Reward-Mediated, Model-Free Reinforcement-Learning Mechanisms in Pavlovian and Instrumental Tasks Are Related.

Model-free and model-based computations are argued to distinctly update action values that guide decision-making processes. It is not known, however, if these model-free and model-based reinforcement learning mechanisms recruited in operationally based instrumental tasks parallel those engaged by pavlovian-based behavioral procedures. Recently, computational work has suggested that individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward predictive cues, that is, sign- and goal-tracking behaviors, are also governed by variations in model-free and model-based value representations that guide behavior. Moreover, it is not appreciated if these systems that are characterized computationally using model-free and model-based algorithms are conserved across tasks for individual animals. In the current study, we used a within-subject design to assess sign-tracking and goal-tracking behaviors using a pavlovian conditioned approach task and then characterized behavior using an instrumental multistage decision-making (MSDM) task in male rats. We hypothesized that both pavlovian and instrumental learning processes may be driven by common reinforcement-learning mechanisms. Our data confirm that sign-tracking behavior was associated with greater reward-mediated, model-free reinforcement learning and that it was also linked to model-free reinforcement learning in the MSDM task. Computational analyses revealed that pavlovian model-free updating was correlated with model-free reinforcement learning in the MSDM task. These data provide key insights into the computational mechanisms mediating associative learning that could have important implications for normal and abnormal states.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Model-free and model-based computations that guide instrumental decision-making processes may also be recruited in pavlovian-based behavioral procedures. Here, we used a within-subject design to test the hypothesis that both pavlovian and instrumental learning processes were driven by common reinforcement-learning mechanisms. Sign-tracking and goal-tracking behaviors were assessed in rats using a pavlovian conditioned approach task, and then instrumental behavior was characterized using an MSDM task. We report that sign-tracking behavior was associated with greater model-free, but not model-based, learning in the MSDM task. These data suggest that pavlovian and instrumental behaviors may be driven by conserved reinforcement-learning mechanisms.

Reinforcement Learning during Adolescence in Rats.

The most dynamic period of postnatal brain development occurs during adolescence, the period between childhood and adulthood. Neuroimaging studies have observed morphologic and functional changes during adolescence, and it is believed that these changes serve to improve the functions of circuits that underlie decision-making. Direct evidence in support of this hypothesis, however, has been limited because most preclinical decision-making paradigms are not readily translated to humans. Here, we developed a reversal-learning protocol for the rapid assessment of adaptive choice behavior in dynamic environments in rats as young as postnatal day 30. A computational framework was used to elucidate the reinforcement-learning mechanisms that change in adolescence and into adulthood. Using a cross-sectional and longitudinal design, we provide the first evidence that value-based choice behavior in a reversal-learning task improves during adolescence in male and female Long-Evans rats and demonstrate that the increase in reversal performance is due to alterations in value updating for positive outcomes. Furthermore, we report that reversal-learning trajectories in adolescence reliably predicted reversal performance in adulthood. This novel behavioral protocol provides a unique platform for conducting biological and systems-level analyses of the neurodevelopmental mechanisms of decision-making.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The neurodevelopmental adaptations that occur during adolescence are hypothesized to underlie age-related improvements in decision-making, but evidence to support this hypothesis has been limited. Here, we describe a novel behavioral protocol for rapidly assessing adaptive choice behavior in adolescent rats with a reversal-learning paradigm. Using a computational approach, we demonstrate that age-related changes in reversal-learning performance in male and female Long-Evans rats are linked to specific reinforcement-learning mechanisms and are predictive of reversal-learning performance in adulthood. Our behavioral protocol provides a unique platform for elucidating key components of adolescent brain function.