Hepatitis B Delta: assessment of the knowledge and practices of hepato-gastroenterologists practicing in non-academic settings in France.

BACKGROUND: Data on the management of Hepatitis B-Delta (HB-D) by hepatogastroenterologists (HGs) practicing in nonacademic hospitals or private practices are unknown in France. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the knowledge and practices of HGs practicing in nonacademic settings regarding HB-D. METHODS: A Google form document was sent to those HGs from May to September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 130 HGs (mean age, 45 years) have participated in this survey. Among HBsAg-positive patients, Delta infection was sought in only 89% of cases. Liver fibrosis was assessed using FibroScan in 77% of the cases and by liver biopsy in 81% of the cases. A treatment was proposed for patients with >F2 liver fibrosis in 49% of the cases regardless of transaminase levels and for all the patients by 39% of HGs. Responding HGs proposed a treatment using pegylated interferon in 50% of cases, bulevirtide in 45% of cases and a combination of pegylated interferon and bulevirtide in 40.5% of cases. Among the criteria to evaluate the treatment efficacy, a decrease or a normalization of transaminases was retained by 89% of responding HGs, a reduction of liver fibrosis score for 70% of them, an undetectable delta RNA and HBsAg for 55% of them and a 2 log 10 decline in delta viremia for 62% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis Delta screening was not systematically performed in HBsAg-positive patients despite the probable awareness and knowledge of the few responders who were able to prescribe treatments of hepatitis delta.

Efficacy and safety of treatment of chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir and ribavirin with or without peginterferon: a French prospective real-life cohort study of unselected 211 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sofosbuvir is the first directly-acting antiviral for the treatment of hepatitis C virus. First, the regimens were combinations with sofosbuvir+ribavirin (SR) or with sofosbuvir+ribavirin and pegylated-interferon α-2a (SPR) with cure rates around 90%. The aim of this study was to report the results of these combinations in 'real-life' in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Main features of patients treated with SR or SPR in 24 hospitals were collected. Undetectable hepatitis C virus week 12 viral load after treatment defined sustained virological response (SVR12). Statistics were performed using StatView software for descriptive analysis and χ for the sub-groups comparisons. RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven patients were analyzed. The average age was 56.1. One hundred and seventy-one (89%) patients had a fibrosis score of at least 3. Seventy-nine patients were infected by a genotype 1 (G1). One hundred and thirteen patients were treated with SR and 95 with SPR. In naive patients: with SPR for 12 weeks, SVR12 was 93% in G1, 100% in G3 and 83% in G4. With SR for 12 weeks, SVR12 was 100% in G2 patients (6/6). The safety of these regimens was satisfactory with only two patients who had to stop P due to severe side effects. Multivariate analysis shows a higher SVR in SPR versus SR (odds ratio = 1.28; P = 0.05) and in G2 or G3 versus others (odds ratio = 1.56; P = 0.04). Moreover, Child-Pugh score B or C (P = 0.02), platelets count under 100G/l (P = 0.05) or a past event of ascites (P = 0.04) was independently associated with less SVR. CONCLUSION: This multicenter large study confirms the good results of SR for 12 weeks in G2 naive patients. Finally, a decompensated cirrhosis, a past event of ascites and a baseline low platelet count were strongly associated with poor response.

Characterization of Samples Identified as Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 without Subtype by Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II Assay Using the New Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO Test.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping continues to be relevant for therapeutic strategies. Some samples are reported as genotype 1 (gt 1) without subtype by the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II (GT II) test. To characterize such samples further, the Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO (Plus) assay, which targets the core region for gt 1a, gt 1b, and gt 6 detection, was evaluated as a reflex test in reference to NS5B or 5'-untranslated region (UTR)/core region sequencing. Of 3,626 routine samples, results of gt 1 without subtype were received for 171 samples (4.7%), accounting for 11.5% of gt 1 specimens. The Plus assay and sequencing were applied to 98 of those samples. NS5B or 5'-UTR/core region sequencing was successful for 91/98 specimens (92.9%). Plus assay and sequencing results were concordant for 87.9% of specimens (80/91 samples). Sequencing confirmed Plus assay results for 82.6%, 85.7%, 100%, and 89.3% of gt 1a, gt 1b, gt 6, and non-gt 1a/1b/6 results, respectively. Notably, 12 gt 6 samples that had been identified previously as gt 1 without subtype were assigned correctly here; for 25/28 samples reported as "not detected" by the Plus assay, sequencing identified the samples as gt 1 with subtypes other than 1a/1b. The genetic variability of HCV continues to present challenges for the current genotyping platforms regardless of the applied methodology. Samples identified by the GT II assay as gt 1 without subtype can be further resolved and reliably characterized by the new Plus assay.

Hepatitis A virus subgenotyping based on RT-qPCR assays.

BACKGROUND: The hepatitis A virus (HAV) is the most frequent cause of viral hepatitis worldwide and is recognized as one of the most widespread foodborne pathogens. HAV genotypes and subtypes differ in their geographic distribution and the incidence of HAV infection varies considerably among countries, and is particularly high in areas with poor sanitation and hygiene. Phylogenetic analyses are traditionally used in clinical microbiology for tracing the geographic origin of HAV strains. In food microbiology, this approach is complicated by the low contamination levels of food samples. To date, real-time reverse-transcription PCR has been one of the most promising detection methods due to its sensitivity, specificity and ability to deliver quantitative data in food samples, but it does not provide HAV subtyping information. RESULTS: Six subtype-specific RT-qPCR assays were developed for human HAV. The limit of detection of HAV was 50 genome copies/assay for subtype IIB, 500 genome copies assay for IA, IB, IIA and IIIB and 5000 genome copies/assay for IIIA. The specificity of the assays was evaluated by testing reference isolates and in vitro HAV RNA transcripts. No significant cross reactivity was observed. Subtyping results concordant with sequencing analysis were obtained from 34/35 clinical samples. Co-infection with a minor strain of a different subtype was suggested in 5 cases and a recombinant event in one case. CONCLUSIONS: These RT-qPCR assays may be particularly useful for accurately tracing HAV in low-level contaminated samples such as food matrices but also to allow co-infection identification in human samples.

Comparison of real-time RT-PCR assays for hepatitis E virus RNA detection.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an increasing cause of acute viral hepatitis in developed countries. Serological testing alone may fail to diagnose acute infection, especially in immunocompromised patients, which justifies the use of molecular assays for diagnosis. Few studies have compared accuracy of HEV RNA detection assays. OBJECTIVES: The performances of five real-time PCR procedures for HEV RNA detection were compared. STUDY DESIGN: First, RNA quantification of hepatitis E diluted standards of 3a and 3b genotypes were performed. Secondly, forty-seven clinical samples of patients with known acute HEV infection were tested using five hepatitis E RNA detection methods of assigned letters A, B, C, D and E. RESULTS: Standards of HEV 3a genotype were detected in 100% of replicates with 2500 UI/ml of sensitivity by using A, B and C assays. Standards of HEV 3b genotype were more accurately detected with a sensitivity of 25 UI/ml in 100% of replicates using C assay and were detected in 100% of replicates with 2500 UI/ml of sensitivity by using A, B and E assays. Overall, B assay detected all of 250 UI/ml dilution and occasionally the 25 UI/ml dilution on both subtypes. The detection rates of clinical samples were 100%, 100% 97%, 97% and 83% for the respective A, B, C, D and E assay. Assays A and B were well correlated, independently of the subtype. However, discrepancies were observed when these techniques were compared to C, D and E assays according to the different subtypes. CONCLUSION: A and B assays appear reliable for HEV RNA detection. These assays target the ORF2/3 overlapping region, described as more conserved than ORF2.

Genotype 4 hepatitis e virus in france: an autochthonous infection with a more severe presentation.

Among hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections diagnosed in 2011 by the French Reference Centre for HEV, 9 were due to genotype 4, which until recently was limited to Asia. Sequences from autochthonous cases formed a single cluster very similar to Belgian swine sequences. Clinical presentation differed from genotype 3 infections.