Intravaginal Isoniazid (INH) and Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Induced Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: This study aimed to compare sublingual misoprostol alone or combined with vaginal Isoniazid (INH) for first-trimester abortion. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 pregnant women with missed abortion candidates for first-trimester abortion were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received 800 µg sublingual misoprostol every three hours maximum for three doses and the second group received 1500 mg vaginal INH followed by the same dose of misoprostol. Vaginal sonography was performed after 24 hours on both groups to observe any retained product of conception. In case of no response or incomplete abortion, the second course of misoprostol (with the same dose) was administered. The abortion (complete or incomplete) rate was reported within 48 hours after the first dose of misoprostol. Results: The rate of successful intervention (either complete or incomplete) abortion within 48 hours of misoprostol administration was 75% in both groups and was not significantly different (P value = 1). Also, hospitalization duration, abortion time, total misoprostol dosage, and the rate of side effects were similar in the two groups. Five patients in the misoprostol group and three in the misoprostol plus isoniazid group underwent emergent D&C because of heavy bleeding. Conclusion: A combined regimen of sublingual Misoprostol plus vaginal Isoniazid with the prescribed dosage has similar efficacy to sublingual misoprostol alone in first-trimester abortion.

Isonicotinic acid hydrazide (INH) versus extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI) for cervical ripening at term: a randomised controlled trial.

The purpose of this trial was to compare extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI) and intravaginal isoniazid (INH) for cervical ripening. This randomised clinical trial included 150 pregnant women who were undergoing induction of labour and who required pre-induction cervical ripening. Patients were randomly assigned to receive EASI or intravaginal INH. Bishop's score at the beginning of the study and before oxytocin infusion was not significantly different between INH and EASI groups. However, the time from first intervention to the beginning of the induction and also to the beginning of the active phase were significantly shorter in EASI group (p value ≤.001). Moreover, INH did not influence the labour process after the beginning of the active phase of labour. In conclusion, INH could be used for cervical ripening especially in the outpatient setting; however, it is a slower ripening agent compared to EASI.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? To date there has been only one study about the safety and effectiveness of isoniazid (INH) in cervical ripening at term pregnancy which has compared INH with misoprostol.What do the results of this study add? The results of this study showed that vaginal INH is an effective agent for cervical ripening at term but in comparison to extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI) it takes a longer time.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? INH can be used in outpatient settings for cervical ripening at term pregnancy which makes it convenient for patient and cost effective for both patient and health system. Further studies are needed to discover the clinical efficacy of INH in comparison to other ripening methods and also the best dosage of INH for cervical ripening.

Can combination of hysterosalpingography and ultrasound replace hysteroscopy in diagnosis of uterine malformations in infertile women?

BACKGROUND: Müllerian anomalies are associated with infertility. Hysteroscopy as the gold standard for evaluating Müllerian anomalies is an invasive, expensive and risky procedure which requires enough experience. Transvaginal sonography (TVS) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) are less invasive procedures, but there is little known about the accuracy of these tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the combination of TVS and HSG with hysteroscopy as the gold standard. METHODS: Medical records of infertile women who were undertaken all three diagnostic modalities were reviewed to analyze their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Ninety-nine infertile women were assessed with a mean±SD age of 29.1±6.47 years, mean±SD duration of themarriage of 8.9±10.28 years, and mean±SD duration of infertility of 5.6± 4.16 years. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TVS were 98.55%, 30%, 76.4%, and 90%, respectively. HSG had a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity of 60%, PPV of 84.62%, and NPV of 85.71%.When both modalities were combined, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 94.2, 66.67, 86.67, and 83.33%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of single TVS, HSG or combined techniques was statistically similar that was equal to 77.7, 84.8 and 85.8 % respectively. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of combination of two diagnostic modalities, 2D TVS and HSG is not higher than HSG alone for assessing uterine malformation in infertile women.

Survival predictors of preterm neonates: Hospital based study in Iran (2010-2011).

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is responsible for 70% of neonatal mortalities. Various factors influence the risk of neonatal mortality in different populations. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate neonatal survival rate of preterm infants, and to define its predictors in Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all preterm (26-37 weeks) infants (n=1612) born alive in Shahid Akbar-abadi university hospital, during one year period (April 2010-2011). These infants were evaluated for fetal-neonatal, maternal, and pregnancy data. Survival analysis was performed and viability threshold and risk factors of neonatal mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Total overall mortality rate was 9.1%. Survival rate were 11.11% for extremely low birth weights (LBW) and 45.12% for very early PTBs. The smallest surviving infant was a 750 gr female with gestational age (GA) of 30 weeks and the youngest infants was a 970 gram female with GA of 25weeks plus 2 days. History of previous dead neonate, need to cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR), need to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, postnatal administration of surfactant, presence of anomalies, Apgar score <7, multiple pregnancy, non-cephalic presentation, early PTB, very early PTB, LBW, very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW), were risk factors for mortality in preterm neonates. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that neonatal survival rate is dramatically influenced by birth weight especially under 1000grams, GA especially below 30 weeks, neonatal anomalies, history of previous dead fetus, multiple pregnancy, non- cephalic presentation, and need for NICU admission, resuscitation and respiratory support with surfactant.