RESUMEN
Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) and male genital schistosomiasis (MGS) are gender-specific manifestations of urogenital schistosomiasis. Morbidity is a consequence of prolonged inflammation in the human genital tract caused by the entrapped eggs of the waterborne parasite, Schistosoma (S.) haematobium. Both diseases affect the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) of millions of people globally, especially in sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). Awareness and knowledge of these diseases is largely absent among affected communities and healthcare workers in endemic countries. Accurate burden of FGS and MGS disease estimates, single and combined, are absent, mostly due to the absence of standardized methods for individual or population-based screening and diagnosis. In addition, there are disparities in country-specific FGS and MGS knowledge, research and implementation approaches, and diagnosis and treatment. There are currently no WHO guidelines to inform practice. The BILGENSA (Genital Bilharzia in Southern Africa) Research Network aimed to create a collaborative multidisciplinary network to advance clinical research of FGS and MGS across Southern African endemic countries. The workshop was held in Lusaka, Zambia over two days in November 2022. Over 150 researchers and stakeholders from different schistosomiasis endemic settings attended. Attendees identified challenges and research priorities around FGS and MGS from their respective countries. Key research themes identified across settings included: 1) To increase the knowledge about the local burden of FGS and MGS; 2) To raise awareness among local communities and healthcare workers; 3) To develop effective and scalable guidelines for disease diagnosis and management; 4) To understand the effect of treatment interventions on disease progression, and 5) To integrate FGS and MGS within other existing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. In its first meeting, the BILGENSA Network set forth a common research agenda across S. haematobium endemic countries for the control of FGS and MGS.
RESUMEN
Up to 56 million young and adult women of African origin suffer from Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS). The transmission of schistosomiasis happens through contact with schistosomiasis infested fresh water in rivers and lakes. The transmission vector is the snail that releases immature worms capable of penetrating the human skin. The worm then matures and mates in the blood vessels and deposits its eggs in tissues, causing urogenital disease. There is currently no gold standard for FGS diagnosis. Reliable diagnostics are challenging due to the lack of appropriate instruments and clinical skills. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends "screen-and-treat" cervical cancer management, by means of visual inspection of characteristic lesions on the cervix and point-of-care treatment as per the findings. FGS may be mistaken for cervical cancer or sexually transmitted diseases. Misdiagnosis may lead to the wrong treatment, increased risk of exposure to other infectious diseases (human immunodeficiency virus and human papilloma virus), infertility and stigmatisation. The necessary clinical knowledge is only available to a few experts in the world. For an appropriate diagnosis, this knowledge needs to be transferred to health professionals who have minimal or non-existing laboratory support. Co-design workshops were held with stakeholders (WHO representative, national health authority, FGS experts and researchers, gynaecologists, nurses, medical doctors, public health experts, technical experts, and members of the public) to make prototypes for the WHO Pocket Atlas for FGS, a mobile diagnostic support tool and an e-learning tool for health professionals. The dissemination targeted health facilities, including remote areas across the 51 anglophone, francophone and lusophone African countries. Outcomes were endorsed by the WHO and comprise a practical diagnostic guide for FGS in low-resource environments.
RESUMEN
A fístula obstétrica continua a ser um problema de saúde comum em países de baixa e média renda, apesar das tendências de aumento dos partos institucionais nesses países. As circunstâncias socio-comportamentais em que a fístula ocorre, assim como suas consequências, são pouco documentadas, principalmente do ponto de vista das próprias mulheres com fístula obstétrica. Este estudo descreveu as experiências das mulheres em relação aos cuidados pré-natais, de parto e pós-parto no sul de Moçambique e identificou as experiências particulares das mulheres com fístula, a fim de compreender as circunstâncias em que a procura e oferta de cuidados poderiam ter sido modificadas para evitar ou mitigar a contracção ou as consequências da fístula...
Obstetric fistula remains a common health problem in low- and middle-income countries, despite increasing trends in institutional births in these countries. The socio-behavioral circumstances in which the fistula occurs, as well as its consequences, are poorly documented, especially from the point of view of women with obstetric fistula themselves. This study described women's experiences in relation to antenatal, delivery and postpartum care in southern Mozambique and identified the particular experiences of women with fistula, in order to understand the circumstances in which the demand and supply of care could have been modified to prevent or mitigate the contraction or consequences of the fist
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Parto Obstétrico/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Instituciones de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Prenatal/psicología , Embarazo , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirugía , Fístula Vesicovaginal/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Mozambique/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Gigantomastia is a rare disease defined by an extreme and rapid enlargement of the breast, generally bilateral. The majority of cases are reported in pregnant women. Ninety-eight cases of gestational gigantomastia have been identified in electronic databases, and those with fatal outcomes comprised only 2 cases (2%). Despite its benign nature, it can lead to severe complications and even death. Its etiology has not been fully elucidated, but it has been speculated that a hormonal component may play a role in the pathogenesis. Currently, treatment options are limited, and surgery is gaining importance, but it is often not feasible in low-resource settings. Herein, we describe a case of a 30-year-old HIV-positive female with no relevant past medical history, who died due to the complications of gestational gigantomastia at the Maputo Central Hospital, in Mozambique.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Mama/anomalías , Enfermedades de la Mama/patología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Autopsia , VIH , Resultado Fatal , Enfermedades RarasRESUMEN
Embora o diagnóstico de autópsia inclua rotineiramente uma avaliação completa de todos os resultados patológicos disponíveis e também de qualquer dado clínico disponível, a contribuição dessas informações clínicas para o rendimento diagnóstico da autópsia não foi analisada. Nosso objetivo foi determinar em que medida o uso de dados clínicos melhora a acurácia diagnóstica da autópsia diagnóstica completa (ACD) e da autópsia minimamente invasiva (MIA), um procedimento patológico simplificado post-mortem projetado para locais de baixa renda. Um total de 264 procedimentos acoplados MIA e CDA (112 adultos, 57 mortes maternas, 54 crianças e 41 neonatos) foram realizados no Hospital de Maputo, Moçambique. Comparamos os diagnósticos obtidos pelo MIA cego para dados clínicos (MIAb), o MIA adicionando a informação clínica (MIAc) e o CDA cego para informação clínica (CDAb), com os resultados do padrão-ouro, o CDA com dados clínicos, comparando a Classificação Internacional de Doenças, códigos da Décima Revisão e as principais classes diagnósticas obtidas com cada estratégia de avaliação (MIAb, MIAc, CDAb, CDAc). Os dados clínicos aumentaram a coincidência diagnóstica com o MIAb com o padrão-ouro em 30 (11%) de 264 casos e modificaram o diagnóstico CDAb em 20 (8%) de 264 casos. O aumento da concordância entre MIAb e MIAc com o padrão-ouro foi significativo nos óbitos neonatais (κ aumentando de 0,404 para 0,618, P = .0271), adultos (κ aumentando de 0,732 para 0,813, P = .0221) e maternos (κ aumentando de 0,485 para 0,836, 0.; P < .0001). Em conclusão, o uso de informações clínicas aumenta a precisão do MIA e do CDA e pode fortalecer o desempenho do MIA em ambientes com recursos limitados.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Autopsia/métodos , Muerte , Autopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Autopsia/ética , Muerte Materna , Precisión de la Medición Dimensional , Muerte Perinatal , MozambiqueRESUMEN
Background: Client satisfaction is an essential component of quality of care. Health system factors, processes of care as well as mothers' characteristics influence the extent to which care meets the expectations of mothers and families. In our study, we specifically aimed to address the mothers' experiences of, and satisfaction with, care during childbirth. Methods: A population-based cross-sectional study, using structured interviews with published sequences of questions assessing satisfaction, including 4358 mothers who gave birth during the 12 months before June 2016 to estimate satisfaction with childbirth care. Regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of client satisfaction. Results: Most mothers (92.5%) reported being satisfied with care during childbirth and would recommend that a family member to deliver at the same facility. Specifically, 94.7% were satisfied with the cleanliness of the facility, 92.0% reported being satisfied with the interaction with the healthcare providers, but only 49.8% felt satisfied with the assistance to feed their baby. Mothers who had negative experiences during the process of care, such as being abandoned when needing help, disrespect, humiliation, or physical abuse, reported low levels of satisfaction when compared to those who had not had such experiences (68.5% vs 93.5%). Additionally, they reported higher levels of dissatisfaction (20.1% vs 2.1%). Regression analysis revealed that mothers who gave birth in primary level facilities tended to be more satisfied than those who gave birth in hospitals, and having a companion increased, on average, the overall satisfaction score, with 0.06 in type II health centres (CI 0.030.10) and with 0.05 in type I health centres (CI − 0.02 0.13), compared to −0.01(CI -0.08 0.07) in the hospitals, irrespective of age, education and socio-economic background. Conclusion: Childbirth at the primary level facilities contributes to the level of satisfaction. The provision of childbirth care should consider women's preferences and needs, including having a companion of choice. We highlight the challenge in balancing safety of care versus satisfaction with care and in developing policies on the optimum configuration of childbirth care. Interventions to improve the interaction with providers and the provision of respectful care are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Estudios Transversales , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/psicología , Parto/psicología , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/psicología , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente/ética , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Análisis de Regresión , Abuso Físico , MozambiqueRESUMEN
Background: Deficiencies in the provision of evidence-based obstetric care are common in low-income countries, including Mozambique. Constraints relate to lack of human and financial resources and weak health systems, however limited resources alone do not explain the variance. Understanding the healthcare context ahead of implementing new interventions can inform the choice of strategies to achieve a successful implementation. The Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool was developed to assess modifiable aspects of the healthcare context that theoretically influence the implementation of evidence. Objectives: To investigate the comprehensibility and the internal reliability of COACH and its use to describe the healthcare context as perceived by health providers involved in maternal care in Mozambique. Methods: A response process evaluation was completed with six purposively selected health providers to uncover difficulties in understanding the tool. Internal reliability was tested using Cronbach's α. Subsequently, a cross-sectional survey using COACH, which contains 49 items assessing eight dimensions, was administered to 175 health providers in 38 health facilities within six districts in Mozambique. Results: The content of COACH was clear and most items were understood. All dimensions were near to or exceeded the commonly accepted standard for satisfactory internal reliability (0.70). Analysis of the survey data indicated that items on all dimensions were rated highly, revealing positive perception of context. Significant differences between districts were found for the Work culture, Leadership, and Informal payment dimensions. Responses to many items had low variance and were left-skewed. Conclusions: COACH was comprehensible and demonstrated good reliability, although biases may have influenced participants' responses. The study suggests that COACH has the potential to evaluate the healthcare context to identify shortcomings and enable the tailoring of strategies ahead of implementation. Supplementing the tool with qualitative approaches will provide an in-depth understanding of the healthcare context.
