The Impact of Growth Hormone Co-Treatment Duration on Outcomes in IVF/ICSI Cycles Among Poor Ovarian Responders.

Background: The efficiency of in vitro fertilization is improved by growth hormone (GH) during ovarian stimulation. Additionally, patients with diabetes experience impaired insulin resistance and compromised glucose tolerance, which further exacerbate their condition. Due to these side effects, in this study, the duration of GH treatment was compared in IVF/ICSI cycles among poor ovarian responders. Methods: In this study, POSEIDON criteria were used to choose patients. Subcutaneous administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist was done beginning on the sixth day of the cycle and continuing through the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection. In one group, GH was administered 4 units/day from the 2nd day of the cycle until hCG injection, and in another group, the first dose was administered on the 6th day of the cycle. Following the administration of hCG, which lasted from 24 to 36 hr, oocytes were retrieved with the support of B-mode sonography. Results: In our analysis, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, and quality of grade A and B embryos. The results show that the treatment or conditions did not have a significant impact on the outcomes among the studied groups. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that a shorter duration of GH administration can yield similar outcomes compared to a longer duration in IVF/ICSI cycles involving poor ovarian responders. This result holds the potential for a more cost-effective and patient-friendly approach in managing assisted reproductive technology procedures. It may lead to reduced side effects and improved adherence to medication regimens in patients.

Assessment of Utility in Migraine: Mapping the Migraine-Specific Questionnaire to the EQ-5D-5L.

INTRODUCTION: There are increasing demands for studies of cost-effectiveness to allocate resources for disease prevention and treatment strategies. The aim of this study is to measure quality of life in migraineurs, based on the Migraine-Specific Questionnaire (MSQ) and EQ-5D-5L, and thereafter map an algorithm to estimate health-state utility values from the MSQ in individuals with migraine. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted between May and July 2018 in a tertiary headache clinic in Tehran, Iran, migraineurs diagnosed based on International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3ß were enrolled and were asked to complete the MSQ questionnaire and EQ-5D questionnaire. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was calculated to measure the correlation between the EQ-5D-5L and MSQ v2.1 domains' score. A P value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. After statistical analysis, several regression models were presented to map the results of the MSQ domains to the utility index, and the preferred model was achieved based on goodness of fit and the model's predictive performance. RESULTS: The preferred MSQ algorithm had approximately the same prediction errors in all migraineurs, episodic and chronic migraine (root mean square error 0.24, 0.24, and 0.23, respectively). The preferred MSQ model explained a variance of 0.26 (R2) in episodic and 0.38 in chronic migraine in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The preferred MSQ mapping algorithm will be suitable in estimating health state utilities in trials of patients with migraine that contain MSQ scores but lack utility values.

Economic burden of medication-overuse headache in Iran: direct and indirect costs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) as a secondary chronic headache imposes a considerable burden on both individuals and societies. Nevertheless, little is known about the burden of MOH in Iran. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to quantify the annual cost of MOH among Iranian patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 84 patients were recruited. Demographic data, headache attack characteristics, related disability, and information about the economic burden of MOH were collected through face-to-face interview. Direct medical and nonmedical costs as well as indirect costs were included in our cost analysis. The prevalence-based approach was applied to estimate the economic burden of MOH. RESULTS: We found that MOH patients in Iran spend averagely $1046 for medical services, $132 for nonmedical services, and $1432 due to lost productivity per year. The per-person annual cost of MOH was US$2610, and the total annual cost for Iran was $10,179,000,000, with direct and indirect cost accounting for 45% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MOH leads to substantial healthcare costs and significant loss of productivity in Iran. Therefore, raising awareness in this area especially for policymakers can use in future health planning and lead to resource allocation in the field of disabling type of headache disorders such as MOH. Our findings also provide a different insight into the burden of MOH, which are likely closer to the actual costs in middle- and low-income countries, and also it could be a sample of such a study in western Asia.

Impact of Melatonin on Motor, Cognitive and Neuroimaging Indices in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

A series of preclinical and clinical studies have shown the immunomodulatory effect of  melatonin, especially in the state of chronic inflammation. A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial was designed to study the tolerability and efficacy of supplemental therapy with melatonin (3 mg/day) in comparison to placebo in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients receiving once weekly interferon beta. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Primary outcomes consisted of the number of relapses, change in Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and the number and volume of new T2 and gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions. Secondary outcomes included change in performance on Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) as well as change in fatigue and depression. The outcomes were evaluated every three months. Twenty-six patients (13 in each group) were recruited in the study. All participants, except for one patient in the placebo group, completed the study. No patient reported serious adverse events. There was no significant difference either in primary or secondary outcomes between melatonin and placebo arm. However, a trend for beneficial effect was observed for melatonin on change in MSFC performance and the cognitive subscore of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (p=0.05 and 0.006, respectively, not corrected for multiple comparisons). We found no significant effect for treatment with melatonin on measures of clinical and functional disability and development of brain lesions in our small sample-size study. Studies with higher statistical power and longer follow up are needed to further evaluate the potential immunomodulatory effect of melatonin in RRMS treatment.