Agreement between local and central anti-synthetase antibodies detection: results from the Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome project biobank.

OBJECTIVES: The CLASS (Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome) project is a large international multicentre study that aims to create the first data-driven anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) classification criteria. Identifying anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-ARS) is crucial for diagnosis, and several commercial immunoassays are now available for this purpose. However, using these assays risks yielding false-positive or false-negative results, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. The established reference standard for detecting anti-ARS is immunoprecipitation (IP), typically employed in research rather than routine autoantibody testing. We gathered samples from participating centers and results from local anti-ARS testing. As an "ad-interim" study within the CLASS project, we aimed to assess how local immunoassays perform in real-world settings compared to our central definition of anti-ARS positivity. METHODS: We collected 787 serum samples from participating centres for the CLASS project and their local anti-ARS test results. These samples underwent initial central testing using RNA-IP. Following this, the specificity of ARS was reconfirmed centrally through ELISA, line-blot assay (LIA), and, in cases of conflicting results, protein-IP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. We also calculated the inter-rater agreement between central and local results using a weighted κ co-efficient. RESULTS: Our analysis demonstrates that local, real-world detection of anti-Jo1 is reliable with high sensitivity and specificity with a very good level of agreement with our central definition of anti-Jo1 antibody positivity. However, the agreement between local immunoassay and central determination of anti-non-Jo1 antibodies varied, especially among results obtained using local LIA, ELISA and "other" methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluates the performance of real-world identification of anti-synthetase antibodies in a large cohort of multi-national patients with ASSD and controls. Our analysis reinforces the reliability of real-world anti-Jo1 detection methods. In contrast, challenges persist for anti-non-Jo1 identification, particularly anti-PL7 and rarer antibodies such as anti-OJ/KS. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting anti-synthetase antibodies, especially when commercial immunoassays test positive for non-anti-Jo1 antibodies.

Outcomes in progressive systemic sclerosis treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with combination therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been shown to improve long-term survival for early diffuse progressive systemic sclerosis (SSc) compared with cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide, however, does not provide a long-term benefit in SSc. The combination of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and rituximab is a potent alternative regimen. We aimed to retrospectively compare the outcomes of SSc patients who underwent AHSCT to patients who met the eligibility criteria for AHSCT but received upfront combination therapy with MMF and rituximab. METHODS: Repeated assessments of modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity (DLCO) values were conducted. Clinical improvement was defined as an mRSS decrease > 25% or an FVC increase > 10%. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined in the absence of persistent major organ failure or death. RESULTS: Twenty-one SSc patients in the combination therapy group were compared with sixteen in the AHSCT group. Age, sex and disease duration were similar between the two groups. Clinical improvement at 12 months was seen in 18 (86%) patients in the combination group compared with 13 (81%) in the AHSCT group (p= 0.7). The hazard ratio for EFS at 24 months favored the combination group (HR = 0.09, P= 0.04). During follow-up, both groups exhibited a significant and comparable reduction in mRSS and an increase in FVC values at each time interval up to 24 months. CONCLUSION: MMF and rituximab compared with AHSCT in SSc patients eligible for AHSCT resulted in similar skin and lung clinical improvement with a better safety profile at 24 months.

A deep look into the storm: Israeli multi-center experience of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases before and after vaccinations.

Objective: We aimed to characterize the course of COVID-19 in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic disease (AIIRD) patients in Israel, taking into consideration several remarkable aspects, including the outcomes of the different outbreaks, the effect of vaccination campaigns, and AIIRD activity post-recovery. Methods: We established a national registry of AIIRD patients diagnosed with COVID-19, including demographic data, AIIRD diagnosis, duration and systemic involvement, comorbidities, date of COVID-19 diagnosis, clinical course, and dates of vaccinations. COVID-19 was diagnosed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction. Results: Israel experienced 4 outbreaks of COVID-19 until 30.11.2021. The first three outbreaks (1.3.2020 - 30.4.2021) comprised 298 AIIRD patients. 64.9% had a mild disease and 24.2% had a severe course; 161 (53.3%) patients were hospitalized, 27 (8.9%) died. The 4th outbreak (delta variant), starting 6 months after the beginning of the vaccination campaign comprised 110 patients. Despite similar demographic and clinical characteristics, a smaller proportion of AIIRD patients had negative outcomes as compared to the first 3 outbreaks, with regards to severity (16 patients,14.5%), hospitalization (29 patients, 26.4%) and death (7 patients, 6.4%). COVID-19 did not seem to influence the AIIRD activity 1-3 months post-recovery. Conclusions: COVID-19 is more severe and has an increased mortality in active AIIRD patients with systemic involvement, older age and comorbidities. Vaccination with 3 doses of the mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 protected from severe COVID-19, hospitalization and death during the 4th outbreak. The pattern of spread of COVID-19 in AIIRD patients was similar to the general population.

The Effect of Different Ethnic Origins in Israel on the Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Systemic Lupus Erythematous.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown a connection between ethnic origin and the incidence and outcome of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the SLE outcomes among Ashkenazi Jews, non-Ashkenazi Jews, and Arabs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed with SLE and followed in lupus clinics at two large tertiary medical centers. The data were obtained from patient medical records. Patients were stratified into three ethnic origins: Ashkenazi Jews, non-Ashkenazi Jews, and Arabs. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) 2K ≤ 4 at last visit. RESULTS: We included 570 patients in this study. The Arab group showed the highest number of SLE classification criteria at diagnosis and last encounters compared to non-Ashkenazi and Ashkenazi Jewish groups (6.0 vs. 5.0 and 4.0, respectively at diagnosis, P < 0.001; 8.0 vs. 7.0 and 6.0 at last visit, P = 0.01). In multivariate models, Arab patients had three times higher risk of all-cause mortality than Ashkenazi Jews (hazard ratio 2.99, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.32-6.76, P = 0.009). ESKD was similar among the study groups. Low disease activity (SLEDAI 2K ≤ 4) at last visit was lower in the Arab group than the Ashkenazi Jews (odds ratio 0.50, 95%CI 0.28-0.87, P = 0.016), depicting a medium-to-high disease activity among the former. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should consider the influence of the ethnicity of the SLE patient when deciding on their care plan.

Urine soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 is a novel biomarker for active lupus nephritis: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of plasma and urine sTREM-1 levels as a biomarker of lupus nephritis (LN) as well as extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with SLE attending a tertiary lupus clinic in 2016-2018 were prospectively divided into 3 groups according to SLEDAI-2K and renal-SLEDAI scores: active renal lupus (ARL), active non-renal lupus (ANL), and inactive lupus (IL). Blood and spot urine samples from each group and matched healthy subjects were analysed by means of ELISA for plasma and urine sTREM-1 levels. RESULTS: The cohort included 59 patients (mean age 41.5+2.9 years, 85% female) with SLE: 15 ARL, 14 ANL, and 30 IL. The ARL group had higher scores on the SLEDAI-2K and renal-SLEDAI, and higher urine protein/creatinine ratio than the other patient groups (p=0.0001 for all). Plasma sTREM-1 level was highest in the ANL group (p=0.0085). Urine sTREM-1 level was higher in the whole SLE cohort than the healthy controls (p=0.0249), and higher in the ARL group than the others (p=0.0044). Neither plasma nor urine sTREM-1 level was associated with non-renal SLE features. On Spearman correlation analysis, urine sTREM-1 level, but not plasma sTREM-1 level, was correlated positively with renal-SLEDAI score (r=0.34, p=0.018), inversely with serum C3 and C4 levels (r=-0.42, p=0.0027 and r=-0.28, p=0.056, respectively), and positively with proteinuria (UPCR: r=0.32, p=0.0305). CONCLUSIONS: Urine sTREM-1 might serve as a potential biomarker of active renal SLE.

Diagnostic utility of clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and serum ferritin in diagnosis of adult-onset Still disease.

The diagnosis of adult-onset Still disease (AOSD) is challenging with ambiguous clinical presentation and no specific serological markers. We aim to evaluate the diagnostic utility of clinical, laboratory and serum ferritin features in established AOSD patients. We included all patients >18 years who were admitted to 2 tertiary medical centers (2003-2019) with serum ferritin above 1000 ng/mL. AOSD patients and non-AOSD controls were matched in 1:4 ratio for age and sex. The primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio and area under the curve (AUC) using clinical and laboratory characteristics based on the Yamaguchi classification criteria, in addition to serum ferritin. We identified 2658 patients with serum ferritin above 1000 ng/m, of whom 36 diagnosed with AOSD and 144 non-AOSD matched controls. Presence of arthralgia/arthritis showed the highest sensitivity (0.74), specificity (0.93), positive likelihood ratio (10.69), negative likelihood ratio (0.27) and AUC (0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92) to the diagnosis of AOSD. On the other hand, serum ferritin showed variation and poorer results, depends on the chosen ferritin cutoff. Joint involvement showed the best diagnostic utility to establish the diagnosis of AOSD. Although clinicians use often elevated ferritin levels as an anchor to AOSD, the final diagnosis should be based on thorough clinical evaluation.

