Pain scores after open fetal spina bifida repair and caesarean section - a longitudinal cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: In fetal surgery, successful pain management is crucial for postoperative mobilization, prophylaxis of contractions, and fast recovery. This study analyzed patient's pain experience after open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair in comparison to pain scores after the subsequent Caesarean section (C-section). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected with a questionnaire given to 91 women, who had fSB repair and then C-section at our center between 2019 and 2022. It comprised 12 questions covering different aspects of pain experience and satisfaction with pain therapy and was answered by 67 women after fSB repair and 53 after C-section. Postoperative pain was rated on a Likert scale from 0 (slight/rarely) to 100 (strongest/always). Outcomes after fSB repair were compared to those after C-section. Additionally, subgroup analysis compared outcomes of women with different pain levels (group 1-5) after fSB repair. RESULTS: Compared to women after C-section women after fSB repair reported significantly higher maximum pain scores (MPS) (p = 0.03), higher sleep disturbance due to pain (p = 0.03), and sedation rates (p = 0.001) as side effect from pain therapy. No differences were found regarding feelings of insecurity (p = 0.20) or helplessness (p = 0.40), as well as involvement in (p = 0.3) and satisfaction with pain therapy (p = 0.5). Subgroup analysis revealed that women with higher MPS after fSB repair were significantly more often non-Caucasians (p = 0.003) and more often affected by pain while lying in bed (p = 0.007) and during mobilization (p = 0.005). Additionally they reported higher rates of dizziness (p = 0.02) and lower satisfaction rates with pain therapy (p = 0.03). Postoperative complication rate did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: Although women after fSB repair reported higher MPS compared to after C-section, the current pain management was generally perceived as satisfactory.

Prenatal Spina Bifida Repair: Defendable Trespassing of MOMS Criteria Results in Commendable Personalized Medicine.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesize that after publication of the quintessence of the MOMS trial, eligibility criteria for prenatal spina bifida (SB) repair may be modified if a tenable argumentation underlies this decision. METHODS: Our first 154 fetal surgery patients were analyzed with particular focus on how many, which, and why the original eligibility criteria, set forth by the MOMS Trial Protocol, were disobeyed, and what the eventually detectable, negative and positive impacts of these deviations on outcomes were. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients (2 missing consent) were included (100%). In 69 patients (45.4%), a total of 89 eligibility criteria were disobeyed. In 54 (35.6%) cases, the following maternal criteria were concerned: gestational age at operation of >25+6 weeks in 17 (11.2%), uterine pathologies in 13 (8.6%) women, preoperative BMI ≥35 kg/m2 in 12 (7.9%), previous hysterotomy in 7 (4.6%), previous prematurity in 3 (2%), HIV/hepatitis B in 2 (1.3%), psychosocial issues in 2 (1.3%), and placenta praevia in 1 (0.7%). In 32 (21.1%) cases, fetal criteria were disobeyed 34 times: Fetal anomaly unrelated to SB in 19 (12.5%), no/minimal evidence of hindbrain herniation in 13 (8.6%), and severe kyphosis in 2 (1.3%). We could not identify cases where non-observation of criteria led to clear-cut maternal and/or fetal disadvantages. CONCLUSION: This study shows that MOMS trial eligibility criteria for prenatal SB repair should be modified or even abandoned with adequate medical and ethical argumentation, and with written parental informed consent after non-directive, full disclosure counseling. This clear-cut change of paradigm is a necessity as it leads toward personalized medicine, allowing more fetuses to benefit from fetal surgery than would have benefitted with the former, published, MOMS criteria in place.

Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes after Open in utero Spina Bifida Repair.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal spina bifida (SB) repair is a distinct therapeutic option in selected cases. Since this procedure may not only be associated with short-term obstetrical complications, the aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies after open fetal SB repair. METHODS: 138 patients having had open fetal SB repair at our center received a questionnaire regarding the occurrence, course, and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Additionally, medical records were reviewed. All subsequent pregnancies with complete outcome data that progressed beyond 20 gestational weeks (GW) were included for further analysis. RESULTS: 70% of all women answered the questionnaire. Out of this cohort, 35 subsequent pregnancies were reported in 29% of women. The rate of early pregnancy loss including elective terminations was 14%. All 29 pregnancies processing >20 GW ended in live births without preterm births <34th GW. Mean gestational age at delivery was 37.3 ± 1.4 GW. Uterine rupture occurred in two cases (7%) and uterine thinning/dehiscence was present in six cases (21%). No maternal transfusions were required. CONCLUSION: When counseling women undergoing open fetal SB repair, one should consider possible risks for subsequent pregnancies, especially the one of uterine dehiscence and rupture that is similar compared to numbers reported after classical cesarean deliveries.

Fetal surgery for spina bifida in Zurich: results from 150 cases.

PURPOSE: Over the past 10 years, over 150 fetal spina bifida surgeries were performed at the Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. This study looks at surrogates for success and failure of this approach. METHODS: We focused on key outcome parameters including hydrocephalus shunt rate at one year, bladder control at 4, independent ambulation at 3 years, and maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications. RESULTS: From the first 150 patients undergoing fetal surgery for spina bifida, 148 (98.7%) were included in the study. Maternal-fetal surgery was uneventful in 143/148 (97%) cases. Intraoperative problems included resuscitation in 4/148 fetuses (2.7%). 1/148 fetuses (0.7%) died on postoperative day 4. Maternal complications included chorioamniotic membrane separation in 22/148 (15%), lung embolism in 3/148 (2.1%), chorioamnionitis in 2/148 (1.4%), AV-block III and uterine rupture in 1/148 each (0.7%). 1/148 (0.7%) newborn death was recorded. Hindbrain herniation was identified preoperatively in 132/148 (90%) fetuses and resolved completely in 119/132 (90%). At one year, 39/106 (37%) children had required a CSF diversion. At 4 years, 4/34 patients (12%) had normal bladder control. At 3 years, 48/57 (84%) walked independently. CONCLUSION: A majority of patients benefitted from prenatal intervention, in that the shunt rate was lower and the rates of continent and walking patients were higher than reported with postnatal care.

Benchmarking against the MOMS Trial: Zurich Results of Open Fetal Surgery for Spina Bifida.

INTRODUCTION: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study, a.k.a. the MOMS trial, was published in 2011 in the New England Journal of Medicine. This prospective randomized controlled trial proved to be a milestone publication that provided definitive evidence that fetal surgery is a novel standard of care for select fetuses with spina bifida aperta (SB). The goal of our study is to assess whether our center can match these benchmark results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study was conducted according to the MOMS protocol using the same inclusion and exclusion criteria and looked at the same outcome parameters that were used in the MOMS trial. Zurich and MOMS results were compared. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 patients between December 2010 and May 2015 all of whom underwent fetal surgery for SB. Among 51 different outcome variables, there were only 3 favorable (multiplicity-adjusted) significant differences (gestational age at birth, hindbrain herniation, and psychomotor development). There were no statistically significant differences regarding any other parameters. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that rigorous apprenticeship, training, and comprehensive prospective data collection enable centers like the Zurich Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy to achieve benchmark results for open fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and myeloschisis. These results justify the existence and continuation of our program. Outcome documentation is an essential element of quality management. It is medically and ethically fundamental for fetal medicine and surgery centers offering high-end innovative medical care.

Non intentional burns in children: Analyzing prevention and acute treatment in a highly developed country.

The objective of this study was to evaluate where and when pediatric burn injuries occurred. Furthermore the quality of first aid treatment, ratio of skin grafting and length of hospital stay were evaluated. The patient records of 749 children with acute burns admitted to the University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland, were retrospectively reviewed over an 11-year period. Burn injuries in children with an immigrant background were overrepresented in our study population, whereby the proportion of immigrants decreased with rising age. Sixty-five percent of all patients received some form of first aid. Of those 4.5% did not comply with the current guidelines. Furthermore initial assessment of total body surface area (TBSA) by the first line physician was overestimated in 76% of cases. Flame injuries occurred mainly in summertime in outdoor settings and needed significant more often skin grafts than scalds, which mainly occurred indoors and in wintertime. As a result, patients with flame injuries had to stay significantly longer in hospital (flames: 21 days (range: 1-259 days; median: 30; interquartile range (IQR): 30) versus scalds: 7 days (range: 1-130 days; median: 7; IQR: 12); p < 0.001). Furthermore high voltage injuries often resulted in lower-leg amputations (n = 3; 43%). Based on these facts, targets for the improvement of a prevention campaign and the treatment for burned children were named.

Trauma mechanisms and injury patterns in pediatric burn patients.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency, severity, exact patterns and mechanisms of burn injuries in children. The patient records of children with acute burns admitted to the University Children's Hospital of Zurich were retrospectively reviewed over an 11year period. The age group with the highest risk, were children under the age of five (69%). Boys were overrepresented in all age groups, but the gender imbalance increased with age. Infants and toddlers were mainly injured by scalds and contact burns. Conversely, almost three quarters of injuries over the age of 9 were caused by flame. The majority of scald injuries was a result of pulling down hot liquids. The typical distribution of this accident scenario involved mainly the face, trunk and arms. More than half of all flame injuries occurred due to fire accelerants. 55% of children were passively involved while other children throwing flammable substances into a fire. Most of these injuries involved the face and arms. This study shows that burn etiology is age dependent. Additionally, our results demonstrate the diversity of burn accidents and their resulting injuries. These findings may help better specify target groups and subjects for prevention.