Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Cureus ; 16(7): e65463, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39184670

RESUMEN

A girl who was born at 40 weeks of gestation weighing 3800 g presented with bilious vomiting and abdominal distension shortly after birth. A lower gastrointestinal contrast study showed a microcolon with small bowel atresia. Subsequently, laparotomy, small bowel resection and anastomosis were done. Intra-operative findings noted jejunal atresia type 3a. Post-operatively, the patient developed persistent conjugated hyperbilirubinaemia and hence, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was performed. MRCP revealed possible biliary atresia (BA) of which the patient underwent Kasai hepato-porto-enterostomy. We reported a rare case of double pathology involving jejunal atresia and BA, describing its aetiology, characteristics and treatment availability based on literature.

3.
Malays J Med Sci ; 30(5): 106-115, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37928791

RESUMEN

Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution is widely used as a colonoscopic bowel cleaning agent, although some patients are intolerant due to the need for ingesting large solution volumes and unpleasant taste. A low-volume solution may enhance patient tolerability and compliance in bowel preparation. Accordingly, this study compared the effectiveness of two difference PEG volumes for bowel preparation before colonoscopy in terms of bowel cleanliness, completeness of colonoscopy, patient tolerability and colonoscopy duration. Methods: Using a prospective randomised controlled single-blinded study design, 164 patients scheduled for colonoscopy were allocated to two groups (n = 82 patients in each) to receive either the conventional PEG volume (3 L, control group) or the low volume (2 L, intervention group). The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), a validated scale for assessing bowel cleanliness during colonoscopy, was used to score bowel cleanliness in three colon segments. Secondarily, colonoscopy completeness, tolerability to drinking PEG and the duration of colonoscopy were compared between the groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups in terms of bowel cleanliness (P = 0.119), colonoscopy completion (P = 0.535), tolerability (P = 0.190) or the amount of sedation/analgesia required (midazolam, P = 0.162; pethidine, P = 0.708). Only the duration of colonoscopy differed between the two groups (longer duration in the control group, P = 0.039). Conclusion: Low-volume (2 L) PEG is as effective as the standard 3 L solution in bowel cleaning before colonoscopy; however, the superiority of either solution could not be established.

4.
BMC Womens Health ; 22(1): 316, 2022 07 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35897099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Early detection and intervention are associated with better prognosis and survival. The study aim was to investigate the factors associated with delayed presentation among women with breast symptoms. METHODS: After ethics approval, a cross-sectional study was conducted from January to October 2020 in women with new breast cancer symptoms at their first visit to our clinic. The "Delayed Presentation" questionnaires in the Malay language were used and distributed among the participants. Demographic data and presentation time were recorded. Presentation time was defined as the duration of symptoms prior to visiting any health care facilities. Respondents with presentation times > 90 days comprised the delayed group. The potential factors associated with the delayed presentation were analyzed using cross-tabulation and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 106 respondents to the questionnaire, with a mean age of 34.0 (SD: 11.2) years, and 73.6% (n = 78) were < 39 years old. A total of 35.8% (n = 38) visited the local government clinic first and only 28.3% (n = 30) came to the BestARi clinic directly. The reasons for presentation were a palpable breast lump on breast self-examination (75.5%, n = 80), mastalgia (15.1%, n = 16), nipple discharge (5.7%, n = 6), skin changes (0.9%, n = 1), and others (2.8%, n = 3). Among the respondents, 10.4% (n = 11) had alternative treatments prior to presentation to a hospital. The mean presentation time was 98.9 (SD: 323.7) days. Most of the participants (61.3%, n = 65) presented to us within 1 month. The delayed presentation group accounted for 19.8% (n = 21) of the respondents. The factor that was significantly associated with delayed presentation was the participants' perception of symptoms as not dangerous (adjusted OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.11, 8.38). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of delayed presentations among our patients was lower than the percentage reported in a previous study. Interpretation of a symptom as harmless by the respondent was the only factor significantly associated with delayed presentation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Autoexamen de Mamas , Diagnóstico Tardío , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Malasia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Ann Coloproctol ; 38(6): 409-414, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407370

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA) has several advantages over conventional open appendicectomy (OA). However, about 5% to 10% of LA patients still need to be converted to open surgery. Identifying risk factors that contribute to conversion to OA allows for early identification of patients who may benefit from primary OA. This study aimed to determine the conversion rate of LA to OA and to identify its associated risk factors among patients with acute or perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records was performed among patients with acute or perforated appendicitis who underwent LA between December 2015 and January 2017. With the use of multivariable logistic regression analyses, the predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to OA were investigated. RESULTS: Out of 120 patients, 33 cases were converted to OA which gives a conversion rate of 27.5%. Among 33 patients who were converted to OA, 27 patients (81.8%) had perforated appendix, while in the LA group, perforated appendix cases consisted of 34.5% (P<0.001). Histopathology of the appendix was the predictor of conversion from LA to OA (adjusted odds ratio, 8.82; 95% confidence interval, 3.13-24.91; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The result from our study shows that the overall conversion rate for the study period was high. Patients with perforated appendicitis had a higher risk of conversion to OA. Therefore, preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis may be paramount in predicting conversion to OA.

6.
Malays Fam Physician ; 16(2): 83-85, 2021 Jul 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34386170

RESUMEN

Biliary ascariasis is a rare disease in a non-endemic area. However, it is one of the possible etiological factors for retarded growth as well as malnutrition in children. It may cause intestinal obstruction, appendicitis, biliary obstruction, liver abscess, hepatolithiasis, and pancreatitis in adults. Herein, we report a patient with ascending cholangitis secondary to biliary ascariasis who was successfully managed with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreaticography.

7.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(7)2020 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675132

RESUMEN

WHO declared worldwide outbreak of COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Healthcare authorities have temporarily stopped all elective surgical and endoscopy procedures. Nevertheless, there is a subset of patients who require emergency treatment such as aerosol-generating procedures. Herein, we would like to discuss the management of a patient diagnosed with impending biliary sepsis during COVID-19 outbreak. The highlight of the discussion is mainly concerning the advantages of concurrent use of aerosol protective barrier in addition to personal protective equipment practice, necessary precautions to be taken during endoscopy retrograde cholangiopancreatography and handling of the patient preprocedure and postprocedure.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colangitis/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Adulto , Aerosoles , COVID-19 , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA