Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Surg ; 219(1): 129-135, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31262435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy is beneficial in gastric cancer, however this practice is not universal. This study examines trends, identifies associative factors, and examines overall survival (OS) benefit from multimodal therapy in gastric cancer. METHODS: Gastric cancer patients staged IB-III from 2005 to 2014, identified using the National Cancer Database, were categorized by treatment: surgery alone, perioperative chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemoradiation. Groups were analyzed to identify associative factors of perioperative therapy. RESULTS: We examined 9243 patients, with the majority receiving multimodal therapy (57%). The proportion of those receiving perioperative chemotherapy rose dramatically from 7.5% in 2006 to 46% in 2013. Academic center treatment was strongly associated with perioperative over adjuvant therapy (p < 0.0001). An OS advantage was clearly seen in those receiving multimodal therapy versus surgery alone (p < 0.0001), with no difference between perioperative and adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of gastric cancer with multimodal therapy has risen significantly since 2005, largely due to increasing use of perioperative chemotherapy. As perioperative therapy becomes more prevalent, more patients will have the opportunity for the improved survival benefit of multimodal therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Am J Surg ; 217(3): 485-489, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not specifically address optimal antibiotic duration following cholecystostomy. This study compares outcomes for short-course (<7 days) and long-course (≥7 days) antibiotics post-cholecystostomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of cholecystostomy patients (≥18 years) admitted (1/1/2007-12/31/2017) to one healthcare system. RESULTS: Overall, 214 patients were studied. Demographics were similar, except short-course patients had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.0001). There were no intergroup differences in tachycardia (22.5%[short-course] vs 23.3%[long-course]) or leukocytosis (67.1%[short-course] vs 64.4%[long-course]) at drain placement nor time to normalization for pulse, temperature or leukocytosis. There were no differences regarding Clostridium Difficile infection (5.0%[short-course] vs 1.6%[long-course]) or cholecystitis recurrence (8.8%[short-course] vs 10.9%[long-course]). No differences were observed regarding gallbladder-related unplanned readmissions (30-day:18.8%[short-course] vs 17.2%[long-course]; 90-day: 20.0%[short-course] vs 25.8%[long-course]). There were no 30- or 90-day mortality differences (overall mortality: 18.3%). CONCLUSION: Post-cholecystostomy outcomes were comparable between short-course and long-course antibiotics, consistent with emerging literature supporting short-course antibiotics for intra-abdominal infection with source control.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Colecistitis/cirugía , Colecistostomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA