Revisiting Differences in Fourth-Year Orthopaedic Away Rotation Opportunities and Fees Among Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.

Introduction: Fourth-year away rotations are an important modifiable variable proven to increase students' opportunities to match into orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in away rotation eligibility requirements and cost of rotation between allopathic and osteopathic students during the 2023 application cycle. Eligibility requirements and fees were then compared with the 2021 application cycle. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed during the 2023 application cycle of all nonmilitary, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 194). Each program's website, affiliated school of medicine's website, visiting student application service portal, and Residency Explorer tool were searched for eligibility criteria, associated rotation fees, and other rotation requirements. Two-sample Z tests for proportions were utilized to compare differences in programs with differing requirements for students based on academic degree type. Data were compared statistically with previously reported data from the 2021 application cycle. Results: In 2023, there were more programs that restricted osteopathic medical students from away rotations than programs that restricted allopathic medical students (12/194, 6.2% vs. 0/194, 0.0%; p < 0.001). All 12 programs were formerly ACGME-accredited before the integration into a single accreditation system. There was a decrease in the number of programs restricting osteopathic medical students from away rotations compared with the 2021 application cycle (18/194, 9.3% vs. 12/194, 6.2%; p = 0.254). Fees associated with away rotations ranged from $25 to $4,000 for both allopathic and osteopathic students. The number of programs that charged osteopathic medical students higher rotation fees than programs that charged allopathic students when compared with the 2021 application cycles decreased (1/194, 0.5% vs. 5/194, 2.6%; p = 0.049). Conclusions: While some programs continue to have away rotation eligibility requirements that prohibit osteopathic medical students from rotating, only one residency program currently charges osteopathic medical students a higher fee to rotate than allopathic medical students.

Osteopathic Students Have Decreased Match Rates in Orthopaedic Surgery Compared with Allopathic Students.

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgery continues to be one of the most competitive specialties to match into as a medical student, particularly for osteopathic medical students. Therefore, in this study, we sought to examine the prevalence of osteopathic students (DO) matching into orthopaedic surgery at traditional Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredited programs (former allopathic residency programs) in recent years. Methods: A retrospective review of National Residency Match Program annual reports and Association of American Medical Colleges's Electronic Residency Application Service Statistic reports were performed to determine the number of applications and match rates among osteopathic (DO) and allopathic (MD) medical students into orthopaedic surgery from 2019 to 2023. Data on the degree type of current residents at all ACGME-accredited residency programs were identified. Results: During the analyzed study period of 2019 to 2023, there were 3,473 (74.5%) allopathic students and 571 (59.9%) osteopathic students who successfully matched into orthopaedic surgery. This match rate for allopathic students was 74.5% compared with 59.9% for osteopathic students. Of the 3,506 medical students who hold postgraduate orthopaedic surgery positions at former allopathic programs over the past 5 years, only 58 (1.7%) hold an osteopathic degree. Of the 560 medical students who hold postgraduate orthopaedic surgery positions at former osteopathic programs over the past 5 years, 47 (8.4%) hold an allopathic degree. The match rate of allopathic students at former osteopathic programs is significantly higher than the match rate of osteopathic students at former allopathic programs. Conclusions: Osteopathic students continue to match into orthopaedic surgery at lower rates than their allopathic counterparts. In addition, there remains a consistent and low number of osteopathic students matching into former allopathic programs. Allopathic students also have a higher likelihood of matching into former osteopathic programs when compared with osteopathic students matching into previous allopathic orthopaedic surgery programs.

The Impact of Patient Education on Inpatient Fall Risk: A Review.

¼ Patient falls in the hospital are one of the leading sentinel events identified by the Joint Commission.¼ Hospital falls affect orthopaedic patients of older age at higher rates, and up to 34% of falls lead to injury such as fractures.¼ Patients often misperceive their fall risk, and modalities aimed at educating patients to address the incongruence between perceived and actual fall risk significantly reduce fall rate and injurious fall rate.¼ Adequate communication with patients and their families with the goal of educating them may diminish the physical, psychological, and emotional detriment to orthopaedic patients.

Chilaiditi Syndrome Presenting as Partial Colonic Obstruction.

Chilaiditi sign is a rare incidental radiographic finding where bowel is interposed between the diaphragm and the liver, often seen as air under the right hemidiaphragm. A majority of patients with Chilaiditi sign are asymptomatic and remain so throughout their lifetime. Chilaiditi sign is recategorized as Chilaiditi syndrome if it becomes symptomatic and is a very rare etiology of bowel obstruction. As bowel obstruction confers a huge financial burden to the health care system, studies of even the rarer etiologies are of significant value. Particularly in the case of Chilaiditi syndrome, the free air under the right hemidiaphragm can lead physicians to prematurely conclude pneumoperitoneum, which would require an emergent surgical evaluation. It is through the incorporation of a broad differential and clinical presentation that physicians can decrease the inappropriate allocation of hospital resources and unnecessary surgical procedures; additionally, keeping Chilaiditi syndrome on the differential may prevent unnecessary surgical intervention, cost to the patient, and downstream complications. Bowel obstruction secondary to Chilaiditi syndrome is most commonly treated with conservative management including intravenous fluids, bowel rest, decompression, and laxatives. If the symptoms worsen and progress to full bowel obstruction, surgical intervention has shown great efficacy. We report a case of a 69-year-old male who presented to the emergency department for progressively worsening abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting incidentally found to have colonic interposition with mild colonic dilatation on computed tomography (CT) imaging. The patient was diagnosed with bowel obstruction secondary to Chilaiditi syndrome and treated non-surgically with rapid recovery.