+ CDPs, SiglecH- pre-DCs, and cDCs, whereas SMAD2 remained constitutive. SMAD3-deficient mice showed a significant increase in cDCs, SiglecH- pre-DCs, and CD115+ CDPs compared with the littermate control. SMAD3 repressed the mRNA expression of FLT3 and the cDC-related genes: IRF4 and ID2. We found that one of the SMAD transcriptional corepressors, c-SKI, cooperated with phosphorylated STAT3 at Y705 and S727 to repress the transcription of SMAD3 to induce cDC differentiation. These data indicate that STAT3 and c-Ski induce cDC differentiation by repressing SMAD3: the repressor of the cDC-related genes during the developmental stage between the macrophage DC progenitor and CD115+ CDP.

Receptor-activated transcription factors and beyond: multiple modes of Smad2/3-dependent transmission of TGF-ß signaling.

Transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) is a pleiotropic cytokine that is widely distributed throughout the body. Its receptor proteins, TGF-ß type I and type II receptors, are also ubiquitously expressed. Therefore, the regulation of various signaling outputs in a context-dependent manner is a critical issue in this field. Smad proteins were originally identified as signal-activated transcription factors similar to signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins. Smads are activated by serine phosphorylation mediated by intrinsic receptor dual specificity kinases of the TGF-ß family, indicating that Smads are receptor-restricted effector molecules downstream of ligands of the TGF-ß family. Smad proteins have other functions in addition to transcriptional regulation, including post-transcriptional regulation of micro-RNA processing, pre-mRNA splicing, and m6A methylation. Recent technical advances have identified a novel landscape of Smad-dependent signal transduction, including regulation of mitochondrial function without involving regulation of gene expression. Therefore, Smad proteins are receptor-activated transcription factors and also act as intracellular signaling modulators with multiple modes of function. In this review, we discuss the role of Smad proteins as receptor-activated transcription factors and beyond. We also describe the functional differences between Smad2 and Smad3, two receptor-activated Smad proteins downstream of TGF-ß, activin, myostatin, growth and differentiation factor (GDF) 11, and Nodal.

The Snail signaling branch downstream of the TGF-ß/Smad3 pathway mediates Rho activation and subsequent stress fiber formation.

Cancer cells acquire malignant phenotypes through an epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which is induced by environmental factors or extracellular signaling molecules, including transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß). Among epithelial-mesenchymal transition-associated cell responses, cell morphological changes and cell motility are closely associated with remodeling of the actin stress fibers. Here, we examined the TGF-ß signaling pathways leading to these cell responses. Through knockdown experiments in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells, we found that Smad3-mediated induction of Snail, but not that of Slug, is indispensable for morphological changes, stress fiber formation, and enhanced motility in cells stimulated with TGF-ß. Ectopic expression of Snail in SMAD3-knockout cells rescued the defect in morphological changes and stress fiber formation by TGF-ß, indicating that the role of Smad3 in these responses is to upregulate Snail expression. Mechanistically, Snail is required for TGF-ß-induced upregulation of Wnt5b, which in turn activates RhoA and subsequent stress fiber formation in cooperation with phosphoinositide 3-kinase. However, ectopic expression of Snail in SMAD3-knockout cells failed to rescue the defect in cell motility enhancement by TGF-ß, indicating that activation of the Smad3/Snail/Wnt5b axis is indispensable but not sufficient for enhancing cell motility; a Smad3-dependent but Snail-independent pathway to activate Rac1 is additionally required. Therefore, the Smad3-dependent pathway leading to enhanced cell motility has two branches: a Snail-dependent branch to activate RhoA and a Snail-independent branch to activate Rac1. Coordinated activation of these branches, together with activation of non-Smad signaling pathways, mediates enhanced cell motility induced by TGF-ß.