Lower socioeconomic status worsens outcome of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus independently of access to healthcare.

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status (SES) has been found to be associated with worse outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The impact of national health insurance on SLE outcomes has not been explored. METHODS: A retrospective inception cohort of patients older than 18 years with SLE diagnosed and followed in lupus clinics of two large tertiary medical centers were included. Patients were stratified into three groups by SES: lower 25th quantile, middle 25th-75th quantile, and upper 75th quantile. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, development of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and score ≤ 4 on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI 2K) at the last visit. RESULTS: We identified 617 patients (548 females, 88.8%) with a median follow-up of 15 years (range, 8.0-23.0). Compared to the middle and upper SES groups, the lower SES group was characterized by younger age at disease onset (31.5 years vs. 34.3 and 37.4 years, respectively, p = 0.011) and higher rate of lupus nephritis (42.7% vs. 35.7% and 23.8%, respectively, p = 0.002). In multivariate models, patients in the middle and upper SES groups had a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82, p = 0.010) and ESKD (HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.73, p = 0.012), with no effect on the rate of SLEDAI 2K ≤ 4 (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 0.92-2.40, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Even within a health system that provides high and equal accessibility to medical care, low SES is associated with worse outcomes of SLE. Policymakers should focus on managing possible barriers that prevent patients of lower SES from obtaining optimal care.

Hydroxychloroquine in the pregnancies of women with lupus: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple guidelines recommend continuing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for SLE during pregnancy based on observational data. The goal of this individual patient data meta-analysis was to identify the potential benefits and harms of HCQ use within lupus pregnancies. METHODS: Eligible studies included prospectively collected pregnancies in women with lupus. After a systematic literature search, seven datasets meeting inclusion criteria were obtained. Pregnancy outcomes and lupus activity were compared for pregnancies with a visit in the first trimester in women who did or did not take HCQ throughout pregnancy. Birth defects were not systematically collected. This analysis was conducted in each dataset, and results were aggregated to provide a pooled OR. RESULTS: Seven cohorts provided 938 pregnancies in 804 women. After selecting one pregnancy per patient with a first trimester visit, 668 pregnancies were included; 63% took HCQ throughout pregnancy. Compared with pregnancies without HCQ, those with HCQ had lower odds of highly active lupus, but did not have different odds of fetal loss, preterm delivery or pre-eclampsia. Among women with low lupus activity, HCQ reduced the odds of preterm delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This large study of prospectively-collected lupus pregnancies demonstrates a decrease in lupus activity among woman who continue HCQ through pregnancy and no harm to pregnancy outcomes. Like all studies of HCQ in lupus pregnancy, this study is confounded by indication and non-adherence. As this study confirms the safety of HCQ and diminished SLE activity with use, it is consistent with current recommendations to continue HCQ throughout pregnancy.

Anti-Ro/SS-A antibody is associated with worse pulmonary outcome and reduced overall survival in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the association of anti-Ro/SS-A antibody with organ involvement and disease outcome in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: A retrospective, long-term study of a cohort of incident patients diagnosed with SSc and continuously followed at our rheumatology clinic during 1990-2018. RESULTS: Included were 105 patients with known anti-Ro/SS-A antibody status, 92.4% female, mean age at diagnosis 52.0 ± 15.6 years, and median follow-up of 10 years; 64% were diagnosed with limited cutaneous SSc, 18% with diffuse cutaneous SSc, and 18% had SSc siné scleroderma or undetermined disease type. Anti-Ro/SS-A antibody tested positive in 21% of patients. In univariate analysis, anti-Ro/SS-A antibody positivity was significantly associated with SSc overlap with Sjögren's syndrome (p < .001). Predicted forced vital capacity deterioration at last encounter was significantly associated with anti-Ro/SS-A antibody positivity. In multivariate regression for anti-Ro/SS-A antibody-positive SSc patients and disease outcome [adjusted for age > 50 years, smoking, and baseline predicted forced vital capacity (pFVC) < 80%], positive anti-Ro/SS-A antibody was significantly associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate (HR 5.17, CI 95%, 1.18-22.67, p = .029), and greater deterioration of pFVC defined as a decrement of last available pFVC compared to first available pFVC of ≥10% (HR 3.65, CI 95%, 1.07-12.38, p = .038). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Ro/SS-A antibody is an independent risk factor for worse pulmonary outcome and higher all-cause mortality in patients with SSc.

Diffused coronary involvement in Takayasu arteritis with concomitant malignancy.

Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) is composed of conditions in which inflammation of blood vessel walls affects mainly large arteries, such as the aorta and its main branches, and in some cases the coronary arteries. Coronary artery involvement in systemic vasculitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We present a case of a young patient diagnosed with extensive coronary disease diagnosed as Takayasu arteritis, when whom a concomitant diagnosis of Hodgkin's lymphoma was made. The literature review revealed ten cases of malignancies associated with Takayasu arteritis. We discuss the complexity of the management of concurrent hematological malignancy with TAK and extensive coronary arteritis. This complicated and cross-disciplinary case also represents the pivotal importance of multi-disciplinary team decision in order to achieve the best clinical outcome of both disorders.

[NEUROLOGIC COMPLICATIONS AROUND THE DIAGNOSIS OF KIKUCHI-FUJIMOTO DISEASE: A RARE PRESENTATION OF THE DISEASE OR A HINT OF AN ADDITIONAL DIAGNOSIS?]

INTRODUCTION: Neurologic symptoms are an extremely rare presentation of Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease. We report a case of a young female patient diagnosed with Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease, presenting with neurologic symptoms compatible with aseptic meningitis, along with radiographic findings which improved with steroidal treatment. Despite the rarity of these findings, they were reported as part of the disease manifestation, however, since Kikuchi-Fujimoto disease is associated with other diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), other diagnoses cannot be ruled out.

Elevated Plasma Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 Level in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): A Biomarker of Disease Severity and Outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plasma levels of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (sTREM-1) reflect innate immune cell activation. We sought to evaluate sTREM-1 levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and their predictive value for disease severity and outcome. METHODS: Plasma sTREM-1 levels were prospectively measured by ELISA in 121 consecutive patients with new-onset (≤24 h) chest pain at arrival to the emergency department (ED) and 73 healthy controls. Secondary endpoints were the association of plasma levels of sTREM-1 with day 30 and month 6 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as death, ACS, stroke, and need for coronary revascularization, as well as with CAD severity. The primary endpoint of the study was the association of plasma sTREM-1 level at the time of admission to the ED with a diagnosis of ACS at day 30. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (48.7%) were diagnosed with ACS and 62 (51.3%) with nonspecific chest pain (NSCP). Median plasma sTREM-1 level at admission was significantly higher in the ACS group than the NSCP group and the control group (539.4 ± 330.3 pg/ml vs. 432.5 ± 196.4 pg/ml vs. 230.1 ± 85.5 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.001) and positively correlated with the number of stenosed/occluded coronary arteries on angiography (P < 0.001). On logistic regression analysis, higher sTREM-1 levels predicted definite ACS vs. NSCP determined on day 30 (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, P = 0.01) as well as with recurrent ACS (P = 0.04) and stroke (P = 0.02) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma sTREM-1 levels are significantly elevated in patients with ACS and might serve as a biomarker differentiating ACS from NSCP in the ED as well as an inflammatory biomarker for coronary artery disease severity and outcome.

Hematological Manifestations among Patients with Rheumatic Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic diseases have many hematological manifestations. Blood dyscrasias and other hematological abnormalities are sometimes the first sign of rheumatic disease. In addition, novel antirheumatic biological agents may cause cytopenias. SUMMARY: The aim of this review was to discuss cytopenias caused by systemic lupus erythematosus and antirheumatic drugs, Felty's syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia, thrombosis, and thrombotic microangiopathies related to rheumatological conditions such as catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome and scleroderma renal crisis. Key Message: The differential diagnosis of various hematological disorders should include rheumatic autoimmune diseases among other causes of blood cell and hemostasis abnormalities. It is crucial that hematologists be aware of these presentations so that they are diagnosed and treated in a timely manner.

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Injections of Tocilizumab in Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab is an interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist used treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes are approved for the treatment of adults with RA. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate SC tocilizumab in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS: Our study was a multi-center, open-label, single-arm study. Participants were adults with a diagnosis of active RA, previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), with or without biologic agents. Participants received a weekly SC injection of tocilizumab 162 mg as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or DMARDs for 24 weeks. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed. RESULTS: Treatment of 100 patients over 24 weeks resulted in improvement in all efficacy parameters assessed: Clinical Disease Activity Index, Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, American College of Rheumatology response scores, Simplified Disease Activity Index, tender and swollen joint counts, and patient-reported outcomes including fatigue, global assessment of disease activity, pain, and Health Assessment Quality of Life Disease Index. Improvement was achieved as early as the second week of treatment. There were 473 adverse events (AEs)/100 patient-years (PY) and 16.66 serious AEs/100 PY. The most common AEs were neutropenia (12%), leukopenia (11%), and increased hepatic enzymes (11%). Of a total of 42 PY, the rates of serious infections and AEs leading to discontinuation were 4.8, and 11.9 events/100 PY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The safety, tolerability, and efficacy profile of tocilizumab SC were comparable to those reported in other studies evaluating the IV and SC routes of administration.

The impact of tocilizumab on anxiety and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Mood disorders, such as anxiety and depression, are extremely prevalent among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we assessed the impact of treatment with tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 antagonist, upon anxiety and depressive symptoms in a cohort of RA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants were adults diagnosed with RA who received a weekly subcutaneous injection of tocilizumab for 24 weeks. We used the Hamilton Depression (HDRS) and Anxiety (HAMA) scores in order to assess the severity of depression and anxiety, respectively. RA disease activity indices and depression and anxiety levels were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks and study completion. RESULTS: Ultimately, 91 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 54 years, and the majority were female (79%). The mean score in all disease activity indices as well as depression and anxiety levels decreased dramatically from baseline to study completion. Sixty patients (66%) demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety and/or depression levels. When logistic regression was performed, an HDRS score indicative of depression at study baseline demonstrated an independent association with a significant psychiatric response whilst older age and increased baseline weight were negatively associated. HAMA and HDRA scores correlated with the following RA disease activity parameters, respectively; HAQ-DI (r = .4, .42), DAS28 (r = .29, .32) and CDAI (0.28 and 0.33), all of them were statistically significant (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a favourable impact of TCZ therapy on parameters reflecting depression and anxiety severity in patients with RA.

A Cross-sectional Survey on the Preference of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis for Route of Administration of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs: Oral Target-Specific Versus Parenteral Biologic.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend initiation of parenteral biologic or oral target-specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who do not adequately respond to conventional DMARDs. OBJECTIVES: To compare the preferred route of administration of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs in RA patients who were previously treated with at least one type. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted of consecutive RA patients previously prescribed bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. We analyzed the factors associated with patients' preferred route of administration. RESULTS: The cohort included 95 patients, mostly female (72.6%), seropositive (81.05%), mean age 63.4 ± 11.9 years. The oral route was preferred by 39 patients (41%) and 56 (59%) preferred the parenteral route. Most patients (65.9%) preferred to continue with their current route (P < 0.001). Switching from a current route was less common with patients who were currently using the oral route (13.3% vs. 38.2%, P = 0.04). Many patients (53.8%) who preferred the oral route had never experienced it before, while this was rare (3.6%) regarding the parenteral route (P = 0.0001). Employment status was associated with preference of the subcutaneous route over the intravenous route of bDMARDs (P = 0.01). Of the 21 patients who had previously experienced both parenteral and oral treatment, 16 (76.2%) preferred the oral route. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients preferred to continue treatment with an administration route they have already experienced. However, when choosing an unexperienced route, significantly more patients preferred the oral route. Our results strengthen the understanding of patient preferences, which could improve drug adherence, compliance, and disease outcome.

The safety of pulse corticosteroid therapy- Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To amass all available evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the safety of pulse corticosteroids therapy, in order to establish its safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All electronic databases from 1/1966 up to 02/2019 were reviewed to find all randomized controlled trials comparing pulse corticosteroids to oral corticosteroids or to placebo/no treatment. Two reviewers independently extracted and recorded data regarding type of corticosteroid treatment, dosages, length of treatment and follow-up. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% (CI) for differences between pulse corticosteroids and comparator were pooled using a fixed effect meta-analysis. The primary outcome was occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs). Secondary outcomes included any adverse events (AEs), AEs requiring discontinuation, AEs per system involved and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 64 trials were included: 18 trials which compared pulse corticosteroids to oral corticosteroids and 46 trials which compared pulse corticosteroids to placebo/no intervention. Pulse corticosteroids was not associated with increased risk for SAEs for both comparators: RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.52-1.14), and RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1.06), respectively. Sensitivity analysis based on adequate allocation concealment and use of a valid AE grading did not alter the results. Subgroup analysis revealed no increased risk of specific SAEs or AEs with pulse corticosteroids compared to oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: Pulse corticosteroids was not associated with an increase risk of SAEs and should be regarded as safe.

Incident gout and chronic Kidney Disease: healthcare utilization and survival.

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled gout can cause significant joint and organ damage and has been associated with impairments in quality of life and high economic cost. Gout has also been associated with other comorbid diseases, such as chronic kidney disease. The current study explored if healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and survival differs between patients with incident gout in the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Clalit Health Services (CHS) data were used to conduct a retrospective population-based cohort study of incident gout between 1/1/2006-31/12/2009. Incident cases of gout were identified and stratified by CKD status and by age group (< 55 and 55+ years). CKD status was defined as a pre-existing diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, chronic renal failure, kidney transplantation, or dialysis at index date. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as healthcare resource use, were reported. RESULTS: A total of 12,940 incident adult gout patients, with (n = 8286) and without (n = 4654) CKD, were followed for 55,206 person-years. Higher rates of HRU were observed for gout patients with CKD than without. Total annual hospital admissions for patients with gout and CKD were at least 3 times higher for adults < 55 (mean = 0.51 vs 0.13) and approximately 1.5 times higher for adults 55+ (mean = 0.46 vs 0.29) without CKD. Healthcare utilization rates from year 1 to year 5 remained similar for gout patients < 55 years irrespective of CKD status, however varied according to healthcare utilization by CKD status for gout patients 55+ years. The 5-year all-cause mortality was higher among those with CKD compared to those without CKD for both age groups (HR< 55 years = 1.65; 95% CI 1.01-2.71; HR55+ years = 1.50; 95% CI 1.37-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests important differences exist in patient characteristics and outcomes among patients with gout and CKD. Healthcare utilization differed between sub-populations, age and comorbidities, over the study period and the 5-year mortality risk was higher for gout patients with CKD, regardless of age. Future work should explore factors associated with these outcomes and barriers to gout control in order to enhance patient management among this high-risk subgroup.

Elevated plasma level of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 is associated with inflammation activity and is a potential biomarker of thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) is an innate-immune receptor found in blood. Its presence reflects innate immune cell activation. We sought to investigate plasma sTREM-1 levels in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (PAPS). METHODS: A cross-sectional, case-control design was used. Plasma sTREM-1 levels were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in consecutive patients diagnosed with PAPS or asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) carriers and controls. RESULTS: The study cohort included 33 patients with PAPS, 10 asymptomatic APLA carriers, and 73 controls. Mean plasma sTREM-1 levels were significantly higher in patients with PAPS (299.2 ± 146.7 pg/ml) and thrombotic PAPS-ever (current and past thrombotic event) (327.2 ± 151.3 pg/ml) compared with controls (230.2 ± 85.5 pg/ml; p = 0.006 and p = 0.003, respectively), patients with thrombotic PAPS compared with patients with past obstetric APS (195.12 ± 58.52 pg/ml, p = 0.01) and APLA carriers (215.8 ± 51.6 pg/ml, p = 0.02), patients with current thrombotic PAPS (429.5 ± 227.5 pg/ml) compared with patients with past thrombotic PAPS (289.5 ± 94.65 pg/ml, p = 0.01), and patients with PAPS who had ever had a stroke or venous thromboembolic event compared with patients who had not (p = 0.007 and p = 0.02, respectively). On receiver operator characteristic curve analysis, plasma sTREM-1 levels differentiated patients with current thrombotic PAPS from asymptomatic APLA carriers and controls, with an area under the curve of 0.7292 (p = 0.0014) and 0.88 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Multivariate regression analysis to identify sTREM-1 predictors (thrombotic PAPS-ever, age, and sex) yielded an independent association of sTREM-1 levels with thrombotic PAPS (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma sTREM-1 levels are significantly elevated in patients with thrombotic PAPS. Levels of sTREM-1 might serve as a biomarker for thrombosis in patients with PAPS.