Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
PLOS Glob Public Health ; 4(9): e0003014, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226276

RESUMEN

Diabetes is a major global health issue. We evaluated compliance to laboratory-based management guidelines for diabetes (type 1 and 2), essential for effective treatment and reducing diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. Our study utilized South Africa's National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS) data, focusing on patients from birth to age 80 years who underwent initial diabetes laboratory testing between January 1, 2012-January 1, 2016. Patients were categorized into type 1 (<30 years) or type 2 (≥30-80 years) diabetes based on age at first diabetes test. National diabetes guidelines recommend blood glucose to be checked every three-six months post laboratory-diagnosis. We employed a sharp regression discontinuity design to estimate the effect of a laboratory-diagnosis of diabetes on the likelihood of having a follow-up laboratory test 24 months post-diagnosis. Among patients with type 2 diabetes, the probability of a diabetes follow-up laboratory test within 24 months was 52.4% for patients presenting above the diabetes diagnosis threshold vs 31.1% for those presenting below. Although the likelihood of repeat testing rose with higher HbA1c and glucose levels, at the diagnostic threshold there was no clinically meaningful difference (risk difference: -2.2%, 95% CI: -3.3%, -1.2%). These results were consistent among patients with type 1 diabetes, those living with and without HIV, and healthcare setting. In a national laboratory cohort, diabetes laboratory-diagnosis did not lead to increased monitoring as recommended in national guidelines. Strategies to improve patient education, healthcare provider communication, and healthcare system support are essential to enhance guideline compliance and overall diabetes management.

2.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 26(3): 224-231, 2022 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: TB diagnosis in patients with HIV is challenging due to the lower sensitivities across tests. Molecular tests are preferred and the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay has limitations in lower-income settings. We evaluated the performance of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and the lipoarabinomannan (LAM) test in HIV-positive, ART-naïve clinic patients.METHODS: A total of 783 eligible patients were enrolled; three spot sputum samples of 646 patients were tested using TB-LAMP, Xpert, smear microscopy and culture, while 649 patients had TB-LAM testing. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were estimated with 95% confidence intervals.RESULTS: Sensitivities for smear microscopy, TB-LAMP and Xpert were respectively 50%, 63% and 74% compared to culture, with specificities of respectively 99.2%, 98.5% and 97.5%. An additional eight were positive on TB-LAM alone. Seventy TB patients (9%) were detected using standard-of-care testing, an additional 27 (3%) were detected using study testing. Treatment was initiated in 57/70 (81%) clinic patients, but only in 56% (57/97) of all those with positive TB tests; 4/8 multidrug-resistant samples were detected using Xpert.CONCLUSION: TB diagnostics continue to miss cases in this high-burden setting. TB-LAMP was more sensitive than smear microscopy, and if followed by culture and drug susceptibility testing as required, can diagnose TB in HIV-positive patients. TB-LAM is a useful add-in test and both tests at the point-of-care would maximise yield.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Antirretrovirales , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Esputo , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico
3.
Public Health Action ; 11(3): 120-125, 2021 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34567987

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the medical, socio-economic and geographical profiles of patients with rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) and the implications for the provision of patient-centred care. SETTING: Thirteen districts across three South African provinces. DESIGN: This descriptive study examined laboratory and healthcare facility records of 194 patients diagnosed with RR-TB in the third quarter of 2016. RESULTS: The median age was 35 years; 120/194 (62%) of patients were male. Previous TB treatment was documented in 122/194 (63%) patients and 56/194 (29%) had a record of fluoroquinolone and/or second-line injectable resistance. Of 134 (69%) HIV-positive patients, viral loads were available for 68/134 (51%) (36/68 [53%] had viral loads of >1000 copies/ml) and CD4 counts were available for 92/134 (69%) (20/92 [22%] had CD4 <50 cells/mm3). Patients presented with varying other comorbidities, including hypertension (13/194, 7%) and mental health conditions (11/194, 6%). Of 194 patients, 44 (23%) were reported to be employed. Other socio-economic challenges included substance abuse (17/194, 9%) and ill family members (17/194, 9%). Respectively 13% and 42% of patients were estimated to travel more than 20 km to reach their diagnosing and treatment-initiating healthcare facility. CONCLUSIONS: RR-TB patients had diverse medical and social challenges highlighting the need for integrated, differentiated and patient-centred healthcare to better address specific needs and underlying vulnerabilities of individual patients.


OBJECTIF: Décrire les profils médicaux, socioéconomiques et géographiques des patients atteints de TB résistante à la rifampicine (RR-TB) et les implications en matière de soins centrés sur le patient. CONTEXTE: Treize districts de trois provinces d'Afrique du Sud. MÉTHODE: Cette étude descriptive a analysé les dossiers médicaux et de laboratoire de 194 patients ayant reçu un diagnostic de RR-TB au troisième trimestre de 2016. RÉSULTATS: L'âge médian était de 35 ans ; 120/194 (62%) patients étaient des hommes. Un traitement antituberculeux antérieur était documenté chez 122/194 (63%) patients, et 56/194 (29%) avaient une résistance à la fluoroquinolone et/ou à un agent injectable de deuxième ligne documentée. Sur 134 (69%) patients infectés par le VIH, les charges virales étaient disponibles pour 68/134 (51%) patients (36/68 [53%] avaient des charges virales >1 000 copies/ml) et les taux de CD4 étaient disponibles pour 92/134 (69%) patients (20/92 [22%] avaient un taux de CD4 <50 cellules/mm3). Les patients présentaient diverses autres comorbidités, dont hypertension (13/194, 7%) et troubles psychiques (11/194, 6%). Sur les 194 patients, 44 (23%) avaient un emploi. Les autres problèmes socioéconomiques comprenaient la toxicomanie (17/194, 9%) et le fait d'avoir un membre de sa famille malade (17/194, 9%). Respectivement 13% et 42% des patients parcouraient plus de 20 km pour se rendre à leur centre de diagnostic et au centre de soins responsable de l'instauration du traitement. CONCLUSIONS: Les patients atteints de RR-TB avaient divers problèmes médicaux et sociaux. Ces résultats soulignent le besoin de soins intégrés, différenciés et centrés sur le patient afin de mieux répondre aux besoins spécifiques et aux vulnérabilités sous-jacentes de chaque patient.

4.
S Afr Med J ; 110(9): 842-845, 2020 07 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880264

RESUMEN

Antibody tests for the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV2, have been developed both as rapid diagnostic assays and for high-throughput formal serology platforms. Although these tests may be a useful adjunct to a diagnostic strategy, they have a number of limitations. Because of the antibody and viral dynamics of the coronavirus, their sensitivity can be variable, especially at early time points after symptom onset. Additional data are required on the performance of the tests in the South African population, especially with regard to development and persistence of antibody responses and whether antibodies are protective against reinfection. These tests may, however, be useful in guiding the public health response, providing data for research (including seroprevalence surveys and vaccine initiatives) and development of therapeutic strategies.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología
5.
S Afr Med J ; 110(9): 872-876, 2020 Aug 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32880271

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections during pregnancy, which can lead to significant maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Challenges when treating UTIs in pregnancy include fetal protection and resistance development of uropathogens. Currently, the Essential Medicines List recommends nitrofurantoin to treat cystitis and ceftriaxone to treat pyelonephritis in pregnant women. OBJECTIVES: To determine common pathogens causing UTI in pregnancy and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of laboratory data for positive urine specimens from obstetric departments of 6 KwaZulu- Natal Province hospitals during 2011 - 2016. Identification and susceptibility testing were performed using the VITEK 2 system. Results were interpreted according to the breakpoints of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA. RESULTS: From 5 971 positive urine specimens, the most common isolate was Escherichia coli (n=3 236; 54.2%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=770; 12.9%). Group B streptococcus (GBS) (n=239; 4.0%) and Enterococcus faecalis (n=251; 4.2%) were the most common Gram-positive pathogens. E. coli displayed significant resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (65.1%), cephalothin (38.3%), cefuroxime (27.3%), ciprofloxacin (16.9%) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (17.1%). Resistance to ceftriaxone and nitrofurantoin remained low ‒ 9.1% and 7.7%, respectively. Among Gram-positive pathogens, GBS displayed 100% penicillin susceptibility and E. faecalis showed 92.9% susceptibility to ampicillin. CONCLUSIONS: E. coli is unsurprisingly the most common cause of UTI in pregnancy in KwaZulu-Natal. Susceptibility to ceftriaxone and nitrofurantoin remains good. Among Gram positives, GBS is prevalent and susceptible to penicillin, while E. faecalis is susceptible to ampicillin. As antimicrobial resistance evolves, routine surveillance is necessary to modify recommended empirical antibiotic use.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Grampositivas/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Candida albicans/aislamiento & purificación , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecalis/aislamiento & purificación , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Grampositivas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Embarazo , Proteus mirabilis/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica , Streptococcus agalactiae/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus agalactiae/aislamiento & purificación , Orina/microbiología
6.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 24(1): 83-91, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32005310

RESUMEN

SETTING: Thirteen districts in Eastern Cape (EC), KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) and Western Cape (WC) Provinces, South Africa.OBJECTIVE: To pilot a methodology for describing and visualising healthcare journeys among drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients using routine laboratory records.DESIGN: Laboratory records were obtained for 195 patients with laboratory-detected rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) during July-September 2016. Health facility visits identified from these data were plotted to visualise patient healthcare journeys. Data were verified by facility visits.RESULTS: In the 9 months after the index RR-TB sample was collected, patients visited a mean of 2.3 health facilities (95% CI 2.1-2.6), with 9% visiting ≥4 facilities. The median distance travelled by patients from rural areas (116 km, interquartile range [IQR] 50-290) was greater than for urban patients (51 km, IQR 9-140). A median of 21% of patient's time was spent under the care of primary healthcare facilities: this was respectively 6%, 37% and 39% in KZN, EC and WC. Journey patterns were generally similar within districts. Some reflected a semi-centralised model of care where patients were referred to regional hospitals; other journeys showed greater involvement of primary care.CONCLUSION: Routine laboratory data can be used to explore DR-TB patient healthcare journeys and show how the use of healthcare services for DR-TB varies in different settings.


Asunto(s)
Laboratorios , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Humanos , Atención al Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/epidemiología
7.
S. Afr. med. j. (Online) ; 0:0(0): 1-4, 2020. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | AIM (África) | ID: biblio-1271064

RESUMEN

Antibody tests for the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV2, have been developed both as rapid diagnostic assays and for high-throughput formal serology platforms. Although these tests may be a useful adjunct to a diagnostic strategy, they have a number of limitations. Because of the antibody and viral dynamics of the coronavirus, their sensitivity can be variable, especially at early time points after symptom onset. Additional data are required on the performance of the tests in the South African population, especially with regard to development and persistence of antibody responses and whether antibodies are protective against reinfection. These tests may, however, be useful in guiding the public health response, providing data for research (including seroprevalence surveys and vaccine initiatives) and development of therapeutic strategies


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Salud Pública , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Pruebas Serológicas , Sudáfrica
8.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 23(6): 720-727, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31315705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND In KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, the incidence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is driven by the transmission of resistant strains. As data suggest that cases may be spatially clustered, we sought to identify 'hotspots' and describe these communities. METHODS We enrolled XDR-TB patients diagnosed from 2011 to 2014 in eThekwini. Global positioning system (GPS) coordinates for participant homes were collected and hotspots were identified based on population-adjusted XDR-TB incidence. The sociodemographic features of hotspots were characterised using census data. For a subset of participants, we mapped non-home XDR-TB congregate locations and compared these with results including only homes. RESULTS Among 132 participants, 75 (57%) were female and 87 (66%) lived in urban or suburban locations. Fifteen of 197 census tracts were identified as XDR-TB hotspots with ≥95% confidence. Four spatial mapping methods identified one large hotspot in northeastern eThekwini. Hotspot communities had higher proportions of low educational attainment (12% vs. 9%) and unemployment (29.3% vs. 20.4%), and lower proportion of homes with flush toilets (36.4% vs. 68.9%). The case density shifted towards downtown Durban when congregate locations (e.g., workplaces) for 43 (33%) participants were mapped. CONCLUSIONS In eThekwini, XDR-TB case homes were clustered into hotspots with more poverty indicators than non-hotspots. Prevention efforts targeting hotspot communities and congregate settings may be effective in reducing community transmission. .


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Adulto , Ciudades , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Tuberculosis Extensivamente Resistente a Drogas/etiología , Femenino , Sistemas de Información Geográfica , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores Socioeconómicos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/etiología
10.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 21(10): 1154-1160, 2017 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28911361

RESUMEN

SETTING: In South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal is the epicentre of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, where approximately 70% of people with tuberculosis (TB) are co-infected with HIV. Undiagnosed TB contributes to high mortality in HIV-infected patients. Delays in diagnosing TB and treatment initiation result in prolonged transmission and increased infectiousness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the LoopampTM MTBC Detection kit (TB-LAMP; based on the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay), smear microscopy and Xpert test with the gold standard of mycobacterial culture. METHODS: Sputum samples were collected from 705 patients with symptoms of pulmonary TB attending a primary health care clinic. RESULTS: The TB-LAMP assay had significantly higher sensitivity than smear microscopy (72.6% vs. 45.4%, P < 0.001), whereas specificity was slightly lower (99% vs. 96.8%, P = 0.05), but significantly higher than Xpert (92.9%, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in sensitivity of smear-positive, culture-positive and smear-negative, culture-positive sputum samples using TB-LAMP vs. Xpert (respectively 95.9%/55.9% vs. 97.6%/66.1%; P =0.65, P = 0.27). The positive predictive value of TB-LAMP was significantly higher than that of Xpert (87.5% vs. 77.0%; P = 0.02), but similar to that of smear microscopy (94.2%; P = 0.18). The negative predictive value was respectively 91.9%, 92.5% (P = 0.73) and 83.1% (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Given its ease of operability, the TB-LAMP assay could be implemented as a point-of-care test in primary health care settings, and contribute to reducing treatment waiting times and TB prevalence.


Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Esputo/microbiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Adulto , Coinfección , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sudáfrica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA