RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Oral treprostinil and selexipag are drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway and are approved for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In the setting of unsatisfactory clinical response or tolerability issues while on selexipag, there is little data on clinical benefit, safety, or strategies on transitioning to oral treprostinil. Using prospective data from the ADAPT registry, we aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, safety, and transition strategies in ten patients with PAH transitioning from selexipag to oral treprostinil. METHODS: ADAPT was a prospective, real-world, multicenter, United States-based registry of patients with PAH newly started on oral treprostinil, with a cohort of patients (n = 10) transitioning from selexipag to oral treprostinil. PAH variables of interest were collected from standard-of-care clinic visits. Clinical improvement was defined by modified REPLACE criterion, and risk was assessed by REVEAL Lite 2 from baseline to last follow-up. Real world transition strategies were recorded. Healthcare utilization or worsening PAH was evaluated within 30 days of transitions. RESULTS: Seven patients transitioned due to worsening PAH or lack of efficacy on selexipag, and three patients transitioned due to tolerability issues. Based on the modified REPLACE criterion, five patients demonstrated clinical improvement after transition from selexipag to oral treprostinil. Using REVEAL Lite 2 to assess risk, three patients improved and five patients maintained risk category from baseline to last follow-up. All transitions occurred in an outpatient setting either as abrupt stop/start or cross-titration, without parenteral treprostinil bridging. CONCLUSION: Transition from selexipag to oral treprostinil was safe, performed without parenteral prostacyclin bridging, and resulted in clinical and categorical risk improvements in some patients.
