RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of myocardial reperfusion-mainly via angioplasty-has increased in our region to over 95%. We wondered whether old and very old patients have benefited from this development. METHODS: Setting: Greater Paris Area (Ile-de-France). DATA: Regional registry, prospective, including since 2003, data from 39 mobile intensive care units performing prehospital treatment of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (<24 h). PARAMETERS: Demographic, decision to perform reperfusion and outcome (in-hospital mortality). PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Reperfusion decision rate by decade over age 70. SECONDARY ENDPOINT: Outcome. RESULTS: We analysed the prehospital management of 27,294 patients. There were 21,311 (78%) men and 5,919 (22%) women with a median age of 61 (52-73 years). Among these patients, 8,138 (30%) were > 70 years, 3,784 (14%) > 80 years and 672 (2%) > 90 years.The reperfusion decision rate was 94%. It decreased significantly with age: 93, 90 and 76% in patients in their seventh, eighth and ninth decade, respectively. The reperfusion decision rate increased significantly over time. It increased in all age groups, especially the higher ones. Mortality was 6%. It increased significantly with age: 8, 16 and 25% in patients in their seventh, eighth and ninth decade, respectively. It significantly decreased over time in all age groups. The odds ratio of the impact of reperfusion decision on mortality reached 0.42 (0.26-0.68) in patients over 90 years. CONCLUSION: the increase in the reperfusion decision rate was the greatest in the oldest patients. It reduced mortality even in patients over 90 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anciano , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Reperfusión Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Francia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
The e-MUST registry has continuously and comprehensively documented ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs) managed in the prehospital setting by the 39 Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Services (SMUR) of the 8 Emergency Medical Assistance System (SAMU) and subsequently managed in the 36 interventional cardiology services in Île-de-France since 2000. This encompasses a population of over 12 million residents. To date, nearly 44,000 patients have been enrolled. The analysis of these findings reflects the real-world management of these patients and the evolution of their care. The results are shared annually with the investigators' teams and have led to around twenty publications. The latest acquired results have demonstrated, in a series of over 630 patients aged over 90, that nonagenarians particularly benefit from prehospital coronary reperfusion decisions, resulting in a nearly 60% reduction in mortality.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Reperfusión Miocárdica , Francia/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , ElectrocardiografíaRESUMEN
The CARDIO-ARSIF registry has been continuously collecting comprehensive data on coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in the 36 catheterization laboratories across the Île-de-France region since 2000. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, this registry has recorded information from more than 330,000 patients, encompassing more than one million procedures. Among these procedures, 58% consisted of coronary angiography, 13% were percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and the remaining 28% were PCI performed on an ad-hoc basis. This extensive dataset serves as a valuable resource for both qualitative and quantitative assessments of practices and the relevance of procedures in the field of coronary invasive cardiology. The results of these analyses undergo annual validation by a dedicated scientific committee and are shared with the teams of investigators. The exploitation of this data has led to scientific publications, with one notable finding being a consistent reduction in the radiation doses received by patients, regardless of the type of procedure.