Asunto(s)
Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Percepción , Cultura Organizacional , Familia/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Lugar de Trabajo , Países en Desarrollo , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , MozambiqueRESUMEN
Postmortem studies, including the complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) and the minimally invasive autopsy (MIA), an innovative approach to post-mortem sampling and cause of death investigation, are commonly performed within 24 hours after death because the quality of the tissues deteriorates over time. This short timeframe may hamper the feasibility of the procedure. In this study, we compared the diagnostic performance of the two postmortem procedures when carried out earlier and later than 24 hours after death, as well as the impact of increasing postmortem intervals (PMIs) on the results of the microbiological tests in a series of 282 coupled MIA/CDA procedures performed at the Maputo Central Hospital in Mozambique between 2013 and 2015. 214 procedures were conducted within 24 hours of death (early autopsies), and 68 after 24 hours of death (late autopsies). No significant differences were observed in the number of non-conclusive diagnoses (2/214 [1%] vs. 1/68 [1%] p = 0.5645 for the CDA; 27/214 [13%] vs. 5/68 [7%] p = 0.2332 for the MIA). However, increasing PMIs were associated with a raise in the number of bacteria identified (rate: 1.014 per hour [95%CI: 1.002-1.026]; p = 0.0228). This increase was mainly due to rising numbers of bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family and Pseudomonas genus strains. Thus, performing MIA or CDA more than 24 hours after death can still render reliable diagnostic results, not only for non-infectious conditions but also for many infectious diseases, although, the contribution of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. as etiological agents of infections leading to death may be overestimated.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Adulto , Autopsia/métodos , Bacterias/metabolismo , Cambios Post Mortem , Diagnóstico , MozambiqueRESUMEN
Obstetric fistula is one of the most devastating consequences of unmet needs in obstetric services. Systematic reviews suggest that the pooled incidence of fistulae in community-based studies is 0.09 per 1000 recently pregnant women; however, as facility delivery is increasing, for the most part, in Africa, incidence of fistula should decrease. Few population-based studies on fistulae have been undertaken in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Mozambique. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of obstetric fistulae in recently delivered mothers, and to describe the clinical characteristics and care, as well as the outcome, after surgical repair. We selected women who had delivered up to 12 months before the start of the study (June, 1st 2016). They were part of a cohort of women of reproductive age (12-49 years), recruited from selected clusters in rural areas of Maputo and Gaza provinces, Southern Mozambique, who were participating in an intervention trial (the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia trial or CLIP trial). Case identification was completed by self-reported constant urine leakage and was confirmed by clinical assessment. Women who had confirmed obstetric fistulae were referred for surgical repair. Data were entered into a REDCap database and analysed using R software. Five women with obstetric fistulae were detected among 4358 interviewed, giving an incidence of 1.1 per 1000 recently pregnant women (95% CI 2.16-0.14). All but one had Caesarean section and all of the babies died. Four were stillborn, and one died very soon after birth. All of the patients identified and reached the primary health facility in reasonable time. Delays occurred in the care: in diagnosis of obstructed labour, and in the decision to refer to the secondary or third-level hospital. All but one of the women were referred to surgical repair and the fistulae successfully closed. This population-based study reports a high incidence of obstetric fistulae in an area with high numbers of facility births. Few first and second delays in reaching care, but many third delays in receiving care, were identified. This raises concerns for quality of